Showing posts with label Bokbierfestival. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Bokbierfestival. Show all posts
Tuesday, 1 November 2016
Random Dutch beers (part forty-seven) - special Bokbier Festival edition
It's become a bit of tradition for me to drag Dolores to the Bokbier Festival each year.
Our plan is simple, arrive when it opens on Saturday, grab two of the three seats provided and bugger off again when it starts getting crowded. It works pretty well. The biggest challenge is avoiding the inevitable stinkers amongst the beers. Quite literally stinkers. I've learned some of the breweries to avoid, but there's always an element of risk.
I play it very safe to start with:
SNAB Ezelenbok 7.5% ABV
Darkish brown. Liquorice, sweetish, dark fruits. Not bad.
Rubelijn Herfstbok 7% ABV
Metallic and slightly odd tasting.
Dolores doesn't like either. So she nips off to the HEMA to get some orange juice. We've brought a plastic glass with us for this very eventuality. Dolores mixes her dodgy beer with orange juice.
"Much better," she says, "like an alcopop."
While she's finishing her alcopop I fetch another beer for myself:
Erik's Bier Imperial Stoute Chocolade Bok 9.5% ABV
Black. Does what it says on the tin. Very stouty and chocolatey.
Dolores: "Definitely chocolatey. Tastes much better than the stuff I diluted with orange juice. This one is like oil."
"Do you like it?"
"The other one was worse."
Animal Army Howling Wolf 6.8% ABV
Supposedly English in style. Fairly light brown. Sweet and vegetably.
Dolores: "It's OK."
Me: It's got an odd vegetably flavour. Like boiled cabbage."
Dolores: "Does it? I can't taste it."
Another conservative choice from me:
Emelisse Autumn Doppelbock 11% ABV
Mid brown. Smoke, smoke, smoke. And toffee.
Dolores (pulls a a funny face): "I don't know about that. Don't write down everything I say. I hate that."
She's not keen on the beer.
I've got Dolores what should also be a safe bet.
Lindeboom Herfstbock 6.5% ABV
Pale-ish brown. Much sweeter than I remember. Not quite as bad as Grolsch Bok, but going that way.
Dolores: "It's like burned sugar. Candy sugar. We had these orange lump things when we were kids. Really crap, cheap sweets."
Me: "Most of the sweets we had as kids were just pure sugar with lurid colouring."
Kleiburg Quadrupel Bock 13% ABV
Pretty black. Smells like an ash tray. Tastes like cheap bourbon that's been used to wash out an ash tray.
Dolores: "Tastes like pipe cleaner. It's far too strong."
Me: "What do you think?"
Dolores: "I couldn't drink that. Could you?"
Me: "It's 13%. I'll give it a try."
Me: "If you gulp it quickly you can hardly taste it. Just don't sniff, whatever you do."
I force it down and fetch another Emelisse.
Oudaen Herfstbock 7% ABV
Me: "How is it?"
Dolores: "OK."
SNAB Ijsbock 9%
I always save this until last. Mmm. Full of alcoholly goodness.
Dolores (pulls face): Quite sour, isn't it?
Me: "I don't find in particularly sour."
It's getting crowded so we pack up and go.
Our plan is simple, arrive when it opens on Saturday, grab two of the three seats provided and bugger off again when it starts getting crowded. It works pretty well. The biggest challenge is avoiding the inevitable stinkers amongst the beers. Quite literally stinkers. I've learned some of the breweries to avoid, but there's always an element of risk.
I play it very safe to start with:
SNAB Ezelenbok 7.5% ABV
Darkish brown. Liquorice, sweetish, dark fruits. Not bad.
Rubelijn Herfstbok 7% ABV
Metallic and slightly odd tasting.
Dolores doesn't like either. So she nips off to the HEMA to get some orange juice. We've brought a plastic glass with us for this very eventuality. Dolores mixes her dodgy beer with orange juice.
"Much better," she says, "like an alcopop."
