• Karjalan
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    I feel like the sample size is too low though. I wouldn’t argue that it’s more safe… But a lot of the deaths in space travel were in the early days when we were still figuring shit out and had less sophisticated technology for things like automatic abort systems etc.

    • dehyzer@piefed.social
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      For a more recent data point, how about NASA’s safety requirements for SpaceX manned flights, circa 2020?

      Josh Finch, a NASA spokesperson, told Spaceflight Now that the agency’s calculated “Loss Of Crew” probability for SpaceX’s Demo-2 test flight is 1-in-276, exceeding the commercial crew program’s requirement threshold of 1-in-270.

      Would you get in a car if you had a 1 in 270 chance of dying during each trip? Those aren’t great odds for surviving a year’s worth of daily commutes.

      https://spaceflightnow.com/2020/05/22/nasa-review-clears-spacex-crew-capsule-for-first-astronaut-mission/

        • dehyzer@piefed.social
          Aquileo | link
          Aquileo | fedilink
          English
          Aquileo | arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          For the sake of argument, let’s use your numbers and say an average astronaut ends up taking a dozen flights on rockets designed to NASA’s 1-in-270 “loss of crew” standard. If that probability holds, then we would expect 4.4% of all astronauts flying in modern rockets to be in a fatal accident during their 12-mission career.

          For comparison, lifetime driving fatality risk for American drivers is right around 1%.