YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/957metadeth

  • 17 Posts
  • 31 Comments
Joined 4 years ago
Aquileo | cake
Cake day: March 25th, 2022

Aquileo | help-circle
  • I’m reading Ravikant Kisna’s “Meet the Savarnas”. It’s infuriating to know that there is such a rampant caste based hierarchical society in India - something which pushes mediocrity not arising out of an accident of historical relations but because it insists on doing so.

    My cover image is also extracted from there. I highly recommend this to anyone who wants to understand how caste functions in modern day India in relatively blunt and simple language.

    Marx had written about Indian caste system being slowly eradicated with the growth of migration and the Indian railways (as it was developing during his time). Many Indian communists confused their analysis by relegating it to a superstructure and thereby a lower priority for the movement.

    But as Ambedkar argues the Hindu Social Order is all invasive in this region - and he asks Indian communists to engage with this seriously. This book is the most accessible supplement to that argument in modern day.




  • No Más@lemmygrad.ml
    Aquileo | hexagon
    toCrush Agentic AI@lemmygrad.ml"Useful" is not sufficient
    ·
    Aquileo | edit-2
    19 days ago

    I get your points, thanks for being with me so far. I want to say another thing in good faith and want to know if you think it makes sense.

    MAD itself is a pretty fucked up situation for the world to be in at all.

    Capitalism has scaled up production of components that we say suck unanimously because of the state it brings the world to - for instance, plastics that do not degrade, guns, surveillance technology. These are, to me, components for useful tools in good hands or made out of processes that can be utilised better.

    If we are to resist the productive capacity tools or processes being misused, however, we have to go against the tendency of capitalism to misuse its productive capacities. And organising at the consumption level has statistically affected this tendency of capitalism to misuse/fall in wrong hands - e.g. for the BDS brands, and largely for building consensus against gun sales.

    the decision is "should I make use of what they're going to build anyway, regardless of what I say, or should I boycott it and potentially make me less effective in the struggle for liberation as a result."

    Even from a communist viewpoint, if we resist the relentless kind of upscaling of GenAI more critically we would have gained in our communities/organising spaces. I say this because the GenAI economy is always in a precarious state - with debt funded by big finance and many saying it's a "bubble about to burst". Our chance to fight this capitalism's big bet on AI can lead to a victory for the left.

    Vibecoded software due to it's tendency to bloat, risks becoming usable only when backed by a trustable producer (this ends up being big tech a lot of times). Which makes the imperative to be informed about alternatives to GenAI enabled software equally important for the organised left.

    Edit: I know you're probably not implying the left not be informed about alternatives to GenAI enabled software but, I mentioned it because if we accept that it must (be informed), an equally large part of organising would be to insulate ourselves from vibecoding.



  • No Más@lemmygrad.ml
    Aquileo | hexagon
    toCrush Agentic AI@lemmygrad.ml"Useful" is not sufficient
    ·
    19 days ago

    Would you say copyright can't be a tool for good, as you put it?

    And if AI exists in any form outside of the subscription model, without hallucinations and bias, and without consuming our municipal water supply, I would've agreed that it creates that kind of worth/alternative similar to the examples on nuclear use you said. But I can't think of an example of such an alternative.

    We're just not talking about who owns it and hence who benefits - which is, the corporations. I know China has good models but even those cost too much for me as I live in a third world country and programming was supposed to be a way for me to earn an income.


  • No Más@lemmygrad.ml
    Aquileo | hexagon
    toCrush Agentic AI@lemmygrad.ml"Useful" is not sufficient
    ·
    Aquileo | edit-2
    19 days ago

    The comparison between AI and child labour was a hypothetical because, AI may be causing similar levels of damage - it generates through non consensually obtained datasets of human endeavour and hence is as unethical as CL. It's a bit like saying if we keep going down this road, we will become very proficient at writing prompts to take the easy way out while losing the experience of understanding the context. And the argument is, that within the logic of capitalism, it will all be because it was possible. Whether you say its merely a tool or not.

    And if I'm building a weekend project (as opposed to a business product), I can speak for myself in that it was always equally an opportunity to learn about the underlying technology so that I can keep it running, have more ideas, and finally, be an expert in it someday. These days I vibecode projects just for the sake of it. And speaking from personal experience, I don't learn much at all. I've heard lots of others face this kind of cognitive decline.

    Edit: I'm not sure if that's what you're saying, but if we are okay with LLM's becoming our experts in the long run, they should not be so probabilistic. As in, we can never really monitor at a low level what a given population will get in return if they prompt for x task. Much less, we don't even know how to monitor an LLM's generation process except by asking it to generate something that assures us it's vectors mapped out what an individual user can only hope is what it semiotically connotes.













  • While on Reddit, I vaguely remember there being discourse on how upvotes should be for adding to the discourse only. Also that there was some archaic form of AI baked into the algorithm so that users who upvoted en masse would not have their votes counted.

    While I wouldn't want AI in any form for moderation, I think this discussion is necessary and perhaps we ought to have more information on how it is meant to encourage discussion through upvotes, whether or