While she's finishing her alcopop I fetch another beer for myself:
Erik's Bier Imperial Stoute Chocolade Bok 9.5% ABV
Black. Does what it says on the tin. Very stouty and chocolatey.
Dolores: "Definitely chocolatey. Tastes much better than the stuff I diluted with orange juice. This one is like oil."
"Do you like it?"
"The other one was worse."
Animal Army Howling Wolf 6.8% ABV
Supposedly English in style. Fairly light brown. Sweet and vegetably.
Dolores: "It's OK."
Me: It's got an odd vegetably flavour. Like boiled cabbage."
Dolores: "Does it? I can't taste it."
Another conservative choice from me:
Emelisse Autumn Doppelbock 11% ABV
Mid brown. Smoke, smoke, smoke. And toffee.
Dolores (pulls a a funny face): "I don't know about that. Don't write down everything I say. I hate that."
She's not keen on the beer.
I've got Dolores what should also be a safe bet.
Lindeboom Herfstbock 6.5% ABV
Pale-ish brown. Much sweeter than I remember. Not quite as bad as Grolsch Bok, but going that way.
Dolores: "It's like burned sugar. Candy sugar. We had these orange lump things when we were kids. Really crap, cheap sweets."
Me: "Most of the sweets we had as kids were just pure sugar with lurid colouring."
Kleiburg Quadrupel Bock 13% ABV
Pretty black. Smells like an ash tray. Tastes like cheap bourbon that's been used to wash out an ash tray.
Dolores: "Tastes like pipe cleaner. It's far too strong."
Me: "What do you think?"
Dolores: "I couldn't drink that. Could you?"
Me: "It's 13%. I'll give it a try."
Me: "If you gulp it quickly you can hardly taste it. Just don't sniff, whatever you do."
I force it down and fetch another Emelisse.
Oudaen Herfstbock 7% ABV
Me: "How is it?"
Dolores: "OK."
SNAB Ijsbock 9%
I always save this until last. Mmm. Full of alcoholly goodness.
Dolores (pulls face): Quite sour, isn't it?
Me: "I don't find in particularly sour."
It's getting crowded so we pack up and go.
Friday, 20 November 2015
Dutch Dubbelbock 2015
The last in my series spun from this year’s Bokbierfestival programme. It’s a much shorter set than the others, with only 11 examples. Ten really, as one is just the 2014 of the same beer, Duits & Lauret Rook Dubbelbock.
Mommeriete and Zeeburg are the only to that were bottom-fermented. Which struck me as odd. Surely Brand can't be top-fermented, s the programme claims?
I have to start off with the term Dubbelbock itself. It’s a mix of Dutch and German. Proper Dutch would be Dubbelbok, proper German Doppelbock. You’ll note that none of the beers below uses either. I can only think of one explanation. Everyone is copying the name of Brand Dubbelbgock, the first beer of this type brewed in Holland.
According to the German definition, a Doppelbock should have a minimum OG of 18º Plato. Something all the beers in the table managed, except for Duits & Lauret and Bijdehand. With a gravity of 26º Plato, Emelisse have some justification for tacking on an Imperial to their beer’s name. It has the highest OG and highest ABV of any of the beers at this year’s festival.
A quick comparison with my other two categories is illuminating. Unsurprisingly the average OG of the Dubbelbocks is easily the highest. More surprisingly, it’s FG is only slightly higher, giving it this group the highest degree of attenuation. Not what I would have guessed at all.
That Dubbelbock is both darker and more bitter on average makes lots of sense. Though there is considerable variation amongst the individual beers for both. Which means I’m not sure you can read too much into the averages.
Time for the tables.
Maybe I’ll be arsed to do the foreign Bocks.
Mommeriete and Zeeburg are the only to that were bottom-fermented. Which struck me as odd. Surely Brand can't be top-fermented, s the programme claims?
