• yucandu@lemmy.world
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    206
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    1
    ·
    22 days ago

    A 24hr waiting period to use a competitor’s product has to be one of the most blatant anti-competitive behaviour in history.

  • percent@infosec.pub
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    91
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    1
    ·
    21 days ago

    I genuinely appreciate the cause, but to sign this, I have to provide PII, agree to their terms of service and privacy policy, and get automatically opted-in to their mailing list that I’ll have to unsubscribe from later.

    So to petition against this shitty tech stuff, I have to go through this other shitty tech stuff. It sucks how normalized this all has become.

    • justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      21
      Aquileo | arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      here it makes at least some sense to verify that each person voted once. the mail list stuff is of course to much and should be optional from the beginning.

      • percent@infosec.pub
        Aquileo | link
        Aquileo | fedilink
        English
        Aquileo | arrow-up
        5
        Aquileo | arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        Anyone know if this affects GrapheneOS users? I can install GrapheneOS like 50x faster than it would take to understand what I’m legally binding myself to by signing the petition.

        • justme@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          Aquileo | link
          Aquileo | fedilink
          English
          Aquileo | arrow-up
          6
          ·
          20 days ago

          custom OS shouldn’t be effected by it. I’ll probably change soon as well.

          anyway, that is rather independent on the petition. a petition is usually not for your own short term benefit, rather for the common good, or outreach of the general problem. so doing either is for different reasons, both reasonable

    • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      23
      Aquileo | arrow-down
      2
      ·
      21 days ago

      Not only would that solve this little problem, it would reduce Google’s power and remove one’s data from the claws of US authorities (were the Patriot and Cloud acts let them mass track everybody using a Google product).

      Just make sure you chose a non-US Linux phone.

    • Cactus_Head@programming.dev
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      10
      Aquileo | arrow-down
      1
      ·
      Aquileo | edit-2
      21 days ago

      Most of the world can’t afford to buy one specific android and hope not to brick it. Most people can’t afford a google pixel and if they can, aren’t going to risk it.

      And what happens when google cuts off third party tools like MicroG. I need WhatsApp for almost everything from talking to family and friends to Work. Most of the world does, and the same is true for Facebook.

      • alfredon996@feddit.it
        Aquileo | link
        Aquileo | fedilink
        English
        Aquileo | arrow-up
        9
        Aquileo | arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 days ago

        Most people can’t afford a google pixel and if they can, aren’t going to risk it.

        And they shouldn’t. By buying Pixels you are supporting Google, the same company that is destroying Android freedom.

        Today’s best alternatives are phones that come preloaded with custom ROMs (Brax3, Fairphone, Murena, Iodé, and so on), or if you’re feeling more adventurous, a Linux phone (I have heard good things about FuriLabs FLX1).

      • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
        Aquileo | link
        Aquileo | fedilink
        English
        Aquileo | arrow-up
        5
        Aquileo | arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        Then you are fucked right? What’s app and Facebook have you.

        I too live somewhere this is expected. I said no. I won’t do it. Facebook is easy, because whatever.

        WhatsApp is harder even the doctors want to use it. But I won’t. Someone has to start saying no.

      • trilobite@lemmy.ml
        Aquileo | link
        Aquileo | fedilink
        English
        Aquileo | arrow-up
        1
        Aquileo | arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 days ago

        “I need WhatsApp for almost everything from talking to family and friends to Work. Most of the world does, and the same is true for Facebook.”

        Whatsapp and Facebook bring convienence for sure, but you can live without them. All those that know me, know i refuse to use Whatapp. Those that want to keep up with me have installed Signal. I admit that for business it can be tricky but we have to start somewhere?

  • curbstickle@anarchist.nexusM
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    63
    ·
    22 days ago

    @duckling5746@lemmy.today as a reminder the reason this is related to self-hosting should be obvious, whether in the title or the post text.

    For this one, I’ll note that this is key to self-hosting, and I think many know it. Many, myself included, use f-droid or similar 3rd party repos to manage the apps that we use with our self-hosted setup. With this change, many of the current apps we enjoy using will either need to register with Google, or essentially become unused. While there is a way to still do it, it is really messy, and requires an absolutely wild number of steps + 24hr “cooling off period”. Its ridiculous.

    Personally, I’m leaving the android ecosystem one way or the other. It may be using an android phone and hotspotting for another device running PMOS or similar, or getting a Moto with Graphene, whatever, but this change is impactful and horrendous.

    • SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      5
      Aquileo | arrow-down
      6
      ·
      22 days ago

      Not that I particularly trust Google, but they have promised to not molest the ADB pathway.

      "Are ADB installs impacted by the 24-hour waiting period for advanced flow? No, there are no changes to how ADB works. You will be able to install applications using ADB as usual. The waiting period does not apply to ADB installs. Last updated: March 23, 2026’

      https://developer.android.com/developer-verification/guides/faq

        • SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone
          Aquileo | link
          Aquileo | fedilink
          English
          Aquileo | arrow-up
          8
          Aquileo | arrow-down
          1
          ·
          Aquileo | edit-2
          22 days ago

          LADB is a native android feature. Unless they plan to kill adb entirely, what’s to stop me from doing this -

          • Download apk
          • Enable Wireless debugging
          • Pair the on-phone ADB client
          • Run something equivalent to: pm install /sdcard/Download/app.apk
          • Installation occurs through the ADB shell route.

