We have /c/fuckcars but no /c/fuckplanes. Yet a lot of the same arguments apply. They cause air pollution (roughly double the amount per km traveled), noise pollution and they (airports) take up a lot of space near dense living areas. Sure, some places can practically only be visited by plane, just like some places can practically only be visited by car. But people don’t consider not having your holiday that far away or giving pushback on a busines trip that should have been an online meeting. Besides work-from-home being encouraged, work-from-home-country should be too.

Cars need to be discouraged in favor of busses, trams and trains. Planes nees to be discouraged in favor of high-speed trains, staycations and hopefully new alternatives like modern sailboats or electric planes.

  • virku
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    33
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    If people stop commuting by plane to do a meeting I think the bulk of airplane travel would stop.

    At least the morning and afternoon planes are usually full of people in suits where I live.

    • Dewe
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      How have you gathered apparently representative data on morning and afternoon flights? Do you work at an airport or airline?