• stermy4uBanned from communityOP
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    170
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 days ago

    First round of insider shareholders haven’t legally been allowed to even liquidate yet. This will be a bloodbath.

    • nialv7
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      15
      Aquileo | arrow-down
      1
      ·
      14 days ago

      do we know when that’s gonna happen? i heard they used some loopholes to allow insider holders to sell early.

      • 🌸𝓯𝓵𝓸𝔀𝓮𝓻🌸@sh.itjust.works
        Aquileo | link
        Aquileo | fedilink
        English
        Aquileo | arrow-up
        33
        ·
        14 days ago

        It’s more a question what’ll happen to the other AI companies. Investors have now seen the first of the big ones tank. They’ll wonder if the same will happen with OpenAI, Antrophic and other AI adjacent like Microsoft, Nvidia. For a bunch of companies living of venture capital, that’s deadly.

            • Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
              Aquileo | link
              Aquileo | fedilink
              English
              Aquileo | arrow-up
              20
              Aquileo | arrow-down
              1
              ·
              14 days ago

              Which just goes to show you how bullshit the profit margins are on space travel when they gotta turn the business into a chat bot to be “profitable”

              • locahosr443
                Aquileo | link
                Aquileo | fedilink
                English
                Aquileo | arrow-up
                4
                ·
                13 days ago

                It had nothing to do with profit and everything to do with the tens of billions in debt that was coming due. The merger then ipo was just to dump that bill on the public.

                It’s even questionable to me if some of the space x investors will be able to get out above water… Some of those shares were sold at insanely high values then diluted. Fuck them all of course, but seems likely all this ipo achieves is another year or so of runway for the ponzi

              • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                Aquileo | link
                Aquileo | fedilink
                English
                Aquileo | arrow-up
                2
                ·
                13 days ago

                I disagree. That part is actually a somewhat reasonable business (though partially held up by public funds through contracts). The issue isn’t what part is profitable. The issue is what part is getting all the investment and speculation. SpaceX was probably still overvalued for a space company, but they were doing something with measurable tangible value. The AI side is pure promise, and it’s only speculation, and the speculation is wild. It’s valued higher than something that’s actually making profit.

                • Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
                  Aquileo | link
                  Aquileo | fedilink
                  English
                  Aquileo | arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  I get what you’re getting at, but I’d argue that we should look holistically at spacex. If their business model is launching a bazillion satellites and making a bazillion dollars we have to look at the entire launch complex as operating capital of starlink and spaceai. It all depends on starship launching a bazillion times a day so we should include development costs of starship as costs of starlink. The need for these businesses are necessary because the boom in private bookings of rocket launches that was anticipated with cheap launch services hasn’t materialized and so they have an airport and planes without passengers.

                  I ain’t no rocket economist but it seems “all the money” that starlink makes arent enough.

                • Cethin@lemmy.zip
                  Aquileo | link
                  Aquileo | fedilink
                  English
                  Aquileo | arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  13 days ago

                  As much as I hate them, losing money is not the same as having negative value. Yeah, the current number is total bullshit, but they do have a value that’s greater than 0. Information control has a value, and that’s what they provide.