Not while zionism lasts.

They painted natural wood and stone. I am having a panic attack over how much irreversible damage they inflicted on that historic space.

Here is a proper source.

https://linuxiac.com/linux-desktop-market-share-surpasses-10-in-north-america/

Both Statcounter and Cloudflare seem to agree that Linux now makes up 10% of traffic, which is not quite the same thing as desktop market share.

If you cannot control the software on the device — including the OS — then you never bought it. You paid for it, but you did not buy it and therefore do not own it.

The level of open corruption on display is astounding. It is my fault for thinking a police department or district attorney would respect the rights of whistleblowers. ACAB

I propose 192.168.0.42

God Emperor Leta II Corntreides

You have wonderful taste.

Think about what they get by controlling a popular package manager. Think about what you give them.

You will not feel the consequences directly.

UV’s parent company was purchased by OpenAI.

I recommend Poetry instead.

That’s sweet. You are penguins.

Talk like that will get you put on a secret four-dimensional list.

If you have mushrooms in your car it is not evidence unless it is discovered during a lawful search as required by due process. Cops cannot just randomly search cars or any other property without cause.

Hypothetical things are not evidence, regardless of whether they may or may not exist. The phone and any data on it was not evidence because the authorities had no legal or constitutional right or cause to search it.

Since the phone was wiped, there is no data. This means even the hypothetical was-never-evidence data still is not evidence, because it is literally the absence of evidence. This is as much “destruction of evidence” as the last time you emptied your computers trash folder.

I am waiting for the Motorola Graphene phones. Now that AI has fucked all technology on the planet for the foreseeable future, I am not sure if I will ever actually see one. Never mind own one.

Is it really “little known” that destroying evidence is illegal?

I suspect you are attacking the article’s lack of awareness and precision, but I applaud them for not echoing the fascist government’s carefully crafted and fictitious propaganda narrative.

The government attempted to illegally and unconstitutionally search a person’s personal property. They had no cause, no suspicion, and no warrant. There was no evidence to begin with and no evidence to delete. What a person does with their own property and data is not the business of the government outside of due process. No evidence was deleted because nothing was evidence. The accusation is a work of fiction meant to punish someone for exercising their rights in the face of abuse.

The “protector” part is unnecessary. Of course he is going to protect himself.

Listen, I am not one to kink shame.

It’s @[email protected] isn’t it? It’s not a mystery, we already know.

Account Age: 39 minutes

Who cares what you think? This whole shitposts community is a hoard of fags (except a few)

Bye Felicia.