I have to start off with the term Dubbelbock itself. It’s a mix of Dutch and German. Proper Dutch would be Dubbelbok, proper German Doppelbock. You’ll note that none of the beers below uses either. I can only think of one explanation. Everyone is copying the name of Brand Dubbelbgock, the first beer of this type brewed in Holland.
According to the German definition, a Doppelbock should have a minimum OG of 18º Plato. Something all the beers in the table managed, except for Duits & Lauret and Bijdehand. With a gravity of 26º Plato, Emelisse have some justification for tacking on an Imperial to their beer’s name. It has the highest OG and highest ABV of any of the beers at this year’s festival.
A quick comparison with my other two categories is illuminating. Unsurprisingly the average OG of the Dubbelbocks is easily the highest. More surprisingly, it’s FG is only slightly higher, giving it this group the highest degree of attenuation. Not what I would have guessed at all.
That Dubbelbock is both darker and more bitter on average makes lots of sense. Though there is considerable variation amongst the individual beers for both. Which means I’m not sure you can read too much into the averages.
Time for the tables.
| type | OG Plato | FG Plato | ABV | App. Atten-uation | Colour (EBC) | bitterness (EBU) |
| top-fermenters | 17.17 | 3.90 | 7.18 | 78.64% | 67.6 | 30.7 |
| bottom-fermenters | 16.83 | 4.20 | 6.86 | 76.37% | 54.2 | 30.4 |
| Dubbelbock | 19.2 | 4.30 | 8.33 | 79.31% | 71.8 | 35.5 |
| 2015 Dutch Duppelbock | ||||||||
| Year | Brewer | Beer | OG Plato | FG Plato | ABV | App. Atten-uation | Colour (EBC) | bitterness (EBU) |
| 2015 | Pelgrim | Pelgrim Dubbelbock | 19.3 | 2.94 | 9.00 | 85.71% | 95 | 30 |
| 2015 | De Lepelaer (H) | Beemster Dubbelbock | 18 | 3.35 | 8.00 | 82.44% | 40 | 75 |
| 2015 | Bijdehand (H) | Provenier Dubbelbock | 17.8 | 3.50 | 7.80 | 81.40% | 80 | 25 |
| 2014 | Duits & Lauret | Rook Dubbelbock 2014 | 18.0 | 4.08 | 7.60 | 78.52% | 70 | 27 |
| 2015 | Brand | Brand Dubbelbock | 18.0 | 4.27 | 7.50 | 77.50% | 65 | 27 |
| 2015 | Emelisse | Emelisse Imperial Dobbel-bock | 26.0 | 6.78 | 11.00 | 75.77% | 45 | 45 |
| 2015 | Duits & Lauret | Rook Dubbelbock | 17.5 | 60 | 28 | |||
| 2015 | Molenduyn (H) | Dubbelbock | 85 | 36 | ||||
| 2015 | Reuzenbieren (H) | ReuZ Dubbelbock | 100 | 35 | ||||
| 2015 | Mommeriete | Gramsbarger Dubbelbock | 18 | 4.27 | 7.50 | 77.50% | 65 | 38 |
| 2015 | Zeeburg (H) | Zeeburg Dubbelbock | 20 | 5.17 | 8.20 | 75.62% | 85 | 25 |
| Average | 19.2 | 4.30 | 8.33 | 79.31% | 71.8 | 35.5 | ||
| Source: | ||||||||
| Bokbierfestival programme 2015, pages 24 - 28. | ||||||||
Maybe I’ll be arsed to do the foreign Bocks.
Sunday, 15 November 2015
2015 Top-fermenting Dutch Bok
Tables – dontcha just love ‘em? I do, as you’ve probably already gathered. I really do have a thing about numbers. Can’t get enough of them.
You really wouldn’t want to see what goes on in my head. It even looks weird to me. But I’m digressing like a digressing stick.
My second look at the 2015 Bock crop is focused on top-fermenting examples. It’s a sign of the transformation of Dutch brewing that these greatly outnumber their bottom-fermenting counterparts. 63 to 29, if you’re interested. Though neither of those totals includes beers labelled Doppelbock.
