Showing posts with label Sommerbier. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sommerbier. Show all posts

Tuesday, 7 April 2020

Lager Beer

It's been getting on for a month since I last wrote any non-travel posts. Very odd getting back into the swing.

One of my favourite themes - Lager in late 19th-century Britain seems a good place to start.

"Lager Beer.
Lager beer, the beer of Bavaria, is prepared by a slow process of fermentation from strong infusions of malt, barley, and hops, and grape-sugar or glucose. The beer is usually fermented in winter, as it requires a temperature of not more than from 40° to 50° Fahr.; and in the hot weather the rooms must be cooled by means of ice or ice machines. This kind of fermentation is what is called sedimentary or under fermentation, in contradistinction to ordinary or surface fermentation—the scum or yeast collecting at the bottom instead of at the surface, so that the air has free access, and the gluten is more completely converted into yeast. This bottom yeast is quite different from ordinary yeast, and has a tendency to induce the kind of fermentation by which it was produced."
Holmes' Brewing Trade Gazette - Thursday 01 September 1881, page 15.

From the first sentence it's clear that it isn't a description of Bavarian brewing. As glucose was definitely not allowed when brewing bottom-fermenting beer.

Which is made clear in the next section. Which makes specific mention of New York city.

"The following is a brief outline of the process employed at one of the largest lager beer breweries in New York city:- The barley is placed in wooden cisterns, covered with water, and allowed to remain for two or three days in soak, the water being changed once in twenty-four hours. It is then allowed to drain, and is subsequently thrown out in heaps on stone floors, where it heats spontaneously and soon begins to germinate, throwing out rootlets and shoots and evolving part of its absorbed water — sweating. It is then spread out and the germination allowed to proceed for from six to ten days, until the rootlets become brownish; then spread and tossed about to cool and check the fermentation. It is then put into large brick ovens on kilns, at a temperature of about 125° Fahr., to dry. The barley is now malt."
Holmes' Brewing Trade Gazette - Thursday 01 September 1881, page 15. 

Not quite sure why they bothered to detail the malting process. The next bit detailing the brewing process itself is more interesting.

"It is first crushed by passing between a series of large rollers, and next is transferred to the mash-tubs, where it is stirred about with water at 120° to 140° Fahr., and boiling is then gradually added until all is heated to about 170° Fahr. The infusion or wort is allowed to stand until the suspended matters have settled, when it is drawn off, and a second wort is obtained by treating the residuum with hot water. The first wort is boiled with the hops, the second wort is then let in, and the whole is boiled for about four hours. It is then run into the cooler, where it is quickly chilled to between and 50° Fahr., by running over small pipes through which cold water is continually flowing. As soon as it is properly cooled it is run into the fermenting tuns, where it is mixed with one gallon of yeast for every twenty to twenty-five barrels. Fermentation continues for about twenty days. At first there is a heavy froth, which soon subsides, however, leaving the surface clear. At the end of this period it is racked off into hogsheads, the yeast remaining at the bottom of the tuns. These hogsheads are allowed to stand with the bungs open until a few days before the beer is put into barrels for use, when the bungs are driven in to accumulate carbonic acid for life."
Holmes' Brewing Trade Gazette - Thursday 01 September 1881, pages 15 - 16.

That doesn't sound like a proper decoction as none of the wort is being boiled. But not really an infusion mash, either. the lagering sounds pretty standard, though a hogshead is quite a small vessel for the purpose.

The types of beer being made sound very central European: winter beer, summer beer and Bock.

"Three varieties of beer are made. 1. "Lager," or summer beer, is prepared from the following:— Water, 1 barrel; malt, 3 bushels; hops, 1.5 to 3 lbs.; yeast, about 1/3 pint. Grapesugar or glucose can be made to substitute part of the malt, and is very commonly used for this purpose; in some cases to fully one-fourth the weight of the malt. Lager beer is usually stored from four to six months. 2. "Schenck," winter, or present use beer: Water, 1 barrel; malt, 2 to 3 bushels; hops, 1 lb.; yeast, about 1/3 pint. It is ready for use in from four to six weeks. 3. "Bock" beer, an extra strong beer, made in small quantities and served to customers in the spring, during the interval between the giving out of the sclienck beer and the tapping of the lager. In its preparation are used : Water, 1 barrel; malt, 3.5 bushels; hops, 1 lb.; yeast, about 2/3 pint. Bock beer requires about two months in its preparation."
Holmes' Brewing Trade Gazette - Thursday 01 September 1881, page 16.

That does tell us something useful about the beers. Though I can't help wondering if the bushel being used is different from an imperial bushel. Because 3 bushels to a barrel would implay an OG of around 1080º, which is obviously way too high for a Lagerbier.

