Off-and-on trying out an account over at @tal@oleo.cafe due to scraping bots bogging down lemmy.today to the point of near-unusability.

  • 356 Posts
  • 12.5K Comments
Joined 3 年前
Aquileo | cake
Cake day: 2023年10月4日

Aquileo | help-circle


  • I mean, that’s really true of products in general.

    I think that there are some real consumer law issues to answer where someone buys a product and then a manufacturer can control the product subsequent to the purchase. Like, say I buy a BMW with the expectation that I am not going to be seeing ads, based on the way it acts at the time that I bought it. At that point, I’m locked into owning that BMW. Then the manufacturer degrades my experience, maybe to the point where I no longer consider the vehicle to be the one I wanted.

    Like, what is my remedy here? If the vehicle has OTA updates, I can never know what it’s going to be doing down the line, so I can’t make an informed decision. Having informed consumers is one of the basic requirements for markets to be efficient.

    Maybe I could say “Well, that’s just a case of let the buyer beware. We’ll rely on reputation…some auto manufacturers will piss off consumers and those will be avoided”. But…if someone doesn’t buy cars that frequently, that’s a long iteration cycle.

    I’m actually more concerned about video games. Like, if I’m a publisher, once I sell a video game, I don’t normally have more revenue coming in from it. But if I do have the ability to update that video game down the line. And I can update it to go harvesting user data, which turns it into a revenue stream. A lot of video game publishers go defunct on a regular basis or sell IP or whatnot, so there, even the “rely on reputation” route is more questionable.





  • The governors of Osaka, Fukuoka and Aichi have expressed interest. “Aichi Prefecture and Nagoya possess all the functions necessary to serve as a second capital. I’m the first in the nation to make a bid,” Aichi Governor Hideaki Omura said. Fukuoka Governor Seitaro Hattori added Friday: “We will aim for the designation as ‘all Fukuoka’ by working with municipalities and the local business community.”

    For purely historical value, I gotta say Kyoto.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyoto

    Kyoto is one of the oldest municipalities in Japan, having been chosen in 794 as the new seat of Japan’s imperial court by Emperor Kanmu. …The emperors of Japan ruled from Kyoto in the following eleven centuries until 1869…The capital was relocated from Kyoto to Tokyo after the Meiji Restoration.

    searches

    Aw yeah.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Capital_of_Japan

    As of 2007, there is a movement to transfer the government functions of the capital from Tokyo while retaining Tokyo as the de facto capital, with the Gifu-Aichi region, the Mie-Kio region and other regions submitting bids for a de jure capital. Officially, the relocation is referred to as “capital functions relocation” instead of “capital relocation”, or as “relocation of the Diet and other organizations”.[19][20]

    In 2023, the Government of Japan moved the Agency for Cultural Affairs to Kyoto. This was the first time that a central government office has been relocated outside Tokyo since Tokyo was designated as the capital.[21][22]




  • It’s not very surprising. There’s a legal rationale behind it.

    Certain classes of people are granted privileged communications.

    Lawyers are permitted privileged communications with the people they represent, as those people need to be able to be honest with them about their situation. You cannot compel these communications to be handed over, and I don’t believe that there’s an obligation to report. The idea is that we donlt want communication to break down with lawyers, because thst causes other social harm.

    Similar is also true for certain other relationships, like husband-wife.

    Doctor-patient.

    And I guess there priest-parisoner; priests often provide a similar counsel-and-advise role.

    searches

    https://www.encyclopedia.com/law/encyclopedias-almanacs-transcripts-and-maps/privileged-communication

    Privileged communications exist because society values the privacy or purpose of certain relationships. The established privileged communications are those between wife and husband, clergy and communicant, psychotherapist and patient, physician and patient, and attorney and client.

    These relationships are protected for various reasons. The wife-husband and clergy-communicant privileges protect the general sanctity of marriage and religion. The psychotherapist or physician and patient privilege promotes full disclosure in the interests of the patient’s health. If patients were unable to keep secret communications with psychotherapists or physicians relating to treatment or diagnosis, they might give doctors incomplete information. If doctors received incomplete information, they might be unable to administer health care to the patient, which is the very purpose of the doctor-patient relationship.

    The attorney-client privilege exists for roughly the same reason as the physician-patient privilege. In order to secure effective representation, a client must feel free to discuss all aspects of a case without the fear that her attorney will be called at trial to repeat her statements. Likewise, to retain the client’s trust and do his job properly, the attorney must be allowed to withhold from the court and opposing party private communications with the client.

    A communication is not confidential, and therefore not privileged, if it is overheard by a third party who is not an agent of the listener. Agents include secretaries and other employees of the listener. For example, a communication between a psychotherapist and patient would be privileged even if the psychotherapist’s secretary happened to overhear it. In such a case, the secretary could not be forced to testify about the communication. However, a communication between a psychotherapist and a patient on a public elevator occupied by third parties would not be privileged and could be used in court.




  • It’s absolutely worth requesting your data to be deleted regardless of where you live by claiming to live in California…

    I do think it’s possible that some of them won’t delete your data upon request, failing to comply with the law

    That’s not failure to comply with the law if you don’t actually live in California.

    People have a legal location of residence in the US.

    If you want to establish legal residency in a state, you’re typically looking at doing something like spending the majority of the year there.

    EDIT: I’d also be pretty confident, though the article doesn’t talk about it, that California won’t normally have jurisdiction for California state law unless a data broker is doing business in California, and that that will also be a constraining factor. Like, if a data broker company is only doing business in, say, Russia, the US will not enforce rulings against them regarding California state law in general.






  • Yeah, I currently have a pen with about a 50% water-Nitrogen mix. It sheens less like that, but at least it isn’t infuriating to use as a regular writing ink that way — doesn’t hard-start if I stop writing for a handful of seconds.

    I pretty much entirely use fountain pens for writing, not doing decorative signatures or whatnot. Being pretty is really just a fun plus for me; what’s most-important is that it be pleasant to write with. Having the very-most-sheeniest of inks isn’t really terribly important, just fun.

    Nitrogen seems like a very light Cyan that is super saturated, so diluting it might change the underlying hue to something you won’t like.

    It shows up as maybe a medium-dark blue at the 50% dilution point for me. Not far off the Sea of Okinawa ink, somewhat darker.

    This experience did inspire me to pick up a Opus 88 Jazz so that I have one eyedropper pen as well, to mix things directly into the pen with a syringe. The TWSBI Eco I did the water-Nitrogen mix in was approximate, and I wasted ink to do the dilution, dipping the thing in water to suck some up, given that the ink was already in the pen.