• 0 Posts
  • 2.18K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
Aquileo | cake
Cake day: December 29th, 2023

Aquileo | help-circle

  • Pup Biru@aussie.zonetoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldHell yeah.
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    weirdly i was actually thinking about this the other day and i don’t think it’d go back to that state of affairs. i think we already have an example of what it’s turn into: US emergency departments

    they can’t refuse to treat anyone but someone’s on the hook for hundreds of thousands of dollars of inflated costs. if you don’t have insurance, you’re in debts

    i imagine it’d be the same with a non-socialist fire department: they show up to a building and put it out as normal and can’t refuse… 95% of people have fire insurance, and if you don’t you’re in fire debt that costs more than the building they “saved” - and then it still probably has to get torn down because of the damage

    and then they’d still justify it saying that they protected the buildings around you which you’d be responsible for repairing if they didn’t put the fire out so it’s not even about your building


  • I’m saying if there’s 1000x more lines of code than necessary, it’s unmaintainable slop. I could understand 2x or even 10x the lines of code just being a difference in architecture, but even 100x is getting crazy.

    and i’m saying who’s to say what’s necessary with the linux kernel? it’s a one of a kind project: the largest software undertaking by humanity, ever

    there probably are 100x more LOC than technically necessary… heck there are… how many LOC in the linux kernel? millions? there’s n-1 more LOC than necessary because it’s C and can be a one-liner (hell even python can be a one liner if you turn it into something resembling brainfuck more than python)

    what are you comparing 2x, 10x, 100x to? bsd? windows? neither are particularly good comparisons because linux is so much more capable (in many respects) than either, and solves different problems of scale that either too

    linux has no point of comparison for a simple LOC metric… the only thing we can judge is the output itself: its efficient to run, velocity of new features is great, bug count is low for a project of its size, and tech debt gets paid down

    again, i think given those factors it wouldn’t matter if linux were 100x the LOC that it actually is: it is the benchmark that other things are measured against

    LOC has always been, and will remain a terrible metric for anything except number of newline characters in a source repo




  • Pup Biru@aussie.zonetolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldLinux source code leaked
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    5
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    if it’s a partnership with microsoft, imo it’s an awful idea… to me it reads as:

    everyone knows linux is secure AF… way more secure than windows in many contexts, so it sets you up in the “wait this is BS” mindset

    the logical next step that you make, imo, is that the argument that closed source is more secure than open source in other contexts should be viewed with similar scepticism: office/libreoffice, onedrive/nextcloud, etc

    (which is true: closed source software is often far more insecure than open source software)







  • whilst that’s certainly 1 interpretation, there’s also a bunch of other facets

    what people are usually referring to is cultural similarity

    it could be argued that said cultural similarities is due to imperialism, but almost all of human history is imperialism if you look deep enough and it’s not useful to just label everything like that

    in fact, using imperialism in an over-broad way blunts any discussion on the very real, and to-this-day continuing effects