Someone (average smartphone user) complained to me the other day that there isn’t a clear solution to navigating the web because it’s either ai slop or the results are poor.

And I kinda agree, nowadays you do have to put in some more effort to get what you’re looking for.

And so I told them I’d compile a list of which search engines are best for what purpose.

So far I have:

Startpage: works, but does a poor job of finding product codes and whatnot.

Duckduckgo: gives more general results afaik

Ecosia: works great but relies on bing

I have tried things like qwant ect but haven’t really settled on those.

Any other suggestions?

I’d tell em to use udm14 but it’s still google so I’d rather keep that as a plan B.

  • kuneho@lemmy.world
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 days ago

    I use duckduckgo for every of my web searching needs. 85% of the times I get relevant or somewhat relevant results. The rest… well, I acknowledge that I may search for super nieche things and move on.

    Only thing I don’t kinda like in duckduckgo though is that the result list may change if I navigate to somewhere and go back, but I can live with it.

  • FoundFootFootage78@lemmy.ml
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    8
    ·
    Aquileo | edit-2
    2 days ago

    Ultimately duckduckgo is the best.

    Bing and Google are out for obvious reasons. Startpage kept asking me to prove I’m human. Qwant blocked me whenever I enabled a VPN with an exit in a region they couldn’t run ads to. Ecosia is a non-profit so I’d feel bad blocking ads, but I don’t want to see ads. Mojeek returned garbage results. Kagi is ridiculously overpriced and restrictive. Brave Search often didn’t return the results I was looking for. And SearXNG I don’t remember what the problem was.

    • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      10
      Aquileo | arrow-down
      3
      ·
      Aquileo | edit-2
      2 days ago

      and you can downrank/ban websites.

      Holy shit, I’ve been wanting that for years. I’ll have to check them out.

      Edit: Aaaand they have a built in AI despite calling themselves “human-focussed”. That’s a turnoff. If I’m paying for a search engine, I’d prefer to have a subscription option with the AI stripped out so I’m not subsidizing it for others.

      Plus, I’m thinking about it I’m not exactly on board with needing an account with a search engine. That makes it super easy to track you. Meanwhile, using noai.duckduckgo anonymously via a VPN is way more private

  • stellargmite@lemmy.world
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    32
    ·
    3 days ago

    Kagi. Not cheap but I seriously cant go back. Its really good for what I need - actual results at the top of the first page, based purely on what I searched for. What a concept. My needs are basic to be clear.

  • SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    9
    ·
    Aquileo | edit-2
    2 days ago

    Well, at risk of downvotes…

    I know what your asking but tbh I generally don’t search, at least not like we used to. It’s weird to say that, like I’m making some claim to heightened purity or some bullshit but it’s not that at all. Search is just … noisy AF these days.

    I actually find myself using fewer sources, more directly and own my terms.

    Eg: For something like PubMed, I go to pubmed (or define a proper boolean PICO search in an indexing tool). Sci-hub is a good source too.

    https://sci-hub.st/

    Or I can hit the wikipedia API (or even better, self hosted kiwix) and find what I need.

    https://kiwix.org/en/

    Or, for known, commonly visited sites (like fan wikis), I use self-written tools.

    There are plenty of sites have public facing, nicely formatted, JSON friendly results. Others are just clean to scrape. A recent discovery was Muvitimes (for getting movie times listings).

    https://muvitimes.com/

    These tools query my white listed sites to a particular depth, collect the results I need, and present them for review.

    You can then cache the info locally to query against using something like Meilisearch.

    https://github.com/meilisearch/meilisearch

    There are other options too. Something like Scrapy can collect structured data and a Trafilatura-like extractor can remove menus, adverts, and repeated page content.

    https://github.com/scrapy/scrapy

    I’ve even use something like self hosted Perplexica. It can query SearXNG, Tavily, Exa or other sources.

    https://github.com/kiranz/perplexica

    Honestly, if it’s a quick throw away search, I’ll call my self hosted llm, get it to pull from Tavilly and give me the summary and citations. That’s been miles better than most other options for me but YMMV.

    Finally, if you’re talking about random occasional searches on phone, when I can’t access my LAN, I don’t mind DDG-lite

    https://lite.duckduckgo.com/lite

  • Alavi@programming.dev
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m a software engineer so I search quite a lot.

    99% of my search is on duckduckgo and it provides me the best answers. Even if I’m using someone else’s device to show them something for example, and their default search engine is google, I will switch to ddg because it genuinely provides better answers.