Smart glasses without cameras: interesting, functional.

Smart glasses with cameras: walking privacy crimes.

12 year investigation and trial.

Accused:

• General Motors.
• Firestone.
• Standard Oil of California.
• Phillips Petroleum.
• Mack Trucks.

Verdict:
Guilty. GM was fined $5,000 (equivalent to $62,000 in 2025).

Yahuh. The US legal system.

Well, considering the cashier is sprouting shoots and leaves, I think it’s more than that.

Like maybe, organic and natural food = cashier turning into a tree = birds nesting.

Which is some coke-fueled craziness.

This GIF ain’t animated, PNG would be smaller while still lossless. But I do see that the original is GIF…

Gary I don’t get this one but I’m just gonna assume you did a lot of cocaine in 1980

I’m 100% in support of Ukraine, but do they not use the exact same technology for most of their own drones?

I’ve seen vast swathes of land covered by fibre-optic (plastic) cables from Ukrainian drone operations.

If anything, I’d think working more closely with Israel will provoke blowback attacks, rather than increasing security. It’s much easier for ISIL to turn some EU citizen into a suicide attacker when they can point to their own government openly collaborating with a genocidal fascist ethnostate.

Direct market manipulation wasn’t getting him enough profit so now he’s literally selling access to his market-manipulation announcements.

I’d say this is literally criminal evidence in a future court date if this was any country other than the US (or Russia, etc).

What a reactionary zealot response.

This is a dumb exclusionary policy being fairly pointed out, not ageism.

I’ll explain it with a comparision of the language used.

The language used for benches like this in my country, Australia: “Priority seating. Please stand for seniors, pregnant, or handicapped people”.

Priority, based on needs. Anyone can use it otherwise.

The language used in this sign: “Benches are for seniors are handicapped citizens only”

Exclusionary, based on privilege and needs. If you are old and infirm and a citizen ONLY YOU may ever use this bench, and if you’re not a citizen (tourist, asylum seeker, migrant worker) you can fuck off regardless of your needs. Pregnant women? Who cares, they’re not old and they’re women.

This is not a subtle distinction. This is language used to assert a hierarchy and exclude underclasses, and it’s embedded into every aspect of US society without most people even noticing because they’ve never seen different.

I disagree wholeheartedly. This is a dumb exclusionary policy being fairly pointed out, not ageism.

I’ll explain it with a comparision of the language used.

The language used for benches like this in my country, Australia: “Priority seating. Please stand for seniors and handicapped people”.

Priority, based on needs. Anyone can use it otherwise.

The language used in this sign: “Benches are for seniors are handicapped citizens only”

Exclusionary, based on privilege and needs. If you are old and infirm and a citizen ONLY YOU may ever use this bench, and if you’re not a citizen (tourist, asylum seeker, migrant worker) you can fuck off regardless of your needs.

This is not a subtle distinction. This is language used to assert a hierarchy and exclude underclasses, and it’s embedded into every aspect of your society without most people even noticing because they’ve never seen different.

Very standard conservative nanny state action from Singapore.

But where will they find someone else with a head shaped like a football

Absolutely, but I’d be more specific.

Customers usually have rights to refund or partial refund if a purchase is not “fit for purpose” or “as advertised”.

If a game/movie/show is purchased on the offer of unlimited access now and into the future, and that access is then revoked, the customer should be by law entitled to compensation - either full refund if the product has never been used (which is surprisingly common), or a partial refund based on number or duration of times accessed.

Providers would be a LOT more careful about revoking access to purchased materials if that action had a monetary cost associated with it.

“Techbro” doesn’t rhyme with “third”, thus robbing it of its Nazi parallels.

‘Terrorist’ is a label of perspective, historically.

Please let this mean he’s finally going to stop being cast in movies.

Don’t forget to sprinkle in some GFC with the banks it’ll take down.

I agree with the gist, and I’m probably dumb but how would he both sell high and sell to himself?

Is that a sink? A racoon shower / bath?

I presume this is at a vet.

Americans - help me please, I am not knowledgeable in the ways of the racoon and need context for this adorable mound.

When they fire all the people who won’t support their idiocy, this is what’s left.