• FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    25
    ·
    1 day ago

    Ironically, I’m not sure it matters.

    people running bots are still a large section of an OS’s market share. Microsoft wouldn’t hesitate to include bots and such like because it inflates the appearance that “everyone just uses it”. which does in fact drive up usage.

    People running bots are still people using computers and such.

    • sanitationOP
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      3
      Aquileo | arrow-down
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      if I would to run bots I would only ever use windows or mac osx user agents. I would never use linux

      • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
        Aquileo | link
        Aquileo | fedilink
        English
        Aquileo | arrow-up
        1
        ·
        Aquileo | edit-2
        24 hours ago

        I’m pretty sure that they’re talking about people deploying hundreds of VMs in a single go… In which case, licensing fees start racking up; and certain kinds of linux are very good at that kind of deployment.

        once you start walking away from end-user computing; as an example, MS holds only 8% of all web-facing servers, where Unix (including linux,) is 90%. Linux distros specifically, are something like 61%. Nobody has even mentions apple’s macOS server options. Roughly half of professional devs use windows as the daily driver; but that largely has to do with organizations and integration with other MS products (like office.)

        IMO, more telling in this conversation is the supercomputers… which are entirely some form of linux. And also, MS’s own Azure, clients mostly use linux. And for good reason kubernettes and docker were designed for linux, and it’s just easier. Also, there’s no per-instance license fees for your VM’s if you’re using linux. there is for microslop.

    • 8uurg@lemmy.world
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 day ago

      Classic bots (e.g. standard web crawlers, as used by search engines, that report their both nature inside their user agent) or the modern LLM-controlled bots that control a full modern browser that also runs javascript?

      Because I can imagine they account for the first category, while missing the latter, which have become increasingly more prominent.

        • 8uurg@lemmy.world
          Aquileo | link
          Aquileo | fedilink
          English
          Aquileo | arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          It doesn’t have to be on purpose. Web crawlers like Google’s specifically identify themselves as a bot. A headless browser just acts like any normal browser, and uses the same user agent as one, just controlled by code rather than a keyboard and mouse.