          Because if that works, “install from Fdroid” needs just a small tweak so that the Fdroid app submits the APK through ADB.

          • curbstickle@anarchist.nexusM
            Aquileo | link
            Aquileo | fedilink
            English
            Aquileo | arrow-up
            26
            ·
            21 days ago

            The nonsense steps to even get there. The absolute nonsensical mess of lies in their claims to even do this in the first place. Lets be clear - if they wanted to block malware, they would need to be doing so from the Play store in the first place. So, lets highlight a few simple things:

            • It was only about 6 months ago that it was documented by a cybersec company that hundreds of malicious apps were downloaded quite literally tens of millions of times.
            • The number of malicious apps on the Play store have gone up, not down.
            • Banking malware has more than doubled in the past few years
            • The majority of growth (more than doubling) in the YoY were spyware apps - used for identity theft, extortion, and surveillance, and all on the Play store.
            • There are even ones specifically targeting Android TV boxes, again mostly operating unchecked on the Play store.

            To even suggest installing apps (which, lets be honest, that is what they are calling “sideloading” - doing the thing you do on your PC all the time) from a different location is the issue is far from reality. So any “promise” from them is worth functionally nothing to me.

            As I said, I’m leaving Android either way. I shouldn’t have to go through such a massive number of hoops to install on my own device.

          • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
            Aquileo | link
            Aquileo | fedilink
            English
            Aquileo | arrow-up
            3
            ·
            21 days ago

            Enable Wireless debugging

            not everyone has wifi at home, and this doesn’t work without one. It’s also very complicated for people. it is basically a wall around a garden.

            also you either have to set adb over wifi to automatically turn on when connecting to that wifi, which is not that safe, or turn it on manually every time you want to install apps or updates. with that, the recent android feature to allow 3rd party stores to update their apps without a prompt goes out the window.

    • Axolotl@feddit.it
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      12
      ·
      21 days ago

      There are already some movements, like #Keep Android Open that ask to contact local regulators and law makers, this petition is useful to have a concrete number of people that agree and that can be used officially

    • karlhungus@lemmy.ca
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      11
      Aquileo | arrow-down
      1
      ·
      21 days ago

      Companies have reversed unpopular decisions in the past (just saw a thing about Facebook reversing some AI thing). So there may be some possible chance of them reversing this decision. I’m not hopeful but the cost is cheap, and it has a better chance of success than doing nothing

      • DataCrime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        Aquileo | link
        Aquileo | fedilink
        English
        Aquileo | arrow-up
        4
        ·
        21 days ago

        Hence the proliferation of spam… It cost nearly nothing to do and has a very limited chance of return… And yet my inbox has still got 10,000 messages in it which I do nothing about.

    • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      1
      ·
      20 days ago

      I agree. Doesn’t do anything it would be better to get people to buy stock in the company and vote on what you want. Get enough people and you can make change.

      But that process is also… Gross. And expensive.

  • Felis_Catus_Domesticus@lemmy.world
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    29
    ·
    21 days ago

    Mandate that all boot loaders can be unlocked by consumers/device owners!

    That single change alone would open the floodgates of development.

    Manufacturer locked boot loaders was the single biggest mistake made in the phone world. Now just consider all the work it’ll take to reverse that simple misstep made years ago that nobody gave a single thought to.

  • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    17
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    2
    ·
    21 days ago

    Most online petitions are nothing more than a way to safely (for those targeted and for those amongst the authorities who support them even against the public interest) dissipate the common people’s righteous indignation, by making them feel like they “did something” whilst said something is just about the least impactful thing imaginable.

    (Some official ones, for example those mandating parliamentary sessions on the subject if they reach a certain threshold, might not be so, though its unclear as it really depends on the legislation around it allowing politicians to just ignore it at will)

    This bullshit will require a lot more than adding your name into a list on some corner of the web in some legal jurisdiction where they’re free to sell your private information.

    • Ooops@feddit.org
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      24
      Aquileo | arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      Petitions are useless

      Protests are useless

      Governments and corporations conspire to implement surveilance knowing what comes next

      <-- we are here

      Actual resistence

        • AmbitiousProcess (they/them)@piefed.social
          Aquileo | link
          Aquileo | fedilink
          English
          Aquileo | arrow-up
          6
          ·
          21 days ago

          The petition is only one part of the puzzle.

          Keep Android Open also says to contact your regulators and fill out Google’s developer verification survey, both of which either directly affect Google by influencing internal processes, or put regulatory pressure on them to back off.

