captainlezbian, captainlezbian@lemmy.world

Instance: lemmy.world
Joined: 3 years ago
Posts: 1
Comments: 6716

    RSS feed

    Posts and Comments by captainlezbian, captainlezbian@lemmy.world

    Defederation is often seen as a last resort and generally seen pretty negatively. Defederating everyone would also get rid of most content


    Yep, you don’t incur the wrath of their violence, you just make governing you not worth the effort


    Yeah the stupid, silly, and more adventurous flirtation is usually in certain types of space, but when I see it happening I feel so at home. Two girls making eyes at each other over a stupid feat of strength or toughness or whatever else gets me to let my guard down



    Such a shame it had to be there and not here… I could’ve had a particularly fun workout today


    Yeah, unfortunately I’ve dealt with both the extremes of leftists, and I really don’t know who I find more insufferable, the overly academic navel gazers or the “only get intoxicated and smash, no read or unionize” rabblerousers

    Fortunately I’ve also known plenty of folks who know Proudhon from Trotsky and recognize that the eternal struggle for justice is both intellectual and physical, that we can and should continue striving for a better society and discussing what went wrong and how to improve things as well as trying new things and doing what we can to make the world suck a little less


    In this case it pertains to how the app spent years cultivating an atmosphere indicating discretion. That’s why last time I thought about it (a decade ago) it was mostly popular for sending nudes.

    My position here is that the government has been pressuring private companies to give them all the warrantless data they want. And I think they shouldn’t be allowed to ask. Hell I think they should need a warrant to view surveillance data unless someone in the incident consents or the owner of the data is the accuser.

    Now I acknowledge that those two paragraphs allow this situation. But I also think that we shouldn’t be holding a reasonable expectation of privacy to what a privacy advocate thinks, it should be what an ordinary citizen and user of a service thinks. In that case, either I’m old and out of touch since my sending tit pics over Snapchat days are long past (I am) and this woman had an atypical expectation of privacy. Or Snapchat isn’t properly expressing to users the degree of surveillance they’re under and this should be taken as private communication and Snapchat should be forced to either change their surveillance levels or work to ensure that the average user understands the level of surveillance they’re under.

    So yeah I think this is mostly a consumer rights issue, but it’s also an issue of the government keeps asking for data on private citizens that they shouldn’t be allowed to collect themselves and I don’t think they should even be allowed to ask



    The problem is that the sum is positive, limited (with changing limits), and unknown. Everyone can benefit, but you can’t have everyone do better you still get everything you could possibly want. But you can get everything you could possibly want by keeping others from having enough, and since you can’t know the limit you can’t easily be held accountable


    Well of course we should support the international proletariat, even the ones heavily propagandized to the right such as in Russia and the US.


    How hot is the person that told me to jump? How bad of a fall does it look like?


    As an English speaker yeah we should switch back to runes


    First we must define the limits of various traits to firmly understand exactly what counts as a knish. I will take the anarchic position as I had to look up what a knish is and now I’d like to engage in some conquest for that bread


    Except that’s all gender rather than the article function (distinguishing if something is specific or generic). A language without articles doesn’t distinguish between “get in the car” and “get in a car” and instead rely on the person listening to know whether there’s a specific car to get into


    I just assume anyone not using articles is a Roman

    Internet Romanis plenum est


    People are talking about the real vs artificial, but there’s another component here. Many sweets have vanilla regardless of if they have any other flavorings. This results in it being very similar to cheese is on pizza, where you only call it cheese because it’s only cheese.


    Yeah, part of what I appreciate about him is that he does consistently acknowledge when he fucks up and tries to change.


    Nope, at least not in North America, and it sounds extremely Oceanian, so I’d be surprised if it’s used in the UK


    It was a power pretty heavily implied not to belong to the government. And given thet the 9th says that rights exist beyond those explicitly stated, it should be pretty clear.

    Anyways we must make the implied right to privacy explicit


    Exactly! The joke is fucked up, and yet we deserve the right to reasonable privacy in spaces where we’re told we can expect reasonable privacy (and the right to have spaces with reasonable privacy). Consent for mass surveillance and tyranny is built from situations like this where the question can be shifted to being about what was done under the presumption of privacy rather than the fact that it was violated.