Once again, a couple of the beers fall outside the parameters of a Dutch autumn Bok. Anything under 15º Plato is too low in gravity. And anything with a colour value below 30 is way too pale.
Though the two beers with the highest EBU value were both top-fermenters, there’s nothing to pick between the average bitterness of them and the bottom-fermenters. Most of the other averages are also pretty close, with the top-fermenters slightly higher in gravity and ABV. The biggest difference is in the colour, where the bottom-fermenters are significantly paler. Take a look:
I’m having arsing issues again so I’ll leave you with all the pretty numbers lined up neatly in rows.
Just Doppelbock to go.
You really wouldn’t want to see what goes on in my head. It even looks weird to me. But I’m digressing like a digressing stick.
My second look at the 2015 Bock crop is focused on top-fermenting examples. It’s a sign of the transformation of Dutch brewing that these greatly outnumber their bottom-fermenting counterparts. 63 to 29, if you’re interested. Though neither of those totals includes beers labelled Doppelbock.
Once again, a couple of the beers fall outside the parameters of a Dutch autumn Bok. Anything under 15º Plato is too low in gravity. And anything with a colour value below 30 is way too pale.
Though the two beers with the highest EBU value were both top-fermenters, there’s nothing to pick between the average bitterness of them and the bottom-fermenters. Most of the other averages are also pretty close, with the top-fermenters slightly higher in gravity and ABV. The biggest difference is in the colour, where the bottom-fermenters are significantly paler. Take a look:
| type | OG Plato | FG Plato | ABV | App. Atten-uation | Colour (EBC) | bitterness (EBU) |
| top-fermenters | 17.17 | 3.90 | 7.18 | 78.64% | 67.6 | 30.7 |
| bottom-fermenters | 16.83 | 4.20 | 6.86 | 76.37% | 54.2 | 30.4 |
I’m having arsing issues again so I’ll leave you with all the pretty numbers lined up neatly in rows.
| 2015 Top-fermenting Dutch Bok | ||||||||
| Year | Brewer | Beer | OG Plato | FG Plato | ABV | App. Atten-uation | Colour (EBC) | bitterness (EBU) |
| 2015 | Openluchtmuseum Goye Goet | Herfstbock | 14.5 | 3.30 | 6.00 | 78.24% | 104 | 17 |
| 2015 | Apeldoornse Bierbrouwerij DeVlijt | Veluws Schavuyt Bockbier | 14.7 | 2.58 | 6.50 | 83.24% | 52 | 30 |
| 2015 | Leidsch Bier | Pumpkin Raisin Bock | 14.9 | 2.05 | 6.90 | 86.95% | 47 | 37 |
| 2015 | 't IJ | Ijbok | 14.9 | 2.79 | 6.50 | 82.16% | 17 | 24 |
| 2015 | Van de Streek (H) | Black Bock | 14.9 | 3.73 | 6.00 | 76.05% | 66 | 57 |
| 2015 | De Eem (H) | Eem Bok | 15.0 | 2.89 | 6.50 | 81.63% | 65 | 37 |
