ani.social
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • Aquileo | heart
    Support Lemmy
  • Aquileo | search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
QuantumSpecter@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months ago

UK to “encourage” Apple and Google to put nudity-blocking systems on phones

arstechnica.com

Aquileo | external-link
Aquileo | message-square
18
Aquileo | link
Aquileo | fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • technology@lemmy.world
  • europe@feddit.org
119
Aquileo | external-link

UK to “encourage” Apple and Google to put nudity-blocking systems on phones

arstechnica.com

QuantumSpecter@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 8 months ago
Aquileo | message-square
18
Aquileo | link
Aquileo | fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • technology@lemmy.world
  • europe@feddit.org
Government seeks “nudity-detection algorithms” in iOS and Android, report says.
Aquileo | alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • atrielienz@lemmy.world
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    42
    ·
    8 months ago

    No. You don’t get to decide what is put on my personal computing device just because you want to force the general public to bear the burden of protecting children rather than forcing parents to do their fucking jobs.

    • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      18
      ·
      8 months ago

      Damn right. I paid for the device, it’s mine and I can use it solely to take pictures of my bare ass should I choose so. There’s of course, and for a reason, limitations on how I can use those pictures, but those apply to any device capable of taking a photo of anything. But I can still use pictures of my ass as a wallpaper in my own home if I want to.

    • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      They don’t get to decide if you refuse, otherwise they do get to decide.

  • Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    40
    ·
    8 months ago

    In the last century, every single one of the UK ministers pushing for this level of censorship were either gasp gay, or pedophiles. Would not surprise me if this trend continued

    • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      13
      Aquileo | arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      So, “virtue” signaling? That’s my only guess.

      • setVeryLoud(true);@lemmy.ca
        Aquileo | link
        Aquileo | fedilink
        English
        Aquileo | arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 months ago

        Projection.

  • twinnie@feddit.uk
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    21
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    They should make it a law to require adequate parental controls to exist on a phone in a way that parents can use them, then teach the parents how to use them. If your kid goes and starts viewing porn then it’s your own fault.

    • IllNess@infosec.pub
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      18
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yes, let parents be parents.

      But we all know this is about control and not about protecting children. Sickening.

    • aurelar@lemmy.ml
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      That would make too much sense.

  • FelixCress@lemmy.world
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    15
    ·
    8 months ago

    Oh, fuck off.

  • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    14
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    They already exist on the iPhone. Take a nude. Try and use the cutout feature. Find that you’re absolutely not able to do it. Now find a non nude picture and use the cutout feature. Find that you can absolutely use it.

    This stuff is already enacted right now on iPhone.

    • MurrayL@lemmy.world
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      12
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yep, and the option to filter them is already in settings and has been for some time.

      • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
        Aquileo | link
        Aquileo | fedilink
        English
        Aquileo | arrow-up
        8
        Aquileo | arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        And turning it off or on makes no effect. No matter what, it is not possible on an iPhone to use many photo features if the photo is of a nude person.

    • FelixCress@lemmy.world
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      7
      Aquileo | arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      A good reason to avoid IPhone. Or any other company trying to control your life.

      • SaltySalamander@fedia.io
        Aquileo | link
        Aquileo | fedilink
        Aquileo | arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        100%

    • The Octonaut@mander.xyz
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      3
      Aquileo | arrow-down
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Assuming the cutout feature works by AI and requires you send your photo to their server, it makes a lot of sense that Apple don’t want you sending your nads to their server.

      • PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca
        Aquileo | link
        Aquileo | fedilink
        English
        Aquileo | arrow-up
        11
        ·
        8 months ago

        No it’s processed on device. You can even try this with airplane mode. The cutout feature still works even for new photos taken while offline. There is on-device processing of nudes.

  • shalafi@lemmy.world
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    7
    ·
    8 months ago

    I’d stand with Big Tech on this one.

    “Make me. Dare ya. We’ll pull all UK sales and block your island off the face of the planet. See how that works for ya at the polls. We’re done here.”

Technology@lemmy.world

technology@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@lemmy.world

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


  • @L4s@lemmy.world
  • @autotldr@lemmings.world
  • @PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks
  • @wikibot@lemmy.world
Visibility: Public
Aquileo | globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 4.33K users / day
  • 8.93K users / week
  • 15.4K users / month
  • 31.2K users / 6 months
  • 135 local subscribers
  • 86.8K subscribers
  • 21K Posts
  • 929K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • L3s@lemmy.world
  • enu@lemmy.world
  • Technopagan@lemmy.world
  • L4sBot@lemmy.worldB
  • L3s@hackingne.ws
  • BE: 0.19.20
  • Modlog
  • Legal
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org