• 0 Posts
  • 314 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Aquileo | cake
Cake day: June 14th, 2025

Aquileo | help-circle



  • Lyrl@lemmy.dbzer0.comtoAtheism@lemmy.worldPronouns
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 days ago

    Like many languages, languages of the Bible like Hebrew and Greek have grammatical genders. The aspect of God that smites things is grammatically male. The aspect of God that conveys spiritual strength - usually translated as “the Holy Spirit” - is grammatically female. Progressive movements of Protestantism and Judaism see God as both genders: one of the two creation stories in Genesis states God created man AND woman in God’s image. The focus on the male aspect of God, and the second creation story in Genesis with the rib thing, is a conservative movement hang-up and not a general religion thing.


  • There was a reddit scandal last year where the mods of the ChangeMyMind sub agreed to let an AI lab research what arguments people on the sub found persuasive by writing fake responses. Claiming to be from an impacted group turned out to be a top persuasion factor.

    It’s not like it gets a majority of people. But if you can peel one percent off with one campaign, then those people’s connections can start to see that side of the argument as more human due to the in-person exposure, and the next campaign can peel off another one percent - it adds up over time.





  • And differences in average upper body strength between men and women are used to deny women work in jobs that involve lifting things. It can be done in a misogynist way like a blanket ban, or it can be done in a more knowledge-seeking way like requiring a physical therapist to evaluate lifting ability as part of the hiring process and only accepting candidates that can safely lift 50 pounds or whatever. There are structural incentives for the blanket ban in the form of the extra cost, time, and overhead management of the physical therapist evaluation program, but it has benefits of ruling out unusually unfit men who would likely get injured on the job as well as expanding the candidate pool to include unusually fit women.

    I don’t know what the equivalent to a professional evaluation of lifting ability would be to certify someone as SafeToDate.