I think that we all knew that didn’t we?

It’s simply not possible to do that. It’s not Monopoly where a single entity owns the rights to it. People can just create a new game body or even play without one.

We listen to quite a bit of true crime podcasts and it really is frightening.

The one that we are listening to now is called “Earwitness” and it all hinges on someone claiming to have overheard a phone call where the suspect supposedly confessed to the murder. The other person on the line said that the suspect never said that at all.

There was no actual physical evidence of him committing the crime. Just a few witness statements one of which was changed so many times due to the bad interview techniques used by the cops and the other being this person who was paid to testify about the phone call.

‘Our game’ lmfao Nobody owns football.

It depends upon how you interpret ‘our’ as it’s pretty vague. It means ‘belonging to us’ but I think that ‘us’ literally means everyone in the world except FIFA in this context.

I used to dislike guacamole until I went to Mexico and tasted guacamole with more lime juice than I’d previously had.

Well, I don’t think that they’ll be acting on the interests of the United States as such.

So it’s only illegal if you intend to commit a criminal offense.

That’s how I read it too but it does depend upon the wording of 202a and 202b that define what a criminal offence is in this context.

Except that if the ICC issues arrest warrants for US officials, then any country that is subject to the court, is now obligated to arrest those people if they ever set foot in those countries.

That’s already failed because I’m pretty sure that several countries have said that they won’t arrest Netanyahu.

Wrong community. I think that there’s an actually infuriating one somewhere.

I did do it a while ago with my system when I managed the remote access myself and remember it to be a bit of a faff.

I moved Internet providers and the new one didn’t have inbound traffic enabled so it stopped working. Rather than go through the hassle of contacting support to allow incoming traffic I signed up for Nabu Casa. It was a lot easier than setting up the security myself and it made Alexa integration trivial.

https://support.nabucasa.com/hc/en-us/articles/25619363899677-Configuring-Amazon-Alexa-to-work-with-Home-Assistant

So if an annual or monthly fee is an option then it’s worth considering.

Why do you think that I was trying to make it better?

You can make a quiet call if you have headphones or earphones but I find that people (myself included) tend to talk louder on a call than they do in person. I’m sure that it’s not necessary but it happens anyway.

I think that Turkey’s obvious response is to recognise the Palestinian genocide.

It has a lot of content that isn’t available anywhere else. Sometimes the best option is still shit.

Same here. For a trial period I kept the ST hub but as soon as was happy with home assistant the ST went.

You’re right. It often comes from the previous game but if that game doesn’t do well then the chances of there being another are greatly reduced.

Ideally, the restaurant should pay enough that tipping is not required (which does require them to raise prices). As a customer you would then be free to tip a smaller amount if you thought that the service was exceptional.

That’s how it works in the UK although a lot of businesses are adding a tip onto the bill in advance so that you would need to complain about the service to get it removed (technically you can just ask them to remove the tip without giving a reason if that’s how you want to play it).

You can, for example, give one an instruction to do something. After it has done it, you ask the other (verbal) hemisphere why they just did that, and they immediately make up a plausible-sounding explanation despite the scientists knowing it’s not the actual reason.

Sounds like AI got something right then.

It should be illegal to buy a company on loan and transfer that debt to the company. You should be required to get your money back via dividends or by building the company up and reselling it.

It’s only meaningless if you’re pedantic.

It obviously means the greatest of all time so far because at the time you make the statement you cannot judge what hasn’t happened yet.

It gets more complicated when you’re saying it about a company or game in the past but I still think that it has meaning. It could mean that at the time, they were the greatest of all time (up until that point in time) but it could also mean that at this point in time that past version of EA was the greatest of all time (up until now, which is beyond the time that that version of EA existed).