1.5 to 3 lbs for 3 bushels of malt is the equivalent of 4 to 8 lbs per quarter. The top end of that is about the same rate as an English Mild Ale of the period. The bottom end of 4 lbs per quarter of malt is lower than the rate for any UK beer back then.

Finally, a lisst of all the other shit that was put into beer.

"Starch, grape-sugar or glucose, glycerine and molasses are not unfrequently introduced into beers to replace part of the malt, while pine bark, quassia, walnut leaf, wormwood, bitter cloves, aloes, etc., are sometimes used to neutralize acidity or conceal dilution. The colour of the beer depends much upon the care with which the malt is handled, and the temperature with which it is kiln dried. 90° to 100° Fahr. produces pale malt; 120° to 125°, amber malt. At temperatures above this the malt becomes brown, and the wort produced from it has a similar colour. The malt should be dried so that every part of it becomes crisp.—Scientific American."
Holmes' Brewing Trade Gazette - Thursday 01 September 1881, page 16.

Some of those bittering agents are familiar to me from adulterations in the UK. Though wanut leaf is a new one to me.

Saturday, 27 June 2015

Dutch Lager Styles 1870 - 1960 (part two)

Early Lager styles
It’s easy to assume, looking back from the present, that Pilsener was an immediate success. It wasn’t, because, initially at least, it wasn’t the type of Lager brewed.  In the 1860’s, few Pale Lagers were brewed outside Bohemia.

The styles of Lager first brewed outside Germany were inspired by the two pioneers who revolutionised central European brewing: Dreher of Schwechat just outside Vienna and Sedlmayr of Spaten in Munich. The two undertook a long study trip in the 1830’s, mostly to Britain, at the time at the forefront of brewing technology. What they learned allowed them to modernise their breweries and, in the case of Dreher, become the largest brewery on the continent.

Their friendship also brought bottom-fermentation to Vienna. Sedlmayr provided Dreher with yeast after his attempts to brew an English-style Pale Ale in Schewchat had failed. His amber Lager was a huge hit all across Europe, even in the UK. In the 1860’s Dreher’s Lagerbier was being shipped all over the continent and rivalled Bass and Allsopp for international fame.

Which is how Heineken noticed it.  In 1869 there was an international exhibition held in the Paleis for Volksvlijt, not far from Heineken’s new brewery on the Stadhouders kade. Heineken sold beer at the exhibition, but the public were far more interested in what Dreher was selling*. Heineken took note.


Central European Lager styles
Now for a little context. Central Europe was home to many styles if Lager in the second half of the 19th century, some of which no longer exist.

In Bavaria, the styles were, in ascending order of strength:

Winterbier or Schenkbier
Sommerbier or Lagerbier
Export
Märzen
Bock
Doppelbock or Salvator

All of these beers were dark in colour.

Munich beers in 1866
Here are a few analyses of Munich beers in 1866:

Munich Beers in 1866
Brewer Beer Style FG OG ABV App. Atten-uation
Hofbräuhaus Bock Bock 1024.7 1073.7 6.36 66.49%
Salvatorbräu Salvator Bock 1033.3 1076.9 5.61 56.67%
Spatenbräu Bock Bock 1026.8 1077.2 6.54 65.28%
Hofbräuhaus Sommerbier Sommerbier 1014.1 1051.5 4.85 72.62%
Löwenbräu Winterbier Winterbier 1017 1046.1 3.75 63.08%
Source:
"Handbuch der chemischen technologie" by Otto Dammer, Rudolf Kaiser, 1896, pages 696-697
Note the generally poor level of attenuation.

Austrian Lager styles

Austrian Lagers came in similar strength bands to those in Bavaria: Winterbier, Sommerbier ,
Export, Märzen and Bock. Though the colours were quite different to in Bavaria. In Bohemia the majority of Lager were pale in colour, while in Vienna amber was the preferred colour. Though increasingly in Vienna and Austria paler types of Lager became popular towards the end of the century.

Dreher beers in the 1870's
Year Brewer Beer Style Acidity FG OG Colour ABV App. Atten-uation
1870 Schwechat Pilsener Pilsener 0.17 1016.7 1051.3 6 4.48 66.33%
1870 Schwechat ?? Lager 1017.4 1055 10.5 4.87 68.36%
1870 Schwechat Lagerbier Lagerbier 0.13 1017.6 1053.5 6.3 4.65 65.96%
1870 Schwechat Märzen Märzen 0.14 1016.9 1054.7 7.1 4.9 67.95%
1870 Schwechat Export Export 0.13 1017.4 1052.6 6 4.56 65.80%
1870 Schwechat Lagerbier Lager 1017.6 1052.6 4.53 66.54%
1876 Schwechat Export Export 0.13 1018.7 1052.7 4.4 63.22%
1876 Schwechat Bock Bock 1016.6 1068.7 7.23 74.70%
Sources:
"Theory and Practice of the Preparation of Malt and the Fabrication of Beer" Julius E. Thausing, Anton Schwartz and A.H. Bauer, Philadelphia 1882, pages 748-751
Wahl & Henius, pages 823-830



* "Korte Geschiedenis der Heineken's Bierbrouwerij Maatschappij N.V. 1873 - 1948", by H. A. Korthals, 1948, page 29.

