Gentle nerd freak of the pacific northwest. All nation states are vermin.

  • 5 Posts
  • 2.15K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
Aquileo | cake
Cake day: June 26th, 2024

Aquileo | help-circle









  • Show me the profit

    not nearly as useful as anyone says it is, if at all.

    It’s not about profit, it’s about control.

    Yes, for many users ai is just an inaccurate summary generator. Or if your job involves creating pointless bullshit reports (as most do) you can save some time - big fucking deal, for sure.

    But as a tool of power and control they are brutally useful. Llms can replace the search engine and the site - google, wikipedia and reddit controlled by the same gatekeeper. Want information disappeared? Way easier.

    They’re also the best way elites have to weaponize vast resources in the information age. Being able to instantly create and automate thousands of fake social media accounts to argue down your opponents is now a power the rich have - they don’t have to buy those shills and keep them happy and active the old fashioned way.

    Saying llms are not useful is like telling a lord their castle is a waste of stone and labour. It’s literally power, and they know it.





  • Hegar@fedia.iotoFuck AI@lemmy.worldMoving in the right direction
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    7
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    I love this kind of law because it’s likely impossible for ai companies to comply.

    Could be there’ll be some exemptions if the user employs workarounds, because at the moment it’s pretty easy to get llms to tell you things they aren’t supposed to.

    But if the laws are written right with actual penalties that may force the companies to create a product that’s capable of having safety parameters - something llms don’t currently seem capable of.






  • Hegar@fedia.iotomemes@lemmy.worldThat's real 😂😂😂😂
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    36
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    6
    ·
    14 days ago

    Fahrenheit is demonstrably better for describing temperature as experienced by a human.

    It’s just not though. F uses a wider range of numbers to describe common outside air temperature, but more numbers =/= better.

    I’ve lived in both F and C countries and farenheit is not easier, more intuitive, more sensible or better in any way. A number is a number. The extra precision of F is not super useful - no one can really feel a 1F difference. The freezing point of water does make a huge difference, so knowing above/below zero C is useful, but above/below 32F is no harder.

    This argument that F is somehow more suitable for human temperatures is something you see online, but as someone comfortable with both i can say there is functionally no difference, except that metric is compatible with the rest of the world.