• 0 Posts
  • 72 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
Aquileo | cake
Cake day: July 15th, 2023

Aquileo | help-circle












  • If this is meant to be an example of the superior writing quality that’s possible with AI assistance, I’m not seeing it. This whole post is difficult to read:

    • It adds paragraph breaks after single sentences, sometimes mid sentence.
    • Some appear to be meant as headings, but there’s no clear organization going on.
    • It expounds over and over about letting the AI do the “heavy lifting” and “final polishing” without ever giving examples of how it helped or what the original input was.
    • It awkwardly jumps to second person several times, which makes me wonder if these were part of the author’s “collaboration” with the AI that got left in by mistake.
    • Despite the many words spilled, it never gets around to having a point beyond: save time, make more articles faster

    All of these things are hallmarks of slop. It makes me think the author is doing such a shoddy job reviewing it that they didn’t actually care about the quality of the work. And if that’s the case, then why should I bother reading it?



  • blipcasttoNo Stupid QuestionsWhat's the deal with people liking old devices?
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    1
    ·
    Aquileo | edit-2
    4 months ago

    I’m not super into retro tech, but It’s become clear how advancements in technology aren’t strictly positive. The things that get taken away aren’t obvious and they aren’t advertised. Things like ad-free interfaces, fewer privacy concerns, faster loading times because it isn’t running dozens of background requests, less UI friction from popups, modals, and elements shifting on the page, no barrages of notifications, no perverse incentives where the user is the product.

    Retro tech isn’t immune to any of those things, but it is refreshing when you return to one of these devices and discover it has features you didn’t realize had been taken from you.