• leanleft@lemmy.ml
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    1
    ·
    14 hours ago

    go to https://www.bonappetit.com/ and watch the price suddenly jump!

    bonappetit.com 4d.condenastdigital.com * block
    bonappetit.com ads-static.conde.digital * block
    bonappetit.com allure.com * block
    bonappetit.com apis.google.com * block
    bonappetit.com architecturaldigest.com * block
    bonappetit.com bd1cec50-00d1-4ce9-9572-785857419a1e.edge.permutive.app * block
    bonappetit.com cdn.gladly.com * block
    bonappetit.com cntraveler.com * block
    bonappetit.com conde.digital * block
    bonappetit.com condenastdigital.com * block
    bonappetit.com edge.permutive.app * block
    bonappetit.com epicurious.com * block
    bonappetit.com gladly.com * block
    bonappetit.com glamour.com * block
    bonappetit.com globalservices.conde.digital * block
    bonappetit.com google.com * block
    bonappetit.com gp-prod.conde.digital * block
    bonappetit.com gq.com * block
    bonappetit.com id-mapper-service.gp-prod.conde.digital * block
    bonappetit.com lil.condenastdigital.com * block
    bonappetit.com martech.condenastdigital.com * block
    bonappetit.com newyorker.com * block
    bonappetit.com permutive.app * block
    bonappetit.com pitchfork.com * block
    bonappetit.com privacy.condenastdigital.com * block
    bonappetit.com self.com * block
    bonappetit.com teenvogue.com * block
    bonappetit.com vanityfair.com * block
    bonappetit.com variants.conde.digital * block
    bonappetit.com vogue.com * block
    bonappetit.com wired.com * block
    bonappetit.com www.allure.com * block
    bonappetit.com www.architecturaldigest.com * block
    bonappetit.com www.cntraveler.com * block
    bonappetit.com www.epicurious.com * block
    bonappetit.com www.glamour.com * block
    bonappetit.com www.gq.com * block
    bonappetit.com www.newyorker.com * block
    bonappetit.com www.self.com * block
    bonappetit.com www.teenvogue.com * block
    bonappetit.com www.vanityfair.com * block
    bonappetit.com www.vogue.com * block
    bonappetit.com www.wired.com *  block           
    

    goddamnit. all i wanted was a muffin !
    why are you counting my pockets so aggressively ?

    • Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      5
      Aquileo | arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      You’re missing the point, library computers are used by a lot of poor people so those computers have cookies and other fingerprinting that makes companies think the users of those machines can’t afford normal prices so they get even lower prices than if you had completely cleared your chace cookies fresh device and all that.

    • atomicbocks@sh.itjust.works
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      99
      Aquileo | arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      That doesn’t help anymore. These days they use device identifiers and IP addresses and all kinds of stuff like that to see if you’re the same person or not. I would imagine that in this case going to your own laptop or desktop would result in the same prices.

      If you really want to hide try a browser like the Mullvad browser that specifically resizes and changes things used for fingerprinting.

  • the_riviera_kid@lemmy.world
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    48
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 days ago

    It’s not the library, it’s the cache you never clear. She could have done this just as easily at home on a browser with a private window she hadn’t signed into.

        • mpdarkguy@piefed.world
          Aquileo | link
          Aquileo | fedilink
          English
          Aquileo | arrow-up
          19
          ·
          3 days ago

          I tried using waterfox and librewolf i think.

          Every click on a new site was 5 capchas, its horrendously unusable, since probably they assume that all obfuscated user agent and other data are bots

          • chunkystyles@sopuli.xyz
            Aquileo | link
            Aquileo | fedilink
            English
            Aquileo | arrow-up
            8
            ·
            3 days ago

            I tried LibreWolf. It was such a bad experience.

            It’s a shame that the Internet is so bad that the browser has to go to such extreme lengths to give you any privacy that it makes the experience awful.

