• oneser
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    32
    ·
    9 days ago

    Does anyone comprehensively understand the effect of confirming them as “lawful technical tools” in case of further challenges to VPNs?

    • Sibbo@sopuli.xyz
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      23
      ·
      9 days ago

      No idea, but it sounds like you are allowed to use them. But most likely not to do anything illegal, such as violating any license agreements. So any streaming service can forbid using a VPN to change location and bypass region-blocking. But again, no idea.

      • Natanael@slrpnk.net
        Aquileo | link
        Aquileo | fedilink
        English
        Aquileo | arrow-up
        13
        ·
        9 days ago

        This was mostly a ruling about the responsibility for websites (don’t have to block VPNs to enforce regional restrictions of content, etc) and VPN providers (not responsible for users circumventing regional restrictions). Websites can still choose to try to block, of course. Users can still be liable as usual if they use it to break the law but private companies are generally not responsible for enforcing that others follow the law, they’re responsible just for their own actions.

      • rollin@piefed.social
        Aquileo | link
        Aquileo | fedilink
        English
        Aquileo | arrow-up
        7
        Aquileo | arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        They could ban VPNs being sold commercially. That would be enough to stop 90% of the people who currently use VPNs to evade lawful regulations on harmless activities.