Thursday, 28 August 2014

Nürnberg Winterbier and Sommerbier 1886-1887

I'm slowly ploughing my way through the 1903 edition of "Chemie der menschlichen Nahrungs- und Genussmittel". It has over 1,000 analyses of beers, mostly German but with examples from most major brewing countries.

I've already harvested the analyses from a couple of earlier editions, which means there are only 100 or so I need to collect. To add to the 20-odd thousand in my main gravity spreadsheet. It's getting to be quite a collection. Which is sort of the idea.

To quickly recap, in the 19th century Lager was split into two main types, Winterbier and Sommerbier. Before refrigeration, both were brewed in the winter, but the Sommerbier was stronger and lagered for longer because it needed to last through the summer. Sommerbier was also called Lagerbier and Winterbier called Schenkbier.

This is a particularly useful set of analyses because it has the Winterbier and Sommerbier from the same brewery for the same brewing season. Which means we can make meaningful comparisons between Winterber and Sommerbier.

A couple of general observations to begin. I'm shocked at the high lactic acid content of every sample. I'd have expected it to be no higher than 0.1%. Over 0.2% I would have expected to give the beer a detectable tartness. The gravity of most beers is surprisingly high. The strongest Sommerbiers look more like Bocks, with gravities over 1060º and ABVs over 6%. The modern equivalents of these beers - Helles or Dunkles Lagerbier have much lower gravities, usually around 12º Plato or 1048. On its website, Tucher amusingly claims that the recipe for Original Urbräu has been the same for 150 years. Clearly that's bollocks

There are a couple of examples where clearly the same beer has been analysed as both a Sommerbier and a Winterbier: Tucher, Lederer and Lechner.

Nürnberg region Sommerbier in 1886
Brewer Style lactic acid % FG OG ABV App. Atten-uation
Aktien-Br. Nürnberg Sommerbier 0.268 1017.3 1057.0 5.15 69.65%
Aktien-Brauerei Zirndorf Sommerbier 0.26 1017.7 1063.2 5.91 71.99%
Bernreuther (Nürnberg) Sommerbier 0.249 1016.9 1055.9 5.06 69.77%
Bernreuther (Nürnberg) Sommerbier 0.225 1015.8 1059.5 5.69 73.45%
Denk (Nürnberg) Sommerbier 0.234 1013.3 1064.7 6.71 79.44%
Dummet (Nürnberg) Sommerbier 0.241 1015 1062.2 6.15 75.88%
Dürst jun. (Nürnberg) Sommerbier 0.238 1016.4 1063.0 6.06 73.97%
Dürst sen. (Nürnberg) Sommerbier 0.199 1016.4 1048.8 4.19 66.39%
Dürst sen. (Nürnberg) Sommerbier 0.215 1015.5 1053.5 4.93 71.03%
Gaismann (Fürth) Sommerbier 0.203 1014.5 1055.4 5.31 73.83%
Grüner (Fürth) Sommerbier 0.243 1016.6 1059.8 5.61 72.24%
Humbser (Fürth) Sommerbier 0.222 1014.5 1057.9 5.65 74.96%
Lechner (Nürnberg) Sommerbier 0.196 1018.3 1063.2 5.84 71.04%
Lechner (Nürnberg) Sommerbier 0.198 1020 1054.1 4.40 63.03%
Lederer Sommerbier 0.202 1018 1058.5 5.25 69.23%
Lederer Sommerbier 0.246 1017.5 1055.4 4.91 68.41%
Liebel (Nürnberg) Sommerbier 0.227 1017 1058.4 5.38 70.89%
Loewen-Bräu (Müller) (Nürnberg) Sommerbier 0.283 1019.8 1057.1 4.83 65.32%
Mailänder (Fürth) Sommerbier 0.23 1017.5 1058.4 5.30 70.01%
Reif (Nürnberg) Sommerbier 0.26 1016.8 1057.1 5.23 70.58%
Schmauser & Weinmann (Nürnberg) Sommerbier 0.289 1015.3 1056.7 5.38 73.02%
Seiderer & Worlein (Nürnberg) Sommerbier 0.23 1015.8 1057.8 5.46 72.66%
Strebel (Nürnberg) Sommerbier 0.224 1015 1058.4 5.65 74.32%
Süss (Nürnberg) Sommerbier 0.253 1017.4 1060.0 5.53 71.00%
Tucher Sommerbier 0.272 1017 1057.8 5.30 70.59%
Tucher Sommerbier 0.247 1016.5 1051.7 4.56 68.09%
Zeltner (Nürnberg) Sommerbier 0.236 1017.5 1060.2 5.54 70.91%
Average
0.237 1016.6 1058.0 5.37 71.17%
Source:
Chemie der menschlichen Nahrungs- und Genussmittel by Joseph König, 1903, pages 1102 - 1156.


