Yeah, the students that engage and rate the lectures, tutorials, etc aren’t cramming “everything” at 2am before exams and generally fare better in 2nd/3rd year when these strategies get less viable.

Anecdotally, they’re also less likely to get into embarrassing arguments with a lecturer who holds a PhD, because they’ve asked for the 15th time if a particular topic is going to be on the exam and pissed them off.

Pretty sure this account is just a repost bot that just posts slop.

Cheers for the comprehensive recommendations, I’ll check them out!

I was always a fan of Ray Ban and got their glasses/sunglasses. Guess I need to look elsewhere since this god awful partnership.

Honestly would just go hands off and tell the provider there’s water involved. They’ll likely need to repair and dig it up anyway.

About the name: “oomwoo” is a rotational ambigram — it reads the same flipped 180°, just like the robot itself roaming your floor in every direction.

State it clearly. None of your post have any flair and I checked on two separate clients.

Telling you that people won’t engage with lazy slop posting isn’t “policing” you, it’s telling you the reality of a situation you’re trying to lie to yourself is censorship. No one owes you engagement or a platform. Spellcheckers are entirely different to LLM. Only a slop poster would confuse or try to deliberately conflate the two.

Sure do so, myself and a good portion of communities who view this level of use/laziness similarly will keep doing what’s been happening to that content thus far. Just don’t come whinging about it or trying to kid yourself it’s “censorship” when you get banned.

You post AI coded stuff asking people to test it to see if it’s “worth investing time in”, you don’t even type the text for those post. It’s not even a witch hunt, it’s blatantly obvious. No one wants to engage with someone who doesn’t appear to bother even typing out their own post. Why should people, put in any effort to engage with you or “your” content if you can’t even be bothered yourself?

You continually get negative feedback for this and then whinge that it’s “worse than reddit” because plenty on communities here don’t want it descending into chat agents talking to chat agents and try to frame it as “”censorship””. Grow up. You want meaningful engagement on your projects/posts, put in meaningful effort. If you can’t post text without running it through an LLM first you likely haven’t got anything meaningful to contribute anyway.

I’m not saying you are necessarily (I also find it unfortunate in terms of acronyms lol). I’m just saying how it comes off a certain way and why people may interpret it that way and may be engaging with it as such.

Just Asking Questions (JAQing off) is a thing, it’s a form of trolling where people who either already have a POV or aren’t really actually interested in answers engage in discussion, typically in bad faith.

For example if you ask “do you think COVID-19 was engineered…” (given the conspiracy theorism inherent in the topic) and someone replies with an answer (no) to which you think reply “yes but virus can be easily engineered and released” and every response contains some variant of “I’m just asking a question”. You can probably see how it fits a pattern.

Forcibly retiring the CEO would achieve nothing. Even if somehow, in some fantasy, there existed a CEO who would say “nah, I’ll turn down this boatload of cash from idiots trying to cash in on AI, who want to buy out our current and foreseeable future supply, for the sake of domestic consumers”. They’d be ejected from their companies by their respective boards/shareholders so fast they’d burn up in the upper atmosphere. Blame the people marketing these glorified text predictors as “artificial intelligence”.

What about the attack on the wookies?

That one person? The manager or owner. When I worked at a bar if you kicked off at a FoH like this you’d be asked to calm down or leave. It’s better that way so a chef who’s probably running on 6 hours sleep and lethal-to-normal-humans blood caffeine levels doesn’t come out to see why you made a staff member cry. Also, no touchy the staff, thanks.

This is mobile game ad quality comic or I’d ask if it’s AI.

That’s doesn’t really make sense. The water bath itself usually contains a heating element. Even in that scenario, the water temp is still limited to 100C, would boil off and the oven would just be cooking the sous vide equipment and the vacuum bag. The thermal limit is an inherent property of water where it transition from its liquid to gaseous phase.

I just object to 99% of advertising. If someone walked up to me in the street and interrupted what I was doing to try and get me to buy something I’d tell them to fuck off. I was fine with banner ads. Even animated ones. Then they had obnoxious audio, took over screen space and/or auto played. YouTube went from a 1-2 five second ads to ads over a minute. So now they all get blocked.

Bonus rant: Billboards are eco vandalism. You drive from my former home town to the beach and go from a bunch of green farming country, beautiful forest and mountains to coastlands. With billboards trying their best to fuck it up along the way. Fuck ignoring it, it’s a pleasure actively blocking it so these parasites waste money.

This is not a group that makes public statements often. they only do it as last resort.

Which has nothing to do with my statement. Commenting before now means they would have commented the same amount, but sooner. Even if it’s still well after it’s obvious to the general public.

And I’m not speculating this has been common practice for the intelligence community for literally 100 years now.

Unless you are a part of the US intelligence apparatus, your remarks on why they’ve not commented before now literally cannot be anything but speculation.

thank fucking god you’d all fail lol

Incredible. Turning criticism of annoyingly condescending and round-about style of question-talking into a scenario where in fact, you are the teacher, failing everyone else.

You mean apart from to avoid seeming incompetent and lacking influence retroactively like with Hormuz? Hardly superficial when they could have made that stance apparent at any point before now to meet that very same objective. Also, not sure why you wouldn’t have opened with this speculation rather than lead with round about questions, that only seemingly make sense after you pose this hypothesis. Your assumptions have much more faith in the US administration than most may still have.

Also, this isn’t a classroom and you’re not a teacher. Just open with your speculation next time and drop the question-talking, “look people” nonsense.

Their point is (I assume), this observation is very obvious, very old and that anyone could have told you Israel would attempt to torpedo any peace deal long before now.

I built

Bro you didn’t even build this post.