• nogooduser
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    4
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 years ago

    Because that’s not how it works. It would be great if that was how it worked for all billionaires but it isn’t.

    Taxing 66% of the winnings of someone who was previously not wealthy is unreasonable if you don’t also tax other rich people at the same rate.

    • 4ce@lemm.ee
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      2
      Aquileo | arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 years ago

      Yeah, obviously that should go for everyone. I realize it’s currently not very realistic in most countries, but I maintain that it would be reasonable. It’s also not without precedent, even the extremely capitalist US had top income taxes of above 90% from the mid-40s to the early 60s.

      Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Historical_Income_Tax_Rates_and_brackets.png