they don’t just wrap locations in brackets, they wrap every single link in brackets so the software knows to make it a link. wikipedia’s big shtick is making articles have tons of link to each other so that is not easy to figure out which one is the location

not to mention examples like Terminator 1:

Filming for ‘‘The Terminator’’ was set to begin in early 1983 in [[Toronto]], but was halted when producer [[Dino De Laurentiis]] applied an option in Schwarzenegger’s contract that would make him unavailable

when they started filming, the set was moved to Los Angeles. following a link in that section to Rambo 2:

The film was shot between June and August 1984 [[Location shooting|on location]] in the state of [[Guerrero]], Mexico, and [[Thailand]].

clearly, the movie wasn’t shot in “Location shooting”, and we can’t just discard Thailand when placing all of the films dots on a map. similarly, Get Out begins with “[[Principal photography]] began on February 16, 2016.”

I don’t think that’s true. Bootup and suspending don’t need stopping things like that.

Source: I use systemd btw

wikidata is much easier to query while querying natural language is hard

I think the argument is more “we shouldn’t develop them further to avoid any problems that may come with effectively consciousness” (wink wink at rogue behavior) (not “we should sanctify the LLM”), but you have a point.

this is a very suspicious source that seems AI-generated

It’s Not Laziness—It’s Economics

[prediction markets ticker at top]

that’s not it. the article features that they’re most commonly writing moral compasses for LLMs to follow, not us, that’s the opposite. so i agree that all those ethical concerns seem to be ignored but at least they’re not telling us what to do.

I see ze took notes from archive.today (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archive.today#Attack_on_Gyrovague_and_Wikipedia’s_restrictions )

well, it’s a fork of Photon, which was always working

I’m pretty sure ze’s (accurately) talking about how many of the enacted age verification régimes only mandate it for platforms with certain amounts of monthly active users.

your comment would be received a lot better if it said “Does this apply to pictures exposing torture or genocide?”. you’re very confidently claiming it does this thing, and so you got downvoted because it’s not true.

that iirc lasted just some dozen minutes after initially being listed. that day it closed at $160. it’s the closing price that matters

and even if we compare against that, that’s just <42% off.

70% off

doesn’t seem to be true? lowest recently was 132.15 which is less than 23% off the peak of 170.86. and that wasn’t even a closing price; by the day’s end it was back above 135 and the stock has never closed below 135.

Link: “Like guarantees of future returns, this page doesn’t exist.”

this article sounds like AI too, i am going crazy

well, why is it we shouldn’t disrespect? don’t get me wrong, i agree that we should respect, but many customs of respect like this one seem to have origins nearly as arbitrary as faith

is it true that anyone rich enough to eat deer meat need it, or any kind of meat at that, to survive?

the military already covered care for testosterone deficiency as part of its free healthcare

it was also an opportunity for everyone to kumbayah and get some good press on addressing affordability

(the colors are whether and how much the stock rose, not credit rating)

yahoo news is not a news source but a site that republishes articles from other websites. you can tell from the top here that this is the exactly same article from Gadget Review

apparently the 404media part is just a part of the article where it cites previous incidents. so then we don’t even have a source for the meat of the article save a random X thread.