Update: Although we officially still have a few days remaining on this vote, it seems clear that this proposal won’t be voted in.

Thanks to everyone for their feedback and votes! I had expected a split vote on this one and it turned out around 1/3 for the proposal and 2/3 against, so that is a quite emphatic no! And of course, we will respect the vote.

I hope we can maybe revisit our instance blocking policies more generally after lemmy has properly working per-user instance blocks, as some folks commented as it will open up more options for personal choice. For example, we could keep a list of sanctioned instances (like csam site) as it works now, but maintain a separate list of “use with caution” instances (aka hesitations in fediseer) that are blocked by default in each user’s personal blocklist. But now users could choose to enable those sites for themselves if they wanted to.

For me, that seems like the best overall solution for user choice, and for the new user experience. But it may not sound good to you folks, so that’s why we have the voting system in place so we can get quality feedback and also hopefully generate ideas for improvements that will benefit the community.

On that note, anyone can contact me or any of the site admins if they have a proposal they want to appear here on the governance community, and we’ll be happy to help you out.

Unruffled


Hi mateys. I’m gonna keep this short and sweet because I don’t really have any skin in the game on this one. I am in fact quite happy to leave this decision up to the wider dbzer0 community. On that note, please do not comment on this post unless you are a dbzer0 user - we’d prefer not to have anyone else weighing in.

This post isn’t to convince anyone to re-federate or otherwise. In fact, our admin team genuinely doesn’t know for sure what our community sentiment is on the topic, or whether or not it’s worth a try. My guess is that the community will be quite divided on the topic, as many users are on the topic of hexbear. But the only way to find out for sure is to ask you, so here we are.

But I will say that for me personally, although we still have the occasional drama, and despite past run-ins, I have slowly grown to appreciate having some hexbear users around to help balance out all the turbolibs. While I think its fair to say our instance and theirs will never see eye-to-eye on certain topics, we have coexisted with them in relative calm over the past 12 months. If we can achieve harmonya ceasefire with hexbear, then maybe we could do the same with lemmygrad?

I’d also prefer our users to make their own choices with regard to instance blocking of leftist sites in particular.

Obviously there will be some folks here that will hate this idea, and some who think it is worth a try and/or would like to make their own choices with regards to blocking. All I will ask is that you go have a look at lemmygrad.ml before you vote, and ask yourself if there is anything posted there you think warrants keeping them defederated?

Because this might be a divisive topic, I’m setting the threshold for this proposal succeeding at >66.6% majority rather than the default >50% so that there is a clear mandate.

The proposal is as follows:

That dbzer0 removes lemmygrad.ml from our blocked instances list for a 1-month trial period. Another vote will then be conducted to either federate permanently or to reinstate the instance block.

Notes

  • AFAIK none of our admins have discussed this with lemmygrad prior to this post, so we don’t know how they will respond, even if this vote succeeds. But having just checked, we are not currently blocked from their end, so in theory re-federating will be a straightforward process (at least technically).
  • We really don’t want to cause a big rift in our instance over this, so please there is really no need to get into heated arguments (I mean, what are the chances? Lol). Your vote is what counts most and we will commit to be guided by the voting outcome.
  • If this vote succeeds we will reach out to their admins to see if we can come to some mutual agreement about reintegrating our communities while hopefully keeping conflict to a minimum. Having said that, some conflict is probably inevitable ngl. But I think we will be able to ride it out ok.
  • I’ve covered a lot of concerns and talked about conflict a lot, so I’ll just add that the big positive of re-federating is that there will be a ton of new users and content to interact with, which will hopefully add to the Lemmy experience for our users if the proposal is voted in.

expiry: 7

  • /0 BotB
    Aquileo | shield
    MA
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    23
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    6
    ·
    Aquileo | edit-2
    1 year ago

    Acknowledged governance topic opened by https://lemmy.dbzer0.com/u/flatworm7591 Early Bird: a parrot, orangered colors Jolly Roger: an icon of pirate jolly roger skull wearing a hat, in orange-red, black and white colors A book with a loaf of bread in the cover  in orange-red, black and white colors Deck Hand: An icon of anchor crossed with two staves in orange-red, black and white colors First Mate: a pirate ship's steering wheel, orangered color

