cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/46148690

Over the past few days, @[email protected]/@[email protected] has banned multiple users, blocked entire comms, and now defederated from Anarchist.Nexus over their anti-Zionist stance.

This extreme overreaction and general power trippin’ bastard behavior stems from Lemmy.world’s history of pro-Zionist views. And now MrKaplan is seeking out the flimsiest pretext to to enact his own personal vendetta.

Free Palestine, Death to Israel, Death to Zionism.

Lemmy.world is a ZioNazi instance. Avoid it like the plague.

  • Salamence@mander.xyz
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    49
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 months ago

    Hilarious, i wonder if Dbzero will defederate too since they have the flotilla thing with anarchistnexus

    Axis.world becoming fascist instance was going to happen eventually, they will probably call the flotilla instances tankie extremists to try to save face

        • TropicalDingdong
          Aquileo | link
          Aquileo | fedilink
          Aquileo | arrow-up
          11
          ·
          3 months ago

          Let’s not forget the roles lund and squid played in turning wirld news and political memes into their personal safe spaces and echo chambers.

            • TropicalDingdong
              Aquileo | link
              Aquileo | fedilink
              Aquileo | arrow-up
              10
              ·
              3 months ago

              Squid operated as both super poster, super commentor, super mod, and super confused around Zionism and Israel because they took everything critical of Israel as an antisemitism. They modded many of the major communities and created some of the strongest echo chambers which are still in place (world news and politicalmemes are some of the worst) where a very strict but unspoken orthodoxy is maintained.

              Really I just highlight them as yet another power tripping mod., and that as an issue, mod power and the ability to implement a form of censorship, even if implicit, through moderation, is substantial. World news and politicalmemes are basically broken subs because of moderation abuse, and squid was a primary contributed of the abuse.

              Lund on the other hand, for all the shit they get, I actually think is very fair in their application of the rules. The only issue I have is that the rules they insist on are outdated and stupid. Not being able to post video content or sites like dropsite or zeteo; it’s buffoonish. They treat news media as if it’s 2004 and nothing has changed in media since then. I agree with their arguments about reliability and editorial boards, but litterally, so many independent media have editorial boards and standards (they issue retractions et…). And not allowing video content? I mean come on grandpa…

      • NotFrenchJack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        Aquileo | link
        Aquileo | fedilink
        Aquileo | arrow-up
        8
        Aquileo | arrow-down
        11
        ·
        3 months ago

        They are neoliberal DNC types.

        Calling everything “Nazi” is lazy and whitewashes a big chuck of zio-aligned mainstream politics that doesn’t explicitly identify as righter-than-center-right.

          • NotFrenchJack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            Aquileo | link
            Aquileo | fedilink
            Aquileo | arrow-up
            5
            Aquileo | arrow-down
            5
            ·
            Aquileo | edit-2
            3 months ago

            “Nazi” is not a generic synonym for “bad person” or “mass murderer” or “genocider”. I know it’s common place, but this is the laziness I’m talking about. If we start using every word by its generic connotations or goodness/badness, then these words will no longer serve as a distinctive epistemological tool.

            And there is actually a historical irony here, in the context of doing this with Zionism. The soviet union and its bolsheviks actually supported the Zionist entity in its first decade of existence, and actively so. Massacres against villagers and other events from that era didn’t cause any deterrence to that support. They even went as far as making Arab communists work as what would effectively be described today as Mossad agents. This alignment only started to shift circa ~1958.

            Should we call the soviets from that era “Nazis”?

            If we want to principally oppose Zionism, and we should be, then we need to be educated, informed, and diligent against falling for traps like those from the mainstream right-left political theater.

            • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
              Aquileo | link
              Aquileo | fedilink
              Aquileo | arrow-up
              4
              Aquileo | arrow-down
              2
              ·
              3 months ago

              Those who conduct or support the genocide of a ‘lesser’ people are nazis.

              I think that’s a good enough approximation. And the current nazis are very much conducting the genocide of the native people. I said nothing about “bad person” or “mass murderer”.

              Should we call the soviets from that era “Nazis”?

