| Title |
Efficient and precise programmable DNA knock-in without double-strand breaks
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, July 2026
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41586-026-10819-7 |
| Authors |
Yanmin Gao, Yu Ma, Kexin Yu, Yintian Liu, Buming Gu, Hao Tang, Wenjie Yan, Shuangshuang Yang, Jingran Su, Xindong Wang, Xin Ma, Xinming Wang, Fang Wang, Qingyang Li, Mengying Liu, Haifeng Wang |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 54 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 11 | 20% |
| United States | 8 | 15% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 2 | 4% |
| Lebanon | 1 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
| Poland | 1 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Russia | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 27 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 45 | 83% |
| Scientists | 9 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2026.
All research outputs
#1,774,358
of 33,235,300 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#44,077
of 115,999 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,189
of 176,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#321
of 562 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,235,300 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 115,999 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 96.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 562 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.