On why truth still really matters
It’s been a long while since I wrote anything for this blog – November last year, in fact, when I wrote a post mourning the passing of Phil Rickman, whose novels contained a huge amount of truth, but which were not, technically, “true” stories. There’s a plethora of reasons why I haven’t written. We moved house in March, to a new area, new parishes and new challenges; three days after the move, we suffered a major bereavement. Moving house is considered one of the most stressful of human experiences anyway; bereavement even more so. As a result of the intense physical, mental, emotional and spiritual upheavals, I have slipped into what’s best described as prolonged burn-out. All of the removals boxes have been emptied, the house is more or less sorted (though we have a rolling process of sorting and letting go of stuff and we are never, ever, ever putting anything in a loft again, EVER.) but I’m struggling hugely. We have a massive new garden to care for (it’s like living in a forest glade; we get deer, even) and I am trying to make sense of why I, in particular, am here. I haven’t the energy or inclination to get out and do things, so I suspect making new friends is going to take a long time, if ever, to happen. I feel what’s probably a sort of ennui about life in general, and am averse, even repelled, by most of the activities suitable for people my age and situation in life. I find I am exhausted by being among human beings and the noise, smells, sensations and everything are too bright, too vivid, too overwhelming, to endure for long.
But that’s not the only reason why I haven’t been writing here. A couple of years ago I noticed that occasionally my blog stats would spike massively; it happens from time to time still and I realised it’s probably being strip mined for content, to feed into the algorithms that “teach” AI. Two of my novels have been used (without my consent) for the same purpose. Many of my blogging friends have moved over to Substack because you can ensure a limited amount of strip-mining because you can make posts subscription only; you can even monetise your substack. I have not done this; there have been various ethical concerns about Substack (I cannot recall details, sorry) but everything has been moving over to such models, to the extent that it’s very hard to find things to read online that don’t require that you sign up for them. Even the free ones require your details in some way and that bothers me a lot. You cannot just browse anonymously among the news sources and cross-reference facts; yes, there are browsers you can use for that but they are clunky and subject to other risks and biases.
What has prompted me to write this is the furore over the memoir by Raynor Winn, called “The Salt Path” which spawned several sequels and even a film that was released this year. I read the book last year, I think, and was unimpressed overall. I read it while staying at my best friend’s home; a friend of hers had loaned it to her. If I recall correctly, she did not ask to borrow it; it was offered. That concerns me more now than it did then, because as someone with a chronic illness, we’re often subject to well-meaning friends suggesting potential cures for our illness, and since one of the elements of “The Salt Path” is that Raynor’s husband Moth experiences remission of symptoms of a degenerative disease he’s been diagnosed with, as a result of them walking the 600 odd miles of the south west coastal path. It’s become a sort of touchstone for many people, seeing it as touchstone for the power of the human spirit to overcome anything. If you have not come across the controversy yet, it’s this: that the book, a memoir, may not be entirely true. An investigative journalist delved deeply into the back story and found some glaring issues. I will not go into it further for obvious reasons.
This controversy itself is concerning enough but I have read endless comment threads that concern me a great deal more. People who basically say, who cares, what does it matter, it’s a good story, it helped me, get a life, it’s a book so it doesn’t have to be true (NB: I believe that publishers ask authors of memoirs to sign a declaration of truth before publishing). Around 2/3 of the comments I have read have actively declared they do not care about truth. This ties in with my observation of a similar phenomenon I have seen on social media, of pages putting out fake stories with hideous fake AI pictures, and people reacting to being told it’s none of it real or true with “I don’t care, I like it, why does it matter that it’s AI?” Especially if the picture is cute. AI trains its “art” by strip-mining art and photos on the internet, without consent. Actual photographers and artists are being exploited. And the results of the AI “art” are manifold. Leaving aside loss of income to creators(not to mention the resources than use of AI gobbles up), one of the biggest results is people cannot tell what is real and what is fake. I’ve probably been very, very annoying on Facebook for pointing out when a photo is an AI abomination. I have an excellent memory and knowledge of the natural world, of plants and animals, and an equally excellent knowledge of world history and so on; this means that I spot quite rapidly when something is wrong or out of kilter.
People have commented on the “Salt Path” controversy that many authors and artists in the past were not exemplary people, missing the point entirely that a memoir is expected to be true (leaving aside the fact that we all see our own stories from a particular point of view) and that publishers legally have to ensure that it is. We are not talking about anything to do with artistic license or human error. This book has been taken to the hearts of many thousands of people because it fitted a narrative they needed: that a human being can by dint of sheer will power and determination, overcome anything, even terminal illness. Discovering that the book, billed as a true story, may be anything but true, or worse, flawed by potential unethical, even criminal, behaviour, has made many people react by saying they don’t care about truth, and that upsets me. Everywhere I look these days there are untruths masquerading as truth and the results are horrifying. The blight that is Brexit came about because people were fed lies, especially about the EU. I could go on, and list many but I am deeply tired. I am tired of people being children, of their unmet needs being manipulated by the unscrupulous so that we are becoming less and less able to discern reality and recognise truth. There’s often more truth in honest fiction than there is now in many elements of life.
I have no solution. Doubtless this blog will provoke some discussion, some disagreement. All I can really say is that I believe that truth is a thing that needs to be upheld. The saying, “Truth is the daughter of time” is probably no longer helpful, especially as some of the things that are being lied about (such as those whose agenda means they aim to discredit human-made climate breakdown) are time sensitive. Yes, I suspect many people will discover unequivocally that they have been lied to and rather than accept it, they will double down and nail their colours to the mast of the ship of lies, because people find it very difficult to say, “I was wrong. I was misled.”
In the past the undermining of truth was a very real tool in the toolbox of fascism. Aided by a host of 21st century tech, it’s still proving to be very useful today. Take a stand and uphold truth where you are.
Peace out.



