• Maggoty
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 years ago

    The point is you can reduce anything to its origin. That does not mean it’s still the same thing.

    • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      1
      Aquileo | arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 years ago

      The point is you can reduce anything to its origin.

      Okay, but how does the modern version of cathartic theory differ from what freud postulated?

      I agree you can’t reduce things based on its original alone , which is why I included a scientific source as evidence…

      • Maggoty
        Aquileo | link
        Aquileo | fedilink
        English
        Aquileo | arrow-up
        1
        Aquileo | arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 years ago

        I don’t know, that’s why I have a therapist, I’m not educated in psychology. But I do recognize a logical fallacy when I see one.

        • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
          Aquileo | link
          Aquileo | fedilink
          English
          Aquileo | arrow-up
          1
          Aquileo | arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 years ago

          But I do recognize a logical fallacy when I see one.

          I doubt that, so far your argument has been based on the anecdotal fallacy mixed with a bit of the appeal to authority fallacy.

          • Maggoty
            Aquileo | link
            Aquileo | fedilink
            English
            Aquileo | arrow-up
            1
            Aquileo | arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            Lmao. Says the guy who tried to use a study on aggression to address sexual urges.

            • TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee
              Aquileo | link
              Aquileo | fedilink
              English
              Aquileo | arrow-up
              1
              Aquileo | arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 years ago

              Reading comprehension is still hard for you? My argument was about Cathartic theory, which includes several emotions including sexual urges… It is a theory from freud, of course it covers sexual urges.

              You and the other guy just have no idea what you’re talking about. How about providing any kind of source instead of talking out of your ass?