    This is a simple majority vote. The final tally is as follows:

    • For: First Mate: a pirate ship's steering wheel, orangered color Powder Monkey: An icon of powder barrel in orange-red, black and white colors Vouched: a minimalist compass icon. Orangered color First Mate: a pirate ship's steering wheel, orangered color Vouched: a minimalist compass icon. Orangered color First Mate: a pirate ship's steering wheel, orangered color
    • Against: Vouched: a minimalist compass icon. Orangered color (5), MVP: a star icon, in orange-red, black and white colors (2), Deck Hand: An icon of anchor crossed with two staves in orange-red, black and white colors (4), Threadiverse Enjoyer: An icon of a doubloon with a black hole in the center in orange-red, black and white colors (3), Powder Monkey: An icon of powder barrel in orange-red, black and white colors (1), First Mate: a pirate ship's steering wheel, orangered color (1)
    • Local Community: -0.6
    • Outsider sentiment: Positive
    • Total: -10.6
    • Percentage: 25.00%

    This vote has concluded on 2025-07-23 03:17:20 UTC


    Reminder that this is a pilot process and results of voting are not set in stone.

    • Redjard
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      6
      ·
      Aquileo | edit-2
      1 year ago

      For an exact tally at 2025-07-19 13:55 UTC:

      Internal: 85 for, 149 against
      Outside: 39 for, 20 against
      This info is from gregtech.eu I think, with 17 upvotes and 0 downvotes unaccounted for from defederated instances like .ml and hexbear (hexbear has downvotes disabled).

      The huge negative total is from the supporter votes.

      As an aside, I think when one of the tallies of “For” or “Against” has enough votes to turn from a list to a bucket-list (i.e. object and number of occurrences, not a list of objects with repeats), then the other should do the same. Else it’s a bit confusing to read.

        • Redjard
          Aquileo | link
          Aquileo | fedilink
          Aquileo | arrow-up
          5
          Aquileo | arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          You are right, I have all downvotes accounted for, but I only see 93 upvotes, 16 are unaccounted for.
          My data seems to be incomplete somehow.

          Edit:
          my working theory is that the data stems from an instance defederated with hex, which blocks your votes showing up.
          Which might mean that 16 hexbears all exclusively voted up. Also maybe isn’t a good idea to let the instance vote that doesn’t have their votes intact. Though it does make for a very fitting russia-style election. Go vote, here is your first option, the upvote button and your second opti<data expunged>

  • fxomtBanneddeleted by creator
    Aquileo | shield
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    17
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    2
    ·
    Aquileo | edit-2
    10 months ago

    deleted by creator

  • NewDayRocks
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    64
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I just spent my lunch break checking out the instance and scrolling through the top weeks posts and checking out the comments.

    Hard no.

    1. Basically all their posts are political, except very pro-china, pro-marxist, anti-ukraine. Theres not a single post i consider a value add if it appeared in my scroll. Even if I gave the users and their viewpoints the benefit of the doubt, this would be like adding /r/china, /r/russia, /r/communism to my subs. I can’t think of a single reason i want this.

    2. I’m not giving the users the benefit of the doubt. Their comments are indistinguishable from what a ccp or Russian employee would post.

    All we would be doing is opening a potential vector for propagandists to attack. They post nothing of interest.

  • Marn
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    53
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    1
    ·
    Aquileo | edit-2
    1 year ago

    One of the lines in the sand for me is when people are unironically pro North Korea. I don’t want that on my feed.

    And to a lesser extent I don’t want to see weird tankie bootlicking of China either. And I’m not talking about legit good things China has done when compared to other superpowers, I’m talking weird posts that read like full propaganda state sponsored bs, and if you disagree with them in any way they will dig through your intire account history to try and find something they can use instead of actually having a discussion about the topic you originally disagreed with.

    Authoritarians don’t want open discussion they will just link you half a shitty book explaining how there’s actually no such thing as authoritarianism.

    Edit: I’d like to add that searching lemmygrad for Ukraine will show some really awful takes. I want freedom for Ukraine same as Palestine, Tebet, Hong kong, el Salvador, ect just because the main empire in the west is on the fascism side of authoritarianism doesn’t mean I will cozy up to other authoritarians.

