• 17 Posts
  • 996 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
Aquileo | cake
Cake day: June 8th, 2023

Aquileo | help-circle
















  • Bizarroland@kbin.socialtomemes@lemmy.worldHappens once per thread
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    6
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 years ago

    It’s a fallacy to put one vs many in an argument like this.

    Individual men were hurt by feeling classified as more dangerous to a random woman than a bear in the woods when their lived experiences place them well below that threat, even though they are aware that there is a portion of men who are more dangerous to random women in the woods than the average bear, but their responses were taken as an attack on women rather than an expression of personal indignation and further proof that men are dangerous.

    Individual women got to express their experiences and opinions in a way that got through to a lot of men and other women what they felt as a whole, but since groups are unable to address individual responses eloquently and on an even level, they trampled over a lot of innocent men.

    There are no winners in scenarios like these, and anything you add or subtract from the argument paints you in a bad light.

    The only winning move is not to play.