• 12 Posts
  • 2.34K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Aquileo | cake
Cake day: January 12th, 2025

Aquileo | help-circle


  • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.workstoAsk Lemmy@lemmy.world*Permanently Deleted*
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    6
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    I don’t know, there is a certain nostalgia to it. Yes, it was a pain in the ass to use, but there was also the aspect where limitations breed creativity. If your time online is competing with one of the home’s primary means of communication, the landline phone, the internet becomes a limited resource. It wasn’t as easy to just rot on the internet as it is today. You had to be more deliberate with your time, even if that was just being more deliberate in the types of fun sites you were going to visit.












  • WoodScientist@sh.itjust.workstoPolitical Memes@lemmy.worldHere we go again...
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    10
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    2
    ·
    8 months ago

    Eh. It can be multiple things. The Second Iraq War was about oil, but it was also about W. having a personal grudge against Saddam. Saddam at one point tried to have Bush Sr. assassinated, and Jr. had it out for him as a consequence. Plus it was for political purposes, both to drum up the base at home and to assist Israel abroad. It was about all of those things. Wars are never caused by just a single reason. Oil was absolutely a powerful factor, perhaps the most powerful. But it’s overly reductive to simply say it was about oil. Launching a war requires getting a lot of stakeholders on board. And not everyone will have the same motivations. The Zionist faction wanted Iraq toppled to help Israel, but they have no particular concern for oil. The oil industry folks wanted Iraqi oil, but money-hungry CEOs don’t really care about throwing red meat to the Fox News crowd. Launching a big war requires a coalition, even if just the Republican coalition. Wars always thus have many motivations behind them.



  • I know that anybody who has consistent access to an internet connection in North Korea is almost certainly working for the benefit of the great leader and they aren’t actually seeing any money or benefit for themselves.

    Eh, this doesn’t sound like the job you would give someone in a prison camp. You’re talking about people that you’re allowing to interact and work regularly with foreigners outside the country. That does not sound like the type of position you trust to a political prisoner. That sounds like a position you put someone of high trust. It’s probably a pretty cushy job as the standards of North Korea go. Sure beats scratching at dirt or working in some godawful arms factory. It’s probably the type of job you need some good family connections in the Party in order to get. Sure, the government takes all the direct monetary benefit of the work, but that is just kindof how Communist systems work. I imagine the people working those jobs have some of the highest standards of living available to people that aren’t senior party leadership.