I’m just wondering what the statute of limitations is here. Are you still gonna be in your farewell thread next week? Next month?
I’ll probably check up intermittently as long as it’s active, and when it’s inactive, I won’t be here. Sorry that you think it’s regulated by some law?
Don’t worry, I’ll block you again soon. I know you can’t resist engaging with me.
Cute coming from someone who unblocked me specifically to engage with me. :)
I responded to your dogshit any time I see it, regardless of whether or not you had me blocked, so I don’t know what you think that blocking me changed, lmao.
Typically people leave after saying goodbye but ok.
I responded to your dogshit any time I see it, regardless of whether or not you had me blocked, so I don’t know what you think that blocking me changed, lmao.
Well, when I see you baselessly accuse me of things, I of course reply to defend myself. And then you reply and we get into the whole thing where I keep asking you to provide a shred of evidence to substantiate your beliefs, and you reply that one must not test our Lord God the State Department and that blessed is he who believes the US government without having seen and skepticism is the tool of the devil, blah blah blah. And since you can’t seem to resist preaching your holy gospel or chastising the faithless skeptics, I think I’m making it harder for you to abide by your decision to leave. So, for both of our sakes, I will now block you again.
Typically people leave after saying goodbye but ok.
Imagine going to a farewell party and being surprised that the person leaving is attending, lmao.
And then you reply and we get into the whole thing where I keep asking you to provide a shred of evidence to substantiate your beliefs, and you reply that one must not test our Lord God the State Department and that blessed is he who believes the US government without having seen and skepticism is the tool of the devil, blah blah blah.
Cute, considering that you’ve been in numerous disputes on that matter, and were provided with reliable sources which you rejected as “Adrian Zenz” despite the fact that the vast majority of the evidence provided in said sourceshad nothing to do with Zenz.
But hey, genocide deniers aren’t here because you listen to evidence. You’re here because you’re fascist bootlickers who love the slaughter of minorities, as long as it’s by ‘your’ camp.
So, for both of our sakes, I will now block you again.
Don’t know why you felt the need to announce that since pretty clearly blocking me is apparently meaningless to you, but okay.
The Nazis also accused people of being delusional, stop using Nazi talking points!
denying any evidence presented
What evidence presented? None was.
Even then, it’s perfectly legitimate to reject evidence of something if said evidence is not credible. I’m sure flat earthers could present me with countless, rambling sources to back up their claims, but those sources would fail any sort of rational, critical evaluation.
Hey, where’s the evidence that I was shown in that thread? The evidence you claim exists, but can’t seem to link to?
I really have to thank you for proving my point. You lie, you make claims without evidence, not only regarding what’s happening in the world, but even here, online, where people can see it for themselves. You lied because that’s what y’all do. Thank you for discrediting yourself.
Imagine saying this as an Uyghur genocide denier and PRC bootlicker.
Aren’t you supposed to be logging off? Now that you’ve noticed I’ve unblocked you, I doubt you’ll be able to stay away for a week.
Didn’t you claim to have me blocked?
Sorry that I’m active in my fucking farewell thread, I know that’s such a radical idea.
lmao.
I did have you blocked. I unblocked when I heard you left.
Your farewell thread from two days ago? Quite the Southern Goodbye.
What’s the logic there, I’m curious. Other than, of course, the usual logic of repeating blatant misinformation and genocide denial wherever you can?
Sorry that you think a thread is timed like a real-world conversation? lmao.
I prefer to keep a short blocklist.
I’m just wondering what the statute of limitations is here. Are you still gonna be in your farewell thread next week? Next month?
Don’t worry, I’ll block you again soon. I know you can’t resist engaging with me.
I’ll probably check up intermittently as long as it’s active, and when it’s inactive, I won’t be here. Sorry that you think it’s regulated by some law?
Cute coming from someone who unblocked me specifically to engage with me. :)
I responded to your dogshit any time I see it, regardless of whether or not you had me blocked, so I don’t know what you think that blocking me changed, lmao.
Typically people leave after saying goodbye but ok.
Well, when I see you baselessly accuse me of things, I of course reply to defend myself. And then you reply and we get into the whole thing where I keep asking you to provide a shred of evidence to substantiate your beliefs, and you reply that one must not test our Lord God the State Department and that blessed is he who believes the US government without having seen and skepticism is the tool of the devil, blah blah blah. And since you can’t seem to resist preaching your holy gospel or chastising the faithless skeptics, I think I’m making it harder for you to abide by your decision to leave. So, for both of our sakes, I will now block you again.
Imagine going to a farewell party and being surprised that the person leaving is attending, lmao.
Cute, considering that you’ve been in numerous disputes on that matter, and were provided with reliable sources which you rejected as “Adrian Zenz” despite the fact that the vast majority of the evidence provided in said sources had nothing to do with Zenz.
But hey, genocide deniers aren’t here because you listen to evidence. You’re here because you’re fascist bootlickers who love the slaughter of minorities, as long as it’s by ‘your’ camp.
Don’t know why you felt the need to announce that since pretty clearly blocking me is apparently meaningless to you, but okay.
PJ can’t rest when MLs write delusional shit on the Internet.
Saying that I won’t believe things without evidence is the exact opposite of “delusional shit.”
Removed by mod
The Nazis also accused people of being delusional, stop using Nazi talking points!
What evidence presented? None was.
Even then, it’s perfectly legitimate to reject evidence of something if said evidence is not credible. I’m sure flat earthers could present me with countless, rambling sources to back up their claims, but those sources would fail any sort of rational, critical evaluation.
Thrashing around like an infant are we? Typical of someone backed into a corner and has no decent arguments in their defense.
Hey, where’s the evidence that I was shown in that thread? The evidence you claim exists, but can’t seem to link to?
I really have to thank you for proving my point. You lie, you make claims without evidence, not only regarding what’s happening in the world, but even here, online, where people can see it for themselves. You lied because that’s what y’all do. Thank you for discrediting yourself.
Aunt Rainbow took over MWOG. You may as well be talking to goat on voat.
looks at modlog and sees your lengthy rapsheet of bans for trolling Well that explains a lot. You are just here to waste time.
See other comment. You are the one being dishonest here.
Removed by mod