richmondez, mondez@lemdro.id

Sure but then you are just paying somone else to do the piracy for you. I guess it’s cheaper than proper subscriptions but I feel somewhat ideologically opposed to these pay for piracy services that just leech from the ecosystem.

Capitalism for me but not for thee. Arent state enforced monopolies more of a communist thing though?

Isn’t streamio just paying somone else to leech torrents for you and stream you the results? Just grab the show using sonarr or something and delete it if it’s not to your liking.

You don’t expose your NAS, you expose a web server to serve Jellyfin content. Ideally you front it with a reverse proxy.

Seems the proof more or less already existed and the LLM helped the researchers find it and demonstrate it applied to the problem they were researching? Basically doing grunt work literature searches that grad students might have done in the past.

I don’t think back ported security patches should be changing public APIs, are you speaking from actual experience or is that some kind of theoretical problem that might not actually exist or at least isn’t the norm?

Depends on what value of most “users” we are talking. Most users rarely stray outside the browser and I’d say rolling release with the risk of breakage it entails would not suit your average user very well at all.

Power users that are trying to eek out every drop of performance sure.

That is a release engineering issue on the developers side in my opinion though no less real. Developers targeting Linux should target the current version of big LTS releases like debian and Redhat enterprise if they are serious about compatibility beyond “works on my system”

For the vast majority of computer users I’d says debian is fine since most users hardly step out of the browser these days.

Violates copyright of the anti piracy press release,alpha pirate move there.

Hasn’t the output from LLM already been ruled ineligible for copyright protection?

Probably still use the clutch though right rookie?

You are right, they were already doing that but the annoying popups aren’t because of the EU, the sites could just not set cookies to collect data they didn’t need to provide the service by default and not nag you constantly to let them have their way. It’s operation “wear them down” .

The EU didn’t make anyone do that, site that have no business recoding the information put those up as a dark pattern to try and force people into accepting the terms so they can claim informed consent to the tracking. It’s malicious compliance, they could just not collect that tracking data that isn’t required to provide the service.

Copyright gives them a monopoly over (legitimate) distribution so why spend any more than necessary when people can’t go elsewhere for your content.

I’ve met plenty of people who were smart in one very specific domain and dumb as bricks in pretty much all other areas. People around them would praise them from being smart but they just seemed ordinary or even below average outside their niche and I’d never refer to them as being smart myself.

Maybe you are being elitist by putting this guy you knew on a pedestal when outside that one skill he impressed you with he was actually a pretty dumb person.

I wonder how many actual piracy sites they managed to disrupt at the cost of those legitimate ones.

That is still better than no physical release at all as its at least transferrable, but yeah,the servers can be pulled and it made unobtainable if your console storage does.

Fairly sure steam has sufficient access to your system to do just that to the games it installed.

Shocked Pikachu?

Unlike Wikipedia, the references supplied by LLM output often point to material that doesn’t actually support the LLM output. This can be because the LLM misapplies it to the wrong context or because it’s incorrectly correlated and has nothing to do with what the LLM output making it unhelpful for determining the accuracy of the output.