      • Redjard
        Aquileo | link
        Aquileo | fedilink
        Aquileo | arrow-up
        20
        Aquileo | arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You do still get those in comment sections of dbzer posts then.
        Also I’m not sure if lg posts on dbzer subs would essentially form enclaves, where if enough dbzer users block them they basically get the space for themselves but external visitors and new users are seeing that lemmygrad lite on our instance.

      • Marn
        Aquileo | link
        Aquileo | fedilink
        Aquileo | arrow-up
        16
        Aquileo | arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I joined this instance because it drew a line in the sand. Non authoritarian spaces are so rare online.

        • алсааас [she/her]
          Aquileo | link
          Aquileo | fedilink
          Aquileo | arrow-up
          15
          Aquileo | arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          Federating with grad doesn’t magically change the structure and makeup of this instance, it will still have the same governance, communities, admins etc…

          And as already said, your personal boundaries are not violated by this, as you can define them yourself here on the Fediverse (there is a feature called “block”, yk)

    • Tomorrow_Farewell [any, they/them]@hexbear.net
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      10
      Aquileo | arrow-down
      24
      ·
      Aquileo | edit-2
      1 year ago

      One of the lines in the sand for me is when people are unironically pro North Korea. I don’t want that on my feed.

      One of your lines in the sand is when people are against colonialism and in favour of anti-colonial liberation, then. No doubt because you uncritically believe the same people who said ‘but Iraq has WMDs!’ and have lied about and demonised their other enemies.

      I want freedom for Ukraine same as Palestine

      Then you want Ukraine to be free from NATO, as opposed to being its yet another glorified military base meant to threaten the colonial hegemon’s enemies, to invade them, and to carry out terror attacks on NATO’s behalf.

      Tebet

      Tibet is not under serfdom. It was freed decades ago.

      Hong kong

      Good news. The colonial overlords in NATO have handed Hong Kong over a couple of decades ago.

      just because the main empire in the west is on the fascism side of authoritarianism doesn’t mean I will cozy up to other authoritarians.

      Considering that it’s ‘authoritarians’ who have contributed the most to anti-colonial liberation, this is a a massive self-report.

      • Marn
        Aquileo | link
        Aquileo | fedilink
        Aquileo | arrow-up
        22
        Aquileo | arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Can a north Korean speak out about government abuse? What about a south Korean? We both know the answers to that.

        A classic tankie tactic is to talk about their atrocities as if there was no other choice. Fuck that noise. But you cought my spelling error while I’m on mobile so I guess you win this round! Fucking classic tankie! This is a small example of bad faith arguments I don’t enjoy spending much time on tbh. Can you say a single thing bad about China or North Korea? Just 1 maybe 2 if you’re hardcore? I generally spend more time talking about the problems of the west but the fact that tankies see no evil just makes me look at you the same as a dogmatic MAGA and I don’t want that on my feed either.

        The west and east is responsible for a more atrocities than I can remember off the top of my head, but guess what it’s generally authoritarians doing everything than can to increase their domination. I opose authoritarianism. I understand the world is not going to reflect my beliefs any time soon.

        China has brought so many out of poverty while investing in renewable energy and truly opensouce Ai I see that as good and it gives me hope. That doesn’t mean I’m not going to say I don’t smell shit when there’s shit on my face.

        Do you understand the definition of chauvinism? I spend more time calling out western authoritarianism than eastern, and I see most western anarchists do the same.

  • dethedrus
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    46
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    No thank you. I have zero interest in dealing with genocide apologists, regardless of their purported idealogical leanings.

  • BootyEnthusiast
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    37
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Big no.

    Echoing from what some others have said, I went back 3 days worth of content from them and found ZERO worthwhile posts.

    At least hexbear is somewhat funny in their shit posts, and it’s easy enough to block or filter users who constantly post in their begging for money community.

    Meanwhileongrad exists for a reason. I’m content enough to see the smoke from the self immolation that happens from afar.

  • Redjard
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    27
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I tried to make Hexbear work for a while. I ended up blocking them because they kept wasting my time, having to check any source, and statement I ever saw from them, with basically all then falling apart.
    I thought maybe blocking some offending hexbear communities would be enough, but then kept seeing the same pattern on anything hexbear associated. In the end I burned out on it.