| 2015 | Erik's Bier | Erik's Zwarte Piet bokbier | 15.5 | 1.20 | 7.70 | 92.71% | 90 | 31 |
| 2015 | Gringel (H) | Valkenburgse Gringelbock | 15.5 | 3.43 | 6.50 | 78.93% | 40 | 25 |
| 2015 | Scheldebrouwerij | Wilde Bok | 15.5 | 3.43 | 6.50 | 78.93% | 40 | 24 |
| 2015 | Hertog Jan | Hertog Jan Bockbier | 15.9 | 3.86 | 6.50 | 76.87% | 100 | 23 |
| 2015 | Kompaan (H) | Weizen bock | 15.9 | 3.86 | 6.50 | 76.87% | 140 | 41 |
| 2015 | Attemer Brouwerij | Attemer Bock | 16.0 | 3.04 | 7.00 | 81.93% | 69 | 26 |
| 2015 | Groningse Bierbrouwerij (H) | Hunebed bock | 16.0 | 3.04 | 7.00 | 81.93% | 70 | 30 |
| 2015 | Jopen | 4 Granen Bok Bier | 16.0 | 3.04 | 7.00 | 81.93% | 22 | |
| 2015 | Koningshoeven | La Trappe Bockbier | 16.0 | 3.04 | 7.00 | 81.93% | 95 | 34 |
| 2015 | Maximus | Maximus Bock 7 | 16.0 | 3.04 | 7.00 | 81.93% | 75 | 35 |
| 2015 | Hemel | Rookbok | 16.0 | 3.96 | 6.50 | 76.41% | ||
| 2015 | Hemel | Oerbok | 16.0 | 3.96 | 6.50 | 76.41% | ||
| 2015 | Troost | Bok | 16.2 | 3.81 | 6.70 | 77.63% | 55 | 38 |
| 2015 | De Vriendschap | Hopbock | 16.3 | 4.11 | 6.60 | 75.97% | 26 | 41 |
| 2015 | EleganT | EleganT Bruintje | 16.4 | 1.99 | 7.80 | 88.51% | 81 | 38 |
| 2015 | Largum | Guur | 16.4 | 2.46 | 7.55 | 85.83% | 62 | 37 |
| 2015 | Bax (H) | Oma's pruim oude bok | 16.5 | 4.31 | 6.60 | 75.10% | 59 | 29 |
| 2015 | Berging Brouwerij (H) | Koe Bok | 16.5 | 4.50 | 6.50 | 73.98% | 57 | 31 |
| 2015 | Jantjes Bieren (H) | Udens Bockbier | 16.5 | 4.50 | 6.50 | 73.98% | 35 | 33 |
| 2015 | Pauw | Pauw's Herfsttrots | 16.7 | 4.71 | 6.50 | 73.07% | 80 | 18 |
| 2015 | Snab (H) | Ijsbok | 16.9 | 0.31 | 9.00 | 98.27% | 100 | 32 |
| 2015 | Snab (H) | Ezelenbok | 16.9 | 3.08 | 7.50 | 82.73% | 90 | 32 |
| 2015 | Breugems (H) | Saense bock | 16.9 | 4.01 | 7.00 | 77.46% | 72 | 28 |
| 2015 | Bourgondische brouwers (H) | Willem de duitser | 17.0 | 3.01 | 7.60 | 83.27% | 94 | 34 |
| 2015 | Mieghehn | Bokkendonks Bokbier | 17.0 | 3.55 | 7.30 | 80.18% | 65 | 36 |
| 2015 | Klein Duimpje | Slobberbok | 17.0 | 3.74 | 7.20 | 79.11% | 85 | 32 |
| 2015 | De Vriendschap | Tarwebok | 17.0 | 4.11 | 7.00 | 77.02% | 40 | 20 |
| 2015 | Groningse Bierbrouwerij (H) | Brandaris Blonde Bock | 17.0 | 4.11 | 7.00 | 77.02% | 60 | 20 |
| 2015 | Groningse Bierbrouwerij (H) | Kruisheren Constatinus Bock | 17.0 | 4.11 | 7.00 | 77.02% | 20 | 40 |
| 2015 | Linden boom | Herfslbock | 17.0 | 4.11 | 7.00 | 77.02% | 80 | 22 |
| 2015 | t Volen | Valenbock | 17.0 | 5.04 | 6.50 | 71.71% | 100 | 23 |
| 2015 | Hommeles (H) | Bokkepruik | 17.0 | 66 | 30 | |||
| 2015 | Oudaen | Oudaen Herfstbock | 17.4 | 4.54 | 7.00 | 75.20% | 75 | 21 |
| 2015 | Wageningen | Mordicus | 17.4 | 4.54 | 7.00 | 75.20% | 60 | 22 |
