you sweet summer flower

deleted by creator

man did i hate that doctor/warrior whatever in whatever star trek that was, to intense, convoluted and frankly with his PTSD shouldnt be on ship in that senior compacity. Or perhaps I only see that actor doing that feral screaming from the first Dune

dont forget the tech either, i dont know how reliable this is, but seems like it would be something i would look in on if times ever got tough for me

While it is technically possible to scan radio frequencies used by Target’s loss prevention (Asset Protection) teams, doing so is generally discouraged and comes with significant legal risks.Discussions on Reddit (such as on the r/lossprevention and r/amateurradio communities) highlight the following key points:Frequency Types: Target and other large retailers primarily use business-band UHF radios for internal communications, with known frequencies and configurations documented on RadioReference Wiki.Legal and Policy Risks: While merely listening to unencrypted store radio channels may not be explicitly illegal depending on your jurisdiction, attempting to transmit, disrupt, or use those communications to evade security is a federal offense.Corporate Surveillance: Target’s Asset Protection team relies heavily on sophisticated camera networks, floor monitoring, and centralized tracking. They often track habitual theft over a long period rather than relying strictly on radio chatter to identify suspects

those are probably just the ones that made the news, just figure if they happen to see a recording, that mustache, wig, or facial scar could be reasonable doubt on camera. Heck pirate some shows of Face Off and steal some cosmetic supplies and make it a family hobby to apply make up, shit now I sort of want to do that.

I would like to see the jury try to convict me with a facial scar from that person’s time in the war, hit up the thrift shops to create the assembles and be tear away so can make quick getaways if they tried to grab you. Also stretches, stay limber, and dont forget your cardio

change up your appearance, places like target will record you, let you build up enough in stolen goods it becomes a felony then bust you, AI is giving them a way to audit multiple locations and build up dossiers

good! fuck everybody else, my children need wine

in efforts to avoid the ban, ai modelers have started naming their models TrumpIsGreat or TrumpIsNotAPedo to sway the mercurial rapist felon octogenarian

or china and russia start disabling them in orbit

if you watch the drone combat sub on reddit, it is a turkey shoot and has been for well over a year. Bleak, graphic and bloody footage of first POV of human after human getting blowed up by an angry mosquito or a 2 liter bottle filled with explosives dropped from above. Sooo many, and the worst are the ones who only get injured and take their own lives than suffer any longer, all caught on drone video…Its frightening to know what the future of warfare looks like and how effective it is against walking meat sacks

you are going by v1 desciptions of llm’s, your estimate of where they are at currently is far outdated

i do too, but its still a bit conflicted since its owned by another studio

Since January 2010, Rotten Tomatoes has been owned by Flixster, which was in turn acquired by Warner Bros. in 2011. In February 2016, Rotten Tomatoes and its parent site Flixster were sold to Versant’s (then NBCUniversal’s) Fandango ticketing company.[10] Warner Bros. retained a minority stake in the merged entities, including Fandango.[

LLM’s are search engines by their nature, but on top of that they have search engines they reference, they have powerful grepping and search tools to iterate through those results come up with the prevailing theories and outliers and present that as an organized report to you, unless you can find something that is factually incorrect about my statement you are arguing against what you are seeing with your eyes which i dont quite get

they are great for doing a lot of web research into complex subjects, create an inventory of the most provelant discussions and historical precedents and form all that into an easy to read report. Since the llm is not the source of knowledge but the search engine, your comment is absolutely worthless as a coherent reply to my post

pretty sure as soon as the strategic reserve is at minimum levels the gas prices will pop the economy just like in 08, looking at fuel prices, there is some consensus that the derivatives bubble and the economy was accelerated or contributed by the big spike then too, for what its worth here is a snippet from a longer conversation with claude the other day about the timing and effects…

“The timing is on your side. Oil peaked around $147 in July 2008, but Lehman didn’t collapse until September 15, and the bulk of the crash to the $30s happened over September–December, right on top of the acute credit panic. So the dominant driver of that specific collapse was the financial crisis — a credit freeze, a global trade contraction, forced deleveraging, and a stampede out of commodity speculation — not primarily consumers and firms conserving because gasoline got expensive. Presenting $147→$30s as a clean “high price destroyed demand” story conflates a financial/credit event with a price-response event, exactly as you say. Fair hit. The honest nuance is that they’re entangled rather than fully separable. James Hamilton — probably the leading economist on oil-and-macro — argued in a 2009 Brookings paper that the oil spike itself was a meaningful contributor to the recession, not just a bystander: US miles driven and gasoline demand had already rolled over in late 2007 and early 2008, before Lehman, and the auto-heavy parts of the economy were buckling under fuel costs first. His stronger claim was that the oil shock alone might have produced a recession even without the financial crisis. That’s a contested, minority-leaning view — the mainstream reading is still that the financial crisis dominated — but it means high oil wasn’t innocent; it was one of the stressors loading an already over-levered system. So the two didn’t just coincide, they reinforced each other. And here’s the deeper point your question exposes, which is worth more than the correction itself: it’s genuinely hard to find a clean example of price-alone demand destruction, because oil spikes and recessions almost always travel together. Spikes help cause recessions, and recessions crush oil demand, so they arrive as a package — you rarely get to observe the price-conservation channel in isolation. That entanglement is real, and I was papering over it. The cleaner illustration of the structural piece — the permanent kind of demand destruction — is the aftermath of the 1970s shocks. Global and especially US oil demand fell durably through the early 1980s and didn’t recover for years: fuel economy standards, switching oil out of power generation and home heating, industrial efficiency. That’s the sliver that sticks even after the economy recovers, and it’s isolatable precisely because it persisted past the recovery — though even there the Volcker recession is a confounder, so it’s not perfectly pure either. So let me refine the claim rather than abandon it. 2008 is a fine illustration that a demand collapse crashes the oil price, but a poor illustration that the high price alone caused the collapse. My underlying point — that $150–200 oil is self-limiting — still holds, but the mechanism is better stated as: high oil prices help trigger or deepen a recession, and/or a coincident recession does the demand-crushing, and it’s that demand collapse (from whatever mix of causes) that breaks the price. Pure price-induced conservation is the slower, structural component I described last turn, not the fast circuit-breaker. The circuit-breaker is the recession — which, as you’re implying, may have its own separate ignition source and just happens to also torch oil demand on the way down.”

pretty compelling videos tho, i put it up there with netflix documetnary qualtiy

they respected the lemon pound cake tho…

or an off balance girlfriend who threatens this if you dont come out and talk to her more than once

once more into the breach