• ViceroTempus@lemmy.world
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    28
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    PETA has always felt like a corporate strategy in the same vein as the oil companies infiltrating green movements and steering them away from nuclear back in the 70’s and 80’s. Like PETA exists to make Vegans and Vegetarians look bad, imo.

  • whereitsat@lemmy.zip
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    9
    ·
    7 days ago

    lol. they’re also using the aesthetic of a mormon wife to sell their message. that lady buys 20 pounds of beef a week.

    trust me, i used to live in salt lake city.

  • Lojcs@piefed.social
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    15
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    12
    ·
    7 days ago

    Surprising that anti-Peta sentiment is so prevalent here on Lemmy, kind of thought that would be left behind at Reddit. Aside from their deliberately abrasive marketing and the misinformation about them kidnapping people’s pets to euthanize them, what did they do?

    • zamithal@programming.dev
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      11
      Aquileo | arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      While animal activism is a good thing, PETA has a unique “the ends justify the means approach” that gives other activists a bad name. Historically they were famous for extreme publicity stunts to raise awareness for animals who can’t advocate for themselves, but in recent years function more as a lobbyists interweaving animal protectionism with various unrelated issues. These lobbying efforts are contributing to the erosion and brain drain of American academic science among other important issues.

      Full disclosure, I’m biased and affiliated with a non-profit trying to save academic research in Oregon. PETA has been the largest source of misinformation, using a huge amount of money to establish billboard campaigns, targeted ads, and misleading polls to paint the research center as villainous. Everyone wants to protect animals but the nuance of protecting life saving research dependant on animal models is a much harder position to argue than “save the animals”.

      Research is slowly drifting away from animal testing, but today many scientific breakthroughs (some concrete examples currently under threat include a cure for HIV, GLP1S, Non-hormonal birth control) rely on animals and non-animal alternatives haven’t yet caught up in capability.

      If your interested in learning more, Save Science Oregon is a website we’ve built to battle some of this information.

    • DragonOracleIX@lemmy.ml
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      11
      Aquileo | arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 days ago

      PETA would be more respected if they weren’t so batshit crazy. Their is literally no line that they wouldn’t cross just for free publicity. They are just as bad as religion when it comes to rampant proselytizing.

    • WizardJr@lemmy.today
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      5
      Aquileo | arrow-down
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      “They kill animals!”

      That’s overwhelmingly the critique people have of PETA. They humanely euthanize instead of just letting animals starve on the streets. Not one viable alternative has been proposed here beyond “let other shelters try to adopt them” like there are shelters turning animals away for the sake of turning them away and not because they literally don’t have the capacity to do anything.

      That’s why the overwhelming majority of these complaints are just vague innuendo about PETA doing “cruelty,” whatever that means exactly.

      • WizardJr@lemmy.today
        Aquileo | link
        Aquileo | fedilink
        Aquileo | arrow-up
        3
        Aquileo | arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        They say it’s because “PETA is crazy!” or some other non-statement like they don’t turn around and bitch about vegans as a whole.

        People don’t hate them because they’re “annoying” or “crazy.” They hate them because they’re right. No one wants to be confronted by their Jungian shadow.

  • boaratio@lemmy.world
    Aquileo | cake
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    5
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    4
    ·
    6 days ago

    Kinda tracks with their history. PETA kills animals that they take in at a much higher rate than any other animal shelter. But yeah, keep generating click bait headlines to advance your cause.

  • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    1
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    26
    ·
    7 days ago

    There is no “AI”. If you’re claiming that this image was generated with a computer, then of course. Who cares? There are real problems out there. “AI” is literally being used to genocide palestinians.

    • HCSOThrowaway@lemmy.world
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      13
      ·
      Aquileo | edit-2
      7 days ago

      There is no “AI”. If you’re claiming that this image was generated with a computer, then of course.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pedantry

      Who cares? There are real problems out there. “AI” is literally being used to genocide palestinians.

      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_herring

      The strange part of your second bit is you attack OP for being anti-AI while you yourself are anti-AI, evidently not realizing that reducing PETA’s use of AI would definitely reduce the use of AI against Palestinians in a simple funding sense; paying money to AI companies to make ads like PETA is presumably doing/supporting helps the companies that develop AI weapons that are used against Palestinians.

      Classic purity test infighting to make yourself feel better by attacking someone, even if they’re your ally.