| 2015 | Texelse | Texels Bock | 17.8 | 4.36 | 7.33 | 76.76% | 56 | 26 |
| 2015 | Rodenburg | Bronkhorster Usselbock | 18.0 | 5.19 | 7.00 | 72.57% | 50 | 26 |
| 2015 | Witte Leeuw (H) | Oktober 23 | 18.0 | 5.74 | 6.70 | 69.60% | 90 | 24 |
| 2015 | Het roze varken | Wintervacht | 18.3 | 4.59 | 7.50 | 76.24% | 63 | 51 |
| 2015 | Oldskool (H) | Einbockish | 18.5 | 6.64 | 6.50 | 65.76% | 40 | 32 |
| 2015 | t Wort Wat (H) | Polderbock | 18.7 | 4.30 | 7.90 | 78.27% | 77 | 31 |
| 2015 | Rock city beers (H) | Bockalade | 19.0 | 2.61 | 9.00 | 87.12% | 160 | 30 |
| 2015 | De Arn (H) | Bokkige Arn | 19.0 | 4.43 | 8.00 | 77.97% | 60 | 30 |
| 2015 | Gooische biergilde (H) | De blauwe bock | 19.0 | 4.44 | 8.00 | 77.94% | 80 | 28 |
| 2015 | Jopen | Johannieter | 20.0 | 3.70 | 9.00 | 82.62% | 22 | |
| 2015 | Oldskool (H) | Shut the Bock up | 20.0 | 5.17 | 8.20 | 75.62% | 10 | 20 |
| 2015 | Rodenburg | Brok in de keel | 20.5 | 5.17 | 8.50 | 76.26% | 37 | 53 |
| 2015 | Texelse | Texels Stormbock | 21.0 | 3.01 | 10.00 | 86.66% | 67 | 24 |
| 2015 | 't IJ | Dubbelbok | 21.0 | 3.91 | 9.50 | 82.60% | 52 | 25 |
| 2015 | De Prael | Herfstbock | 21.0 | 7.14 | 7.70 | 67.77% | 60 | 29 |
| 2015 | Praght | Praght bokbier 2 | 22.7 | 9.33 | 7.50 | 60.96% | 80 | |
| 2015 | Naeckle brouwers | Naeckte bok | 7.50 | |||||
| 2015 | Blauwe Ijsbeer (H) | Weijsbeer bock | 6.00 | |||||
| 2015 | Dampegheest | Dampegheest bockbier | 7.00 | |||||
| 2015 | Oijen | Oijens Bockbier | 6.00 | |||||
| 2015 | Pampus | Bokshoorn | 6.80 | |||||
| 2015 | Praght | Ftevobock | 7.50 | 50 | 28 | |||
| 2015 | Ramses | Ramses Bok | 7.00 | 88 | 59 | |||
| Average | 17.17 | 3.90 | 7.18 | 78.64% | 67.6 | 30.7 | ||
| Source: | ||||||||
| Bokbierfestival programme 2015, pages 24 - 28. | ||||||||
Just Doppelbock to go.
Monday, 9 November 2015
2015 Bottom-fermenting Dutch Bok
There’s something I really like about the Bokbierfestival programme: it has pretty complete technical specs for the beers. OG, ABV, colour and bitterness. Dead handy for a numbers freak like me.
Which is why it’s surprising that it’s taken me so long to harvest any of this lovely data. A decade or two. What was I thinking of? With my scanner and OCR software, I had everything safely in a spreadsheet in a jiffy. Once there, I could start playing with it. As you do.
Now I’ve got the formula for converting Plato to SG coded, I can do all sorts of clever things. Well, not really, but I can flip around between the two systems. The main manipulation I’ve done is to calculate the FG and degree of attenuation. The sort of crap I’m usually – or perhaps unusually would be more appropriate – interested in.
