If its a single image, I’d agree. If its a compose with multiple images though, better off combining into a single lxc or VM.

I got so annoyed when work tossed a system with that case. It was supposed to be set aside, but someone missed the memo.

Proxmox supports OCI containers natively now

As of 9.1, and kind of. To be clear what its doing is not a drop-in replacement for docker, but using that image as a basis for an lxc - so you’re not just pulling a new image to update, more like re-deploying, so keep your stored data elsewhere, outside of the lxc. So what was handled by pulling an image or a change to a compose is done manually in proxmox now, but it does make things like backups/snapshots much more consistent and proxmox-native.

DIY robovac time!

I wanna see full uprights, like the canister vacs mounted on an rc truck base.

If you waited long enough to get past the account duration requirement and it was open source, where people could evaluate and comment on what they see, yes.

If it were paid/closed source, then no, not without using that alt constantly to meet the requirements.

The point in the first place was the large influx in promo postings that were made, as well as create filterable tags for users who are or are not interested in seeing AIT or AIP. It also means for those who create an AI involved project, no matter the level, aren’t being bombarded with low effort, one word disparaging comments.

If you have another idea, or some way you believe a third person can have any realistic insight to provide a disclosure, you are welcome to create a meta discussion on it as there were for rules 7 & 8 already.

Its required for self promotion, there is no way for a third party to know the details to tag and disclose.

It would be like posting plex feature updates. There is no way for the poster to know whether or not any AI was used in development (though given the Plex trajectory, we all know, but thats a different matter).

“So say we all” - Captain Jack Sparrow, USS Enterprise G

Edit: Almost forgot, PTB.

I really dig his stamp…

Doing Things For You is not its best use.

Thats a bingo!

I find it a great tool for QA/QC (with RAG, without its… eh), managing tone in a document, finding potential security issues, etc.

But doing it all for you I have not found to be a useful experience.

Much appreciated!

I’ve had my own experiences with XLE, they behaved the same way to “defend” rimu. This is just another example of their behavior, but I don’t think it merits posting here personally, just reporting.

Please also add the disclosure, see expanded details for rule 8 and the examples post

Thanks!

One is pre-k and the other is elementary school aged, so I think even a yubikey is going to be too much 😄

But I’ve been thinking NFC because I have a bag full of tags I can use, I’d just need a reader there

I’m stuck with windows for my work laptop.

I’ll say it outright - metro was good but was delivered poorly. I liked full screen start as an option on my tablet, and it also worked great once you configured it well on the desktop. The problem, as I said, was delivery - it was only nice out of the box for touchscreens.

I kept full screen start on my desktop at 8.1 because it was such a great workflow (once I reworked the hell out of it to logical groups for all the esoteric manufacturers specific software I needed).

11 is just a shit show though. And teams. And shoving copilot into absolutely everything.

MS always does what you expect though - continues to make things worse to use. They’ve been doing it for decades now, they are great at it!

There used to be lore but they closed up shop almost a year ago iirc.

Thats my main point - Abrams was the wrong choice from the start imo.

Same comm, just scroll down a bit.

Scroll down, those are pinned.

Last post is from ~2hrs ago.

[email protected]