          The Change.org petition is moreso just a way to count overall total supporters, and add one more lever of pressure that can be leveled against them. (e.g. instead of “we’ve had a lot of people contact regulators” it’s “218,000 people are actively taking the time to tell you they don’t like this”, can be cited by lawmakers, advocacy groups, etc)

          That said though, I do agree that a change.org petition on its own is… generally ineffective most of the time.

    • curbstickle@anarchist.nexusM
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      6
      Aquileo | arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 days ago

      Eh, I wouldn’t say useless.

      I’d say they only account for user sentiment at best. Which can have an impact, but I’d say incredibly unlikely that there will be an impact on this one.

      Not using android as much as possible will have a much higher impact though.

  • unitedwithme@lemmy.today
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    10
    ·
    22 days ago

    I don’t get it, how tf they gonna stop you on phones that already exist?

    A. You can disable any new OS or device updates from Google.

    B. You can keep your existing phone on Android 16 or prior (hell, I’m on 12)

    C. Use alt OS like Graphene, Lineage, Iodé, /e/OS, CalyxOS (they’re back!!), etc

    D. Sign out of Google on your phone, install F-Droid or something from APK package on FF derived browser.

    I’m sure on brands new devices with that patch, plus anyone who doesn’t disable the auto updates will be blocked. But no way no how can Google stop us all!! 🖕🖕🏻🖕🏿🖕🏼

    • i_am_not_a_robot@discuss.tchncs.de
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      25
      ·
      22 days ago

      A. It’s not an OS update. It’s part of Google Play Services.
      B. I’m pretty sure this applies even on Android 12 because it’s Google Play Services. Years back, Google started moving functionality like this into Google Play Services so your phone could get new features even if you had a bad manufacturer and OS updates were months or even years behind. It was introduced as a feature then.
      C. This does work, but some apps (notably banking apps) block non-Google Android, even if there is no legitimate security reason for doing so. This will vary by OS and even phones running the same OS. Official GrapheneOS builds for officially supported devices probably have the best compatibility with apps in terms of the apps not blocking your phone. Maybe there are some rooted phones that patch apps to bypass “integrity” checks. Some features of your phone just will not work, even if you have a third-party OS with official support for your phone (contactless payments). Hopefully the EU gets on this and at least Europeans or people who can trick their phones into thinking they are Europeans will get some of their control back.
      D. Most people can’t live without the apps that are available only on Google’s store or that require Google Play Services. That’s most apps. Even if you don’t need those specific apps, you will need to deal with other stuff like setting up Unified Push if you want to receive timely notifications. My parents are not going to set up a Unified Push gateway.

      • Axolotl@feddit.it
        Aquileo | link
        Aquileo | fedilink
        English
        Aquileo | arrow-up
        2
        ·
        21 days ago

        Most people can’t live without the apps that are available only on Google’s store or that require Google Play Services

        Example of that: governments apps, like the eID app for the european eID (which, it’s not a must for everyone but it may be for some specific people or just everyone in a country)

    • SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      11
      ·
      21 days ago

      I think the goal is to push it silently as a Google system service, rather than wait for manufacturers to ship an OS or app store update.

      There’s a real possibility your phone already has Android Developer Verifier installed and sitting dormant until enforcement begins.

      You can check for the package now:

      “com.google.android.verifier”

      If it’s there…well…

        • SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone
          Aquileo | link
          Aquileo | fedilink
          English
          Aquileo | arrow-up
          2
          ·
          21 days ago

          Like herpes, it comes back :) The second you connect to WiFi or mobile data…

          If you want to avoid it - for good - you need to install CFW. Or you need to play whackamole with firewalls. But those come with other issues.

          Big evil knows what they’re doing - switching it off and on again won’t fool em for long (if at all) :(

          • quick_snail@feddit.nl
            Aquileo | link
            Aquileo | fedilink
            English
            Aquileo | arrow-up
            2
            ·
            20 days ago

            No, it doesn’t come back. Google will not be installed by default.

            I’ve never had it on my phone because I never add gapps when installing Android.

            • SuspiciousCarrot78@aussie.zone
              Aquileo | link
              Aquileo | fedilink
              English
              Aquileo | arrow-up
              2
              ·
              20 days ago

              Well sure, if you’re installing CFW or aosp and you don’t need the ever increasing cruft that seems to rely on Play store authentication. Never install GApps, done.

              Some folks (not you or I) need to access play store to install their apps (I think even WhatsApp and Signal need it now; I couldn’t install it on my phone), 2FA, transport apps, bank apps etc.

              Catch 22 for them.

              • degoogled phone…but can’t install all the apps they need
              • Google ecosystem… but at whims of Google.
              • quick_snail@feddit.nl
                Aquileo | link
                Aquileo | fedilink
                English
                Aquileo | arrow-up
                1
                ·
                20 days ago

                Nah, and when this deadline hits, we’ll see even more people forced to remove gapps.

                And there will be a larger user base that won’t be able to use that cruft shady apps that depend on it

  • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    8
    ·
    20 days ago

    let’s get real…google isn’t going to stop. why would they? there’s zero repercussions for their aggressive strategy against their own consumers.

    so stop using their products. cut google out, entirely.