I’ve decided to split them into two groups: top- and bottom-fermenting. When I decided on that I thought it would be a neat way of dividing the old from the new. Expecting all the examples from older breweries to be Lagers, and those from the new boys not. I was caught out by many beers falling into an unexpected group.
I’m still not sure whether I believe that Brand Dubbelbock is really top-fermented. It’s also odd that some breweries with multiple Boks – Oldskool and Pelgrim, for instance – have examples that are both top- and bottom-fermented. So I’m not totally sure what my split has achieved.
I’ve excluded beers explicitly called Dubbelbok, though have left in ones whose gravity is in the right range (>18º Plato) but are just called Bok.
Though it’s nice to have a number for bitterness, the table demonstrates how careful you have to be with such figures. Of the traditional Boks, Grolsch looks on paper the most bitter. Yet I know from experience the opposite is true. Grolsch Bok in undrinkably sweet, coming over more like an Imperial Oud Bruin, full of artificial sweetener.
Overall, the average is very much like the classic Bok spec: 16 to 16.5º Plato, 6.5% ABV. Quite a few beers are on the pale side. I’d consider anything under 40 to be struggling to fit the style. I thought there were actually rules about the colour and OG in Holland for autumn Bok.
That’s me done, so here’s the table:
(H) means contract brewed.
I wish I could be arsed to go through th 20-odd Bokbierfestival programmes I have to pull out the full historic data. But I've other more urgent bollocks, let alone the arsing.
Top-fermenters next time.
Which is why it’s surprising that it’s taken me so long to harvest any of this lovely data. A decade or two. What was I thinking of? With my scanner and OCR software, I had everything safely in a spreadsheet in a jiffy. Once there, I could start playing with it. As you do.
Now I’ve got the formula for converting Plato to SG coded, I can do all sorts of clever things. Well, not really, but I can flip around between the two systems. The main manipulation I’ve done is to calculate the FG and degree of attenuation. The sort of crap I’m usually – or perhaps unusually would be more appropriate – interested in.
I’ve decided to split them into two groups: top- and bottom-fermenting. When I decided on that I thought it would be a neat way of dividing the old from the new. Expecting all the examples from older breweries to be Lagers, and those from the new boys not. I was caught out by many beers falling into an unexpected group.
I’m still not sure whether I believe that Brand Dubbelbock is really top-fermented. It’s also odd that some breweries with multiple Boks – Oldskool and Pelgrim, for instance – have examples that are both top- and bottom-fermented. So I’m not totally sure what my split has achieved.
I’ve excluded beers explicitly called Dubbelbok, though have left in ones whose gravity is in the right range (>18º Plato) but are just called Bok.
Though it’s nice to have a number for bitterness, the table demonstrates how careful you have to be with such figures. Of the traditional Boks, Grolsch looks on paper the most bitter. Yet I know from experience the opposite is true. Grolsch Bok in undrinkably sweet, coming over more like an Imperial Oud Bruin, full of artificial sweetener.
Overall, the average is very much like the classic Bok spec: 16 to 16.5º Plato, 6.5% ABV. Quite a few beers are on the pale side. I’d consider anything under 40 to be struggling to fit the style. I thought there were actually rules about the colour and OG in Holland for autumn Bok.
