You must log in or register to comment.
Because they did discovery and found out he is indeed a googly-eyed chud?
I have not read the article or anything, but my guess is that you’re allowed to insult public figures based on visible things about them without having to face a lawsuit over it because first amendment.
And I’m pretty sure the judge looked at him and was like, “you are a googly-eyed chud”. Like, he just told you the truth. You can’t sue someone for telling you the truth.
What a fuckin loser.
Technically he’s a Googly-Eyed kremlin bitch, but chud works too
Prove that you aren’t, Kash.
Cheers!!! to the headline author, this is simply perfection. No notes.
