

With this though I think there is legal stance because prohibitively high prices can be used as grounds to say that a product “can’t be repaired”. The legal precedent is there, you can’t just say “technically we give you the option, it’s just $2m”.


With this though I think there is legal stance because prohibitively high prices can be used as grounds to say that a product “can’t be repaired”. The legal precedent is there, you can’t just say “technically we give you the option, it’s just $2m”.
I do want to clarify as a Kentuckian, we do not want a dead man representing us. The republican party officials don’t want someone else. Most of Kentucky Dems and reps are getting pissed that he’s basically been pulling a “Weekend at Bernie’s” for 40+ days. It’s likely even with a special election that another Republican would still get elected. But people are still pissed this farce is happening


The problem is they’ve proven the phones don’t always matter. They definitely help, record every second of these assholes. But they have shown they have little issue gunning down someone in broad daylight, cameras or not.
But we need to get mad, protest, shut down the government and the city until they solve this problem. Citizens, Americans, are dying on our own soil with the slightest made up excuse. Fuck ICE.


I didn’t know they sized hoop earrings based on entitlement


It’s just how our brains are wired. If we cried like we lost a loved one every time we saw a death on the news we’d go insane.
We can still care and have empathy, but our brains are wired to at least have a small amount of stop gap distance between near and further social groups out of necessity. It doesn’t make you a bad person, but it should be something people account for when they think of anything around “we and they”


The problem a lot of times is that the social impact doesn’t get time to be addressed before it gets stopped in peoples minds. Many people get to “healthcare is expensive, I can’t/don’t want to pay someone else’s healthcare. Forget the economy or social benefit, I can’t afford to pay it.” So the benefits are there, but when people are struggling it’s hard to ask them to see beyond their nose.


Exactly. They know what they’re doing. Nobody thinks he’s some “spring chicken”. He’s old as dirt and he freezes in public all the time. If he didn’t look nearly dead then they’d do a 30 second video of him saying “hello everyone I’m getting better” but they aren’t. If he was really sitting in that chair with the paper and coherent then they’d let him be coherent.
No I’m not saying the AI did it of its own volition, we aren’t dealing with a Terminator scenario. I’m saying whatever instructions they gave it during testing they either 1. Didn’t expect it to get out or 2. Didn’t expect it to get caught either way, their actions resulted in a system with “a very particular set of skills” acting maliciously towards another uninvolved entity. Like a mutant science experiment breaking out and attacking.
I’m not saying the AI masterminded it’s way out to do the evil it wanted to do. I’m saying they made a very dangerous and capable tool and failed to maintain proper security and safety for it.


My go to was once it turned into troubleshooting I said “$55 an hour, that’s my rate”. If they said “why so expensive?” I’d follow up with “because I don’t want to do it.” Usually got a laugh and if they were actually willing to pay then they actually needed help, not just “why computer no computer gooder”
Probably made me look like an ass a few times, but I’m at the cookout, I don’t wanna work on your busted-ass Chromebook from 2013. I want to hang out, eat a burger, drink some beer, and not work.


Honestly it’s the fact that the paper was there that sells me for it. Like whoever took or doctored or made that photo was like “no we have to include the paper, nobody is going to believe us if we don’t” but if they really wanted us to believe them they’d make a statement. Which means that it wasn’t a good faith photo, they deliberately did their best to trick us by making it “as believable as we can”
The problem is these idiots aren’t treating this stuff like a weapon or hazardous material. They could’ve properly isolated it, heck you could physically isolate it if you really wanted (and they should have).
But it seems like they left a supervillain in a room with a locked door and a rocket launcher and said “now we are gonna close this door. You’re not allowed to leave” then got shocked when it broke out.
Then they went “oopsie, guess that rocket launcher had the safety off, sorry guys”


Forget painful boners, the first listed adverse “event” is cancer. I’m just gonna get my farmers tan naturally thank you


Mine was summer sausage I brought camping with me one time. Idk what happened to it but I was worshipping the porcelain god for a week.
The part that sucks is sometimes those 3% buffs compound with other stuff so it’s actually a 3000% buff but I can’t tell that because the devs don’t show where the boosts come from or how they’re calculated
just show me the math with a tooltip or something I shouldn’t have to reverse engineer the games systems just to decide where to spend one stupid skill point ffs


Linux is a system and a tool, Windows is a product. You don’t market high end precise machinery to everyday people, because it can be a pain. You sell them a product that is easy and simple.
Microsoft is trying to do both and failing at both horribly.


You have a point, and therefore rump is going to ignore it.


Why does “roadkill roleplay” somehow manage to sound worse than actually fucking roadkill…
I really think it’s a personal thing for your happiness right? You seem happy to carry her memory and knowing that’s exactly what matters to you. If others need someone around, or that you can share the future moments with, then you aren’t lying about it being “forever” if you continue living life, life changes lots of things. Sharing that love with someone is huge, but they also wanted to be with you for it. They can’t be, so if someone finds someone else and they want to walk through life together I’d like to think someone can find that.
Some are happy with the memory, and their values hold that they would never involve another. But others know that they needed each other to get through the good and the bad, and that person isn’t here anymore. They’ll never be the same as the person who is gone, but it doesn’t mean having them in your life is a “failure” or “betrayal”