That’s me done, so here’s the table:
| 2015 Bottom-fermenting Dutch Bok | ||||||||
| Year | Brewer | Beer | OG Plato | FG Plato | ABV | App. Atten-uation | Colour (EBC) | bitterness (EBU) |
| 2015 | Alfa | Alfa Bokbier | 16.5 | 4.50 | 6.50 | 73.98% | 47.5 | 26 |
| 2015 | Amstel | Amstel Bock | 16.5 | 3.58 | 7.00 | 79.39% | 70 | 28 |
| 2015 | Bavaria | Bok | 16.5 | 4.50 | 6.50 | 73.98% | 75 | 26 |
| 2015 | Bekeerde Suster | Gewaeghde Bock | 16.5 | 4.50 | 6.50 | 73.98% | 60 | 26 |
| 2015 | Budels | Herfstbock | 16.0 | 3.96 | 6.50 | 76.41% | ||
| 2015 | Christoffel (H) | Christoffel Bok | 20.3 | 6.21 | 7.80 | 71.02% | 70 | 30 |
| 2015 | De Leckere | Rode toren | 16.1 | 4.07 | 6.50 | 75.88% | 53 | 30 |
| 2015 | De Noordt | Nooriit Bok | 16 | 3.04 | 7.00 | 81.93% | 45 | 25 |
| 2015 | Emelisse | Emelisse Herfslbock | 16.5 | 4.50 | 6.50 | 73.98% | 45 | 17 |
| 2015 | Grolsch | Grolsch Herfstbok | 16.5 | 4.50 | 6.50 | 73.98% | 70 | 30 |
| 2015 | Groningse Bierbrouwerij (H) | Grunn Bock | 17.0 | 4.11 | 7.00 | 77.02% | 100 | 40 |
| 2015 | Huttenkloas (H) | Winterbock | 17.0 | 3.20 | 7.50 | 82.19% | 46 | 30 |
| 2015 | Kaf en koren (H) | De rook van Rotterdam | 16.6 | 4.61 | 6.50 | 73.49% | 43 | 35 |
| 2015 | Koperen Kat | Delltse Donderslag | 15.4 | 2.41 | 7.00 | 85.17% | 45 | 43 |
| 2015 | Maallust | Landloperbock | 16.5 | 4.13 | 6.70 | 76.13% | 62 | 32 |
| 2015 | Mommeriete | Mommeriete Rookbock | 16.5 | 4.13 | 6.70 | 76.13% | 60 | 32 |
| 2015 | Muifelbrouwerij (H) | D'n Ossebock | 16 | 3.04 | 7.00 | 81.93% | 35 | 25 |
| 2015 | Oedipus | Speciale Bock | 19 | 6.26 | 7.00 | 68.63% | 35 | 25 |
| 2015 | Oersoep | Sexy motherbocker | 16 | 3.04 | 7.00 | 81.93% | 35 | |
| 2015 | Oldskool (H) | Reinheitsgebok | 19.5 | 4.98 | 8.00 | 75.88% | 44 | 50 |
| 2015 | Pelgrim | Pelgrim Bockbier | 16.6 | 5.53 | 6.00 | 68.11% | 70 | 30 |
| 2015 | Sallandse landbrouwerij | Bokkige Theodorus | 17 | 3.20 | 7.50 | 82.19% | 46 | 30 |
| 2015 | Scheveningen | Scheveninger Herfstbock | 16.5 | 4.50 | 6.50 | 73.98% | 65 | 30 |
| 2015 | Sint Jutternis | Tilburgs bock 2015 | 16.7 | 3.98 | 6.90 | 77.32% | ||
| 2015 | Spierbier | Gespierde bock | 16 | 4.16 | 6.40 | 75.19% | 24 | 25 |
| 2015 | Wispe brouwerij | Wispe bock | 17 | 4.11 | 7.00 | 77.02% | 57 | 30 |
| 2015 | Zeven Deugden | Bock en Sprong | 18 | 4.27 | 7.50 | 77.50% | 34 | 30 |
| 2015 | Gulpener | Gulpener Herfslbock | 16.5 | 4.50 | 6.50 | 73.98% | ||
| Average | 16.83 | 4.20 | 6.86 | 76.37% | 54.23 | 30.40 | ||
| Source: | ||||||||
| Bokbierfetival programme 2015, pages 24 - 28. | ||||||||
(H) means contract brewed.
I wish I could be arsed to go through th 20-odd Bokbierfestival programmes I have to pull out the full historic data. But I've other more urgent bollocks, let alone the arsing.
Top-fermenters next time.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



































