The rosewill 4u cases are cheap and fit eatx. I put some noctuas in mine, and it works great.

Noice. WWIII comin up hot.

Good comic.

Unlike Radiohead. Whiny zionist babies whose meandering melodies never go anywhere. Nerds.

You might appreciate

this is a website

“If my grandma had wheels, she’d be a bicycle!”

Somewhere Zenz is salivating.

Shit schedule if you don’t allow yourself time to “take a step back”.

Soo, then why did you characterize the solar power as being inadequate for propulsion? That is a meaningless thing to point out - given how the solar is not intended for propulsion. What was your original point?

Accusations of greenwashing are different than accusations of bad engineering. That’s a different conversation.

Except it does.

This power helps run the ship’s operations, lowering fuel use and making the ship more energy efficient.

This is textbook peak shaving. Not to mention the engineering feat of integrating solar with LNG for this cargo application.

Hopping into the comments to decry the ship for not doing full propulsion via solar just shows your ignorance. It’s like complaining about a hammer for not being able to screw in a fastener.

As is evidenced by their decision to go with dual fuel, the point of the solar was not to cover propulsion costs.

It is the necessary precondition to the “anyone with greater than x FLOPS in their own home is a terrorist” argument.

you chimed in to bullshit that it’s all the Dems faults

Do show me where this happened.

Nobody mentioned either party till you chimed

You did read the headline, right?

Why do y’all get so bruised when extremely valid critiques are leveled against the democrats?

blame democrats for everything republicans do

Uh, Joe Biden was not a republican. Neither was Obama. And it should be clear the Democrat senators are also not Republicans…

Lamo to be spouting constitutionalist hopium at this stage of the descent.

These [rights] are explicitly given by the Constitution and cannot be taken away.

Then explain how they took away Alex Pretti’s rights. Political power does not come from a Constitution; it comes from the barrel of a gun.

Also keep in mind your constitution is the only one I know of that explicitly enshrines the right to enslave people.

Joe Biden spent a record amount on ICE camps while the threat of fascism was obviously clear.

Obama not only discovered Homan, but awarded him with a medal when Homan devised a plan to separate migrant children from their parents at detention centers.

Every single dem senator voted to confirm Marco Rubio, who has obviously been one of the biggest champions of "immigration enforcement.

They’re not entirely wrong when they say the Democrats gave them a mandate.

I do agree that this is very rare take from climate activists. Those folks usually know their shit and are pretty radical.

However, this line of reasoning is definitely a thing among laypersons. It has historical precedent that has its roots in Malthusian population theory.

They’d respond sensitively. Is that supposed to be some sort of gotcha?

How do western AIs response to issues sensitive to the west compared to Chinese AIs?

Similarly, more sensitively. Which is what your own study posits. Your point about the whole of the Chinese open source strategy being a means to push propaganda came out of your analysis - not the study to which you linked.

It clearly reveals that Chinese ‘Open Source’ AI are just tools for Chinese Communist Party propaganda.

How do you figure? This is not the conclusion of this study. The study concludes with the fairly inoccuous point that a given country’s AI systems will oftentimes mirror that country’s values and government strategies. The word “propaganda” does not show up in the body of study a single time.

This study underscores a critical insight: AI chatbots are not neutral vessels of information. They are deeply embedded in political, cultural, and regulatory environments, and their outputs often reflect those influences. In China, for example, AI systems are explicitly tasked with reinforcing “core socialist values” and safeguarding state authority. This shapes not only what chatbots are permitted to say, but also how they transmit knowledge, define truth, and present information to align with state and societal ideologies.

For policymakers, the findings highlight the urgent need to integrate AI governance into broader debates around digital sovereignty, freedom of expression, and the integrity of public discourse. For developers, the research stresses the importance of transparency, context-aware design, and an awareness of how AI operates across jurisdictions and political systems. For users, understanding the potential for chatbot bias is now a key component of digital and AI literacy, recognizing that AI outputs are mediated, curated, and, at times, censored.

Before the conclusion, we see:

By contrast, Western chatbots like ChatGPT and Claude tend to reflect a wider range of perspectives, including international legal and human rights debates. This divergence illustrates how AI systems are deeply shaped by their geopolitical environments, reinforcing the notion that chatbot outputs are not neutral. Instead, they are embedded with ideological assumptions—raising broader implications for freedom of information, AI governance, and global epistemic plurality.

Anyone can run an experiment when the lead the question to AI. lmao at how chatgpt characterizes the Native American genocide versus DeepSeek.

Wise words. Thanks.