    RSS feed

    Posts by captainlezbian, captainlezbian@lemmy.world

    Comments by captainlezbian, captainlezbian@lemmy.world

    Defederation is often seen as a last resort and generally seen pretty negatively. Defederating everyone would also get rid of most content


    Yep, you don’t incur the wrath of their violence, you just make governing you not worth the effort


    Yeah the stupid, silly, and more adventurous flirtation is usually in certain types of space, but when I see it happening I feel so at home. Two girls making eyes at each other over a stupid feat of strength or toughness or whatever else gets me to let my guard down



    Such a shame it had to be there and not here… I could’ve had a particularly fun workout today


    Yeah, unfortunately I’ve dealt with both the extremes of leftists, and I really don’t know who I find more insufferable, the overly academic navel gazers or the “only get intoxicated and smash, no read or unionize” rabblerousers

    Fortunately I’ve also known plenty of folks who know Proudhon from Trotsky and recognize that the eternal struggle for justice is both intellectual and physical, that we can and should continue striving for a better society and discussing what went wrong and how to improve things as well as trying new things and doing what we can to make the world suck a little less


    In this case it pertains to how the app spent years cultivating an atmosphere indicating discretion. That’s why last time I thought about it (a decade ago) it was mostly popular for sending nudes.

    My position here is that the government has been pressuring private companies to give them all the warrantless data they want. And I think they shouldn’t be allowed to ask. Hell I think they should need a warrant to view surveillance data unless someone in the incident consents or the owner of the data is the accuser.

    Now I acknowledge that those two paragraphs allow this situation. But I also think that we shouldn’t be holding a reasonable expectation of privacy to what a privacy advocate thinks, it should be what an ordinary citizen and user of a service thinks. In that case, either I’m old and out of touch since my sending tit pics over Snapchat days are long past (I am) and this woman had an atypical expectation of privacy. Or Snapchat isn’t properly expressing to users the degree of surveillance they’re under and this should be taken as private communication and Snapchat should be forced to either change their surveillance levels or work to ensure that the average user understands the level of surveillance they’re under.

    So yeah I think this is mostly a consumer rights issue, but it’s also an issue of the government keeps asking for data on private citizens that they shouldn’t be allowed to collect themselves and I don’t think they should even be allowed to ask



    The problem is that the sum is positive, limited (with changing limits), and unknown. Everyone can benefit, but you can’t have everyone do better you still get everything you could possibly want. But you can get everything you could possibly want by keeping others from having enough, and since you can’t know the limit you can’t easily be held accountable


    Well of course we should support the international proletariat, even the ones heavily propagandized to the right such as in Russia and the US.


    How hot is the person that told me to jump? How bad of a fall does it look like?


    As an English speaker yeah we should switch back to runes


    First we must define the limits of various traits to firmly understand exactly what counts as a knish. I will take the anarchic position as I had to look up what a knish is and now I’d like to engage in some conquest for that bread


    Except that’s all gender rather than the article function (distinguishing if something is specific or generic). A language without articles doesn’t distinguish between “get in the car” and “get in a car” and instead rely on the person listening to know whether there’s a specific car to get into


    I just assume anyone not using articles is a Roman

    Internet Romanis plenum est


    People are talking about the real vs artificial, but there’s another component here. Many sweets have vanilla regardless of if they have any other flavorings. This results in it being very similar to cheese is on pizza, where you only call it cheese because it’s only cheese.


    Yeah, part of what I appreciate about him is that he does consistently acknowledge when he fucks up and tries to change.


    Nope, at least not in North America, and it sounds extremely Oceanian, so I’d be surprised if it’s used in the UK


    It was a power pretty heavily implied not to belong to the government. And given thet the 9th says that rights exist beyond those explicitly stated, it should be pretty clear.

    Anyways we must make the implied right to privacy explicit


    Exactly! The joke is fucked up, and yet we deserve the right to reasonable privacy in spaces where we’re told we can expect reasonable privacy (and the right to have spaces with reasonable privacy). Consent for mass surveillance and tyranny is built from situations like this where the question can be shifted to being about what was done under the presumption of privacy rather than the fact that it was violated.