• 3 Posts
  • 1.16K Comments
Joined 1 year ago
Aquileo | cake
Cake day: July 29th, 2025

Aquileo | help-circle

  • If she’s going to throw transgender people under the bus, she will also do nothing to protect immigrants, or people of color, or parents, or the elderly, or animals, or the climate, or the environment, etc.

    Politics is not two-dimensional. Don’t get me wrong, she’s acting like a piece of utter shit in her treatment of trans people. But to assume all of her other beliefs because of that one is a fallacy. Would I rather the people of Ohio have a viable progressive candidate? 100%. But they don’t, because

    The more I think on it, the only move that plays to win is putting in the effort to organize around a grassroots progressive as a write-in.

    In a first-past-the-post system, all this move does is guarantee that the more conservative major candidate wins. This is called the spoiler effect. By removing support from the major candidate who is more aligned with your views, you are voting against your own interests, because it effectively improves the position of the major candidate who is less aligned with your views. There is not a vote total a candidate needs to win, they just need more votes than the other candidates.

    I absolutely despise our voting system, but despising it doesn’t mean it goes away. Until we move to a ranked choice system or something similar, it is practically always a losing move to abandon the lesser of two evils. In our shitty system, Vote aggressively for progressive candidates in primaries, and then vote defensively for the least regressive major candidate in the general. Until we do that, or until we get rid of our godawful system, the Republicans will keep winning. Because they understand this. You may have heard the phrase, “Democrats fall in love, Republicans fall in line.”


  • TheRealKuni@piefed.socialtoMicroblog Memes*Permanently Deleted*
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    21
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    TV rules are weird in the US. This is going to be simplified, but essentially it’s accurate as I understand it. Because of the first amendment guarantees of freedom of speech and freedom of the press, the government can’t actually tell you what you can and can’t say.

    Except in the case of broadcast television. Because the way the law works, the right to use those radio signals is owned by the government and granted to companies. So the FCC gets to decide what you can and cannot say on a broadcast television channel.

    Fox News is not a broadcast channel, it is a cable channel. So the government doesn’t get to tell them shit and they can get away with whatever they want.






  • He completed med school, but never did a residency or worked as a physician.

    Correct me if I’m wrong, but isn’t someone who graduated from medical school a doctor? You just can’t practice without supervision until you go through residency, right? But like, someone on their first day of residency is still a “doctor,” not a “student doctor.”

    If rather than becoming licensed to practice medicine unsupervised he continued his schooling to become an epidemiologist, it doesn’t mean he isn’t an MD or DO (whichever he received from medical school), right?

    Edit: Ah, the hangup is over the word “physician.” That’s…okay that seems silly to me but I guess I generally do hear that word in the context of “licensed physician.” So I can understand objecting to its use for someone who is not licensed.