    I suspect that most others will equally come to the conclusion of instance blocking, which I think makes the pivotal problem here. Can we allow federation with an instance that the vast majority of our userbase has blocked?

    On an individual level I agree, that you can “just block lemmygrad/hexbear/ml/world/startrek” if you don’t like them for any reason. But that basically leaves interaction with that instance to all the others. It’s fine if a few do it, but if most do it, it resigns the platform to uncontested bullshitting from lemmygrads side.

    At first that might then load the mods. They can’t really block lemmygrad if they have to moderate their communities from them. But then what about the lies, misleading statements, that got me burned out. The stuff not obviously problematic, and not a rule violation either. If noone bothers checking and contesting that, or those few that do argue then get overwhelmed by lemmygrad votes and downvoted into oblivion on those enclave threads, then the uncensored state of your instance posts will be hell and we will simply be closing our eyes to it with the blocking.

    At that point, other instances will come to know us as the ones with lemmygrad brigading in our posts, and the easy solution there is not to figure out how to get rid of the lemmygrad stuff bleeding thru their own defederation, but to simply instance block us.

    In summary, I don’t think personal instance blocking helps with the nazibar problem. We can only federate if enough people will not block lemmygrad.

  • eronth
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    27
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    No. Does not sound appealing. Refed with them so a huge chunk of us get fed up and have to manually block, knowing they’re still nominally connected to the instance? I really don’t want to be surrounded by that stuff nor by people being influenced by it.

    Edit: Honestly, the more I think about it, the more I dislike it. If you hop over there and read many of their posts, they don’t just lean hard left/right, they are in a genuinely alternate reality. Like, you could move some of their posts to an alt-history roleplay and they’d make more sense. I’m down to hear different views, but I want them stemming from this reality. Harder no than before.

  • xspurnx
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    27
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    No.

    I usually don’t engage with gov-stuff because this instance is running smoothly and the users (& crew) here steer it very well.

    But on this I have to vote. Because historically if a left movement came into power, the dogmatic Marxists have always sought to persecute the other, especially more progressive (eg. antiauthoritarian), leftists - even if they cooperated with them before and/or helped the movement to succeed. There is a fascist wave and it is getting worse - but (left) authoritarians are not allies, they’re enemies (sooner or later).

  • Mataresian
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    26
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    A hell no, how can I make sure my vote is tallied? I usually don’t vote but in this case I’m heavily against. I’m not against opposing sides, but only if the opposing side of open to other opinions as well, lemmygrad is not really open with extreme views.

  • ragebutt
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    35
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    Do not defederate from any instance unless they are actively malicious (eg flooding with illegal content, targeting users with harassment/doxxing, or exploiting something). Though the second one is tricky as what constitutes “harassment” is tricky.

    A user has the option to block instances if they feel content on said instance is offensive or disagreeable to them.

    Rather than deny autonomy to users, refederate, and allow users to practice their own autonomy. If they’re terrified of the spooky leftists they are free to block the instance

    • Apathy Tree
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      36
      Aquileo | arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      Go spin up your own server with zero defederation policy and see how that works out for you. It will not be pleasant, that’s for sure.

      Everyone likes to say “wahh don’t defederate!!” But grad was defederated years ago for reasons, and the community decided on it back then, like this is asking to bring them back.

      Or you can go find a server that federates with them if you want. There are probably several. Have fun.

      • ragebutt
        Aquileo | link
        Aquileo | fedilink
        English
        Aquileo | arrow-up
        22
        Aquileo | arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        What are the reasons aside from they have speech that you dislike and could easily hide from your feed

  • auraithx
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    25
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    2
    ·
    Aquileo | edit-2
    1 year ago

    Better to stay defederated IMO.

    They are ban heavy for daft reasons so ruins the experience for new users. It’d be different if they had daft ideas but engaged with debate; but they don’t - and it’s just feeding more people into an echo chamber that has some people just as far gone as MAGA.

    Recent years have taught me the dangers of that and how little most people are able to critically think about things. Less of an issue on this instance I imagine, but even anti-authoritarian spaces are being increasingly captured by authoritarian interests.

    Id support the top 5 worst offenders from the power tripping mods community to be defederated by default across as many instances as we can convince. Punish censorship.