Nürnberg region Winterbier in 1887
Brewer Style lactic acid % FG OG ABV App. Atten-uation
Aktien-Br. Nürnberg Winterbier 0.235 1018.5 1055.9 4.84 66.91%
Aktien-Brauerei Zirndorf Winterbier 0.194 1017.8 1053.0 4.55 66.42%
Bernreuther (Nürnberg) Winterbier 0.249 1016.9 1055.9 5.06 69.77%
Denk (Nürnberg) Winterbier 0.199 1015 1052.4 4.85 71.37%
Dorn (Vach) Winterbier 0.206 1013.2 1048.5 4.58 72.78%
Dreykorn (Lauf) Winterbier 0.281 1017.2 1055.1 4.91 68.78%
Dummet (Nürnberg) Winterbier 0.228 1015.8 1055.0 5.09 71.27%
Dürst jun. (Nürnberg) Winterbier 0.23 1016.6 1051.3 4.49 67.64%
Dürst sen. (Nürnberg) Winterbier 0.199 1015.3 1047.6 4.19 67.86%
Humbser (Fürth) Winterbier 0.21 1017 1052.2 4.56 67.43%
Lechner (Nürnberg) Winterbier 0.198 1020 1054.1 4.40 63.03%
Lederer Winterbier 0.246 1017.5 1055.4 4.91 68.41%
Liebel (Nürnberg) Winterbier 0.228 1017.5 1056.0 4.99 68.75%
Loewen-Bräu (Müller) (Nürnberg) Winterbier 0.233 1015.8 1053.8 4.93 70.63%
Mailänder (Fürth) Winterbier 0.259 1016.5 1058.6 5.46 71.84%
Reif (Nürnberg) Winterbier 0.229 1015.5 1054.0 5.00 71.30%
Schmauser & Weinmann (Nürnberg) Winterbier 0.221 1017 1051.7 4.49 67.12%
Seiderer & Worlein (Nürnberg) Winterbier 0.252 1015 1048.0 4.28 68.75%
Strebel (Nürnberg) Winterbier 0.243 1017.5 1055.4 4.91 68.41%
Süss (Nürnberg) Winterbier 0.279 1014.9 1054.5 5.14 72.66%
Tucher Winterbier 0.247 1016.5 1051.7 4.56 68.09%
Zeltner (Nürnberg) Winterbier 0.236 1014.7 1059.6 5.85 75.34%
Average
0.232 1016.4 1053.6 4.82 69.30%
Source:
Chemie der menschlichen Nahrungs- und Genussmittel by Joseph König, 1903, pages 1102 - 1156.

As you'd expect, the Sommerbiers have a higher average gravity: 1058 compared to 1053.6. So a difference of 4.4 points. But there was considerable variation across different breweries. Ranging from a negative 0.3 points at Mailänder to a massive 11.7 points at Dürst junior. Interestingly the average FGs are almost identical at 1016-ish. The inevitable consequence of which is that the degree of attenuation of Winterbiers is lower. Modern Lagerbiers are very different, averaging well over 80% apparent attenuation.

lactic acid % FG OG ABV App. Atten-uation
average Sommerbier 0.237 1016.6 1058.0 5.37 71.17%
average Winterbier 0.232 1016.4 1053.6 4.82 69.30%
difference 0.20 4.4 0.55 1.88%

The Sommerbiers range from 1048.8 to 1064.7 and the Winterbiers from 1047.6 to 1059.6. Which means that the weaker Sommerbiers have a lower OG than many Winterbiers. It's a lot more variation than you would see in British beers of the same type from the same region. Though 14 of the 28 samples of Sommerbier had a gravity within two points of the average. For Winterbier, that was 13 of 23.

Unfortunately there's nothing about hopping rates. So I can't confirm that Sommerbier was more heavily hopped than Winterbier.

I'm sure I'll be worrying you with plenty more from "Chemie der menschlichen Nahrungs- und Genussmittel". It's so full of information.