            • WoodYouLookAtThat@lemmy.today
              Aquileo | link
              Aquileo | fedilink
              English
              Aquileo | arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 days ago

              It definitely isn’t as graceful in the every day experience, but keeping a profile with resist fingerprinting disabled has helped the few times I need to get past turnstiles and whatnot that otherwise loop

              It really is a shame that it’s come to this rock paper scissors war between the server’s usage, the user’s experience, and privacy. Currently privacy is what has been cut in favor of the other two. You have to work to maintain privacy now

        • klankin@piefed.ca
          Aquileo | link
          Aquileo | fedilink
          English
          Aquileo | arrow-up
          9
          ·
          3 days ago

          Unless you’re running a virtual GPU (and changing it often enough to remain anonymous), tracking pixels are pretty difficult to obfuscate (the exact thermal environment your PC is in will even effect timing).

          And thanks to big tech this state of the art tracking is on essentially every website.

          Clearing site data/private mode is a way to ask nicely that websites don’t track you, but user intention hasn’t been respected for around 3 decades by now.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 days ago

      It’s also using an iPhone instead of a desktop PC. Retailers think all iPhone users are rich (or at least less price-sensitive).

  • GoatSynagogue@lemmy.world
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    11
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 days ago

    This is not true in general. Some sites could charge you more based on your fingerprinting, but very few do as it’s easily proven and would cause massive backlash.

  • FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    19
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    2
    ·
    Aquileo | edit-2
    3 days ago

    Clear your cookies and use a VPN. (And your browser probably has a setting you can enable to clear your cookies automatically every time you close out.)

  • Séimhe (sé / é)@lemmy.world
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 days ago

    Is it possible to instruct the browser, via extensions or something, to simply withhold that kind of information? I know websites need to render the page differently for different browsers and OS, but when it comes to things involving payment I’d rather deal with the browser quirks than get ripped off.

    • pivot_root@lemmy.world
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      8
      ·
      3 days ago

      If I were a company looking to optimize profit by pricing goods at whatever limit the targeted consumer demographic would be willing to pay for, I would use a VPN as a signal to raise the price.

      It doesn’t matter who that consumer is behind the VPN. The VPN itself is a monthly subscription, and that indicates he/she has at enough disposable income to afford non-essential services.

      • CultLeader4Hire@lemmy.world
        Aquileo | link
        Aquileo | fedilink
        English
        Aquileo | arrow-up
        3
        ·
        3 days ago

        To that point the library computer is free. I don’t know anything about VPNs or how to use them and I definitely shouldn’t have to pay for something for basic privacy. Library users improve the demand for libraries. Using a library computer is a win in basically all ways that really matter.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    7
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    25
    ·
    3 days ago

    Hmm. I’ve never seen a difference between online prices and the price on the shelf at the store.

    Are the prices lower than what is on the shelf?

    Maybe this is something to do with New York. I doubt it’s true anywhere else. Maybe other big cities.

    • zikzak025@lemmy.world
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Online is usually cheaper for a lot of goods. Two days ago, I wanted to get a physical copy of an older game that is getting harder to find. It was way more expensive buying from a physical store, so I searched for it online. The price difference for the exact same product between searching in my PC’s browser and through my phone was about $8.

      My phone tracks my habits more easily, so I think they assumed I’d be more likely to buy from more expensive sellers if they just withheld showing me the cheaper ones. I could see the same more expensive options on my PC, but nothing below a certain price point on my phone. In a physical store, they’re only able to advertise one price. But online, when there can be multiple origin points for a product in a single market, they can simply withhold showing you some of them.

    • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      I find this hard to believe as well. There is very little information given and it seems more likely they accidentally shopped at two different targets. I’ve heard the same claim about plane tickets, also mentioned in the article, and have never experienced it as well. Though there is a lot more evidence to back that claim up.

      My comparisons have been between my work laptop and my personal computer. Two completely different machines, different IP addresses and vastly different habits on those machines. I never even log into my accounts on my work machine.