Some_Emo_Chick to TechnologyEnglish · 1 month agoAnybody Who Thinks Orbital Data Centers are a Good Idea Is Suffering from AI Psychosis, Experts Arguetech.yahoo.comAquileo | external-linkAquileo | message-square403Aquileo | linkAquileo | fedilinkAquileo | arrow-up11.11KAquileo | arrow-down120cross-posted to: fuck_ai
Aquileo | arrow-up11.09KAquileo | arrow-down1Aquileo | external-linkAnybody Who Thinks Orbital Data Centers are a Good Idea Is Suffering from AI Psychosis, Experts Arguetech.yahoo.comSome_Emo_Chick to TechnologyEnglish · 1 month agoAquileo | message-square403Aquileo | linkAquileo | fedilinkcross-posted to: fuck_ai
Aquileo | minus-squareGoatSynagogueAquileo | linkAquileo | fedilinkEnglishAquileo | arrow-up1Aquileo | arrow-down3·1 month agoIt all comes down to $/kg of payload. There’s infinite space up there.
Aquileo | minus-squareSGforce@lemmy.caAquileo | linkAquileo | fedilinkEnglishAquileo | arrow-up3Aquileo | arrow-down1·1 month agoHow is this a rational argument? With infinite money we could put the Empire State building on Venus but it would be really fucking stupid.
Aquileo | minus-squareGoatSynagogueAquileo | linkAquileo | fedilinkEnglishAquileo | arrow-up1·1 month agoIt’s rational because the payload cost is coming down and down and down with SpaceX. Reusable rockets was a massive step. Once it’s affordable, why wouldn’t they do it?
It all comes down to $/kg of payload. There’s infinite space up there.
How is this a rational argument? With infinite money we could put the Empire State building on Venus but it would be really fucking stupid.
It’s rational because the payload cost is coming down and down and down with SpaceX. Reusable rockets was a massive step.
Once it’s affordable, why wouldn’t they do it?