              I think we should definitely criticise the Soviet support for all sorts of nationalisms in general, and this nationalism in particular. Yes the Russian Empire was cruel towards (most) minorities, but that doesn’t mean you need to create political entities that do not have the population or economy to support themselves. Cultural freedom might have been a better aim.

              However, the wish for a ‘Jewish’ state is still understandable, if it recognises an equal Palestinian state. The Israel of the 1950s was still problematic, but a far better country than the Israel of today.

              • NotFrenchJack@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                Aquileo | link
                Aquileo | fedilink
                Aquileo | arrow-up
                2
                Aquileo | arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                And the mask is off.

                Massacres in 2024 are abhorrent and a very big deal. Massacres in 1948 were unfortunate, preferably not mentioned at all.
                Population displacement is abhorrent and criminal in 2024. But it was “understandable” in 1948.
                Colonialism in 1948 was okay whenever it had good enough red paint!

                Many of you are not against Zionism. You are specifically against the Jabotinskyists leading the Zionist entity’s scene today. And the opposition itself is not that genuine. It’s just a part of the moral posturing arsenal for scoring points in the right-left political theater.

                • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
                  Aquileo | link
                  Aquileo | fedilink
                  Aquileo | arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  Sorry, how did you go from ‘the wish for a Jewish state is understandable’ to ‘massacres and population displacement are unfortunate / okay’? Colonialism is never okay. But there are levels of evil. The Israel project was misguided from the beginning, but it could have been justified in the immediate aftermath of the holocaust. Now? Not only are Israel’s actions openly genocidal, there’s no reasonable justification for attacking every country in the region.

                  You are specifically against the Jabotinskyists leading the Zionist entity’s scene today.

                  I don’t know about this. Has there been a change in Israeli leadership? I thought the change in policy was due to US influence.

    • captcha_incorrect
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      8
      Aquileo | arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 months ago

      Mostly not. I never see any of it, but I have taken to block any and all US politics (but even before that, it was seldom). It is there if you want to find it and feel like having pointless arguments with people.

  • mrdown
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    14
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    A zionist scum who is not currently loving in palestinian land and not involved in murder do not deserve to die . The guy advocating for killing all zionists deserve it, the other guy using the terms zionazis and shitlib do not

  • Wild_Mastic
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    12
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    I have no idea what’s going on here, should I move my account to another instance? For reference, I mainly use lemmy for fun and not for politics or drama like this. Also, created this account years ago when there were fewer instances.

    • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.ml
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      13
      Aquileo | arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      The answer as always is do what you want. It’s the fediverse, you’re not tied to one account on one instance. If you’re looking for the instances with the least defederation lemmy.zip is a good bet. I’m very happy on lemmy.ml and lemmy.blahaj.zone for wider federation and hexbear.net for the instance culture

  • Limonene
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    13
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    10
    ·
    3 months ago

    Who is “FHF”? If the reasons stated in the modlog are true, these seem justified.

    I’ve had a consistent antizionist stance and never got banned from lemmy.world. You can’t advocate murdering zionists who aren’t actively involved in murder themselves.

  • FauxLiving
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    26
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    30
    ·
    3 months ago

    Banning a guy literally calling for murder in his username is very much YDM.

    Using dumbass terms like ‘zionazis and shitlibs’ (learn to articulate your point instead of repeating dumbass memes) and posting swastikas is BPR.

    • mrdown
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      13
      Aquileo | arrow-down
      9
      ·
      3 months ago

      Zionists are using the same methods and rhetoric as the nazi. Shitlib refer to the part of liberals who refuse to critisize it side. Both terms are very valid to use

      • FauxLiving
        Aquileo | link
        Aquileo | fedilink
        Aquileo | arrow-up
        12
        Aquileo | arrow-down
        11
        ·
        3 months ago

        I know what they mean.

        You should also know that those terms are so overused as insults that they effectively don’t have a definition other than:

        Shitlib/Zionist - adj. ‘a person who possibly takes a different position as me, idk I’m too lazy to actually understand them but I want validation from the Internet and these words get me upvotes’

        • mrdown
          Aquileo | link
          Aquileo | fedilink
          Aquileo | arrow-up
          9
          Aquileo | arrow-down
          10
          ·
          3 months ago

          No. They are insults to terrible people justifying the unjustifiable and has very concrete definitions

          • FauxLiving
            Aquileo | link
            Aquileo | fedilink
            Aquileo | arrow-up
            10
            Aquileo | arrow-down
            6
            ·
            3 months ago

            What they mean and how they are commonly used on social media are two different things.

            Someone called me a zionist in this thread. It wasn’t based on any kind of reality as I never stated any opinion in any comment here about Israel and my comment history is certainly anti-zionist. They were not saying it because it is definitionally true, because it isn’t.

            They called me that because they perceived me as being on a different ‘side’ than them and know that using that term as an insult in a space like this is guaranteed to put them on the right side of the dogpile.

            They were not using the term as it is defined, i.e. a supporter of zionism. They were using it as an insult to attack me, i.e. ‘hey this person is bad, get them!’.

            • mrdown
              Aquileo | link
              Aquileo | fedilink
              Aquileo | arrow-up
              9
              Aquileo | arrow-down
              5
              ·
              3 months ago

              Someone called me a zionist in this thread. It wasn’t based on any kind of reality as I never stated any opinion in any comment here about Israel and my comment history is certainly anti-zionist. They were not saying it because it is definitionally true, because it isn’t.

              Let see. Do you believe that the way Israel was created was illegitimate ? Do you agree that Israel alone is the only responsible for Palestinians being occupied for 78 years? Do you agree that Palestinians has the right to armed resistance?

      • Limonene
        Aquileo | link
        Aquileo | fedilink
        Aquileo | arrow-up
        7
        Aquileo | arrow-down
        9
        ·
        3 months ago

        Most zionists are not settlers. To be clear, killing settlers can be justified as defensive, so nobody should be banned for a name like “Kill All Zionist Settlers”. But there are like 800k settlers, and hundreds of millions of zionists. You can’t ethically kill someone just for having an opinion, even a reprehensible opinion, if they don’t even act on it.

        • Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml
          Aquileo | link
          Aquileo | fedilink
          Aquileo | arrow-up
          11
          Aquileo | arrow-down
          9
          ·
          3 months ago

          Most zionists are not settlers

          This is a lie

          You can’t ethically kill someone just for having an opinion, even a reprehensible opinion, if they don’t even act on it

          Also a lie, also supporting a genocidal ethnostate in any way is acting on it

    • Godric
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      4
      Aquileo | arrow-down
      5
      ·
      3 months ago

      No, you misunderstand, it was calling for the murder of The Bad Guys.

      Also, if you disagree with me, you love genocide and are A Bad Guy.

      • FauxLiving
        Aquileo | link
        Aquileo | fedilink
        Aquileo | arrow-up
        6
        Aquileo | arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Disagreeing with murder means supporting genocide.

        Therefore I support murder-free genocide!

        Wait…

      • Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml
        Aquileo | link
        Aquileo | fedilink
        Aquileo | arrow-up
        3
        Aquileo | arrow-down
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        Killing evil people is good, fucking duh, the only people pretending otherwise are either incurable morons or also evil, if not both

        • Godric
          Aquileo | link
          Aquileo | fedilink
          Aquileo | arrow-up
          2
          Aquileo | arrow-down
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          Yeah! Killing The Bad Guys is good, everyone who disagrees is a moron or a Bad Guy in disguise, or both! You get it!

          • Amnesigenic@lemmy.ml
            Aquileo | link
            Aquileo | fedilink
            Aquileo | arrow-up
            2
            Aquileo | arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 months ago

            It’s actually really easy to be on the right side of this, if you fail to do so people are going to assume some negative things about you and they’re entirely correct in doing so

            • Godric
              Aquileo | link
              Aquileo | fedilink
              Aquileo | arrow-up
              2
              Aquileo | arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Glad we understand eachother’s views. It’s very, very easy to be on the right side of an issue when that issue is the mass-murder of people that are “The Bad Guys”.