• 43 Posts
  • 792 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
Aquileo | cake
Cake day: October 8th, 2023

Aquileo | help-circle
  • ThunderComplex@lemmy.todaytolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldArch Linux is a Tamagotchi for IT nerds
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    3
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    I don’t know where my Linux journey takes me next yet, but I only half way agree with this post. Arch is not quite as bad as this post makes it out to be, but there’s definitely always a bit of russian roulette involved in whether your system boots tomorrow or not (most of the time it does).
    I just had my EndeavourOS (which is just a thin layer on top of Arch) kill itself and some weird-ass hyperspecific flags in the initrd build process brought it back to life.
    Tho in the ~10 years of using arch now I’d say it was still preferable to the extremely stable experience, and I don’t think recommending Debian Stable is such a good idea either.
    Yeah I could unfuck my EOS system with a bit of trickery, but once you get a good franken debian going, when that thing breaks there’s no rescue.
    I’ve had some stuff on Arch break after an upgrade too because some config variable names changed. I rember when I had KDE with i3 going and one day the desktop was gone. Was just because the variable names in KDE had changed and a quick i3 config change was all that was needed.
    Having to selectively install packages from other sources because the main repo will keep you on a too outdated version for 6 months is just not a viable idea in today’s world.

    There are luckily more than just these 2 options.















  • ThunderComplex@lemmy.todaytolinuxmemes@lemmy.world#Blessed
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    honestly idk how much of a diff it makes and I really don’t care. I wholeheartedly disagree that it’s a massive win if the system catches a few cheaters if the system is designed around “guilty until proven innocent”.
    It’s absolutely possible to design a game in a way that makes cheating basically impossible or severely nerfs it without an anti-cheat. And even if you didn’t want to do that, the fact that dedicated servers have become a incredibly rare sight also contributes to this issue.
    It’s all for the bottom line. Spend as little time in development as possible and extract as much money from players as possible, at all costs.
    I just can’t sit here and say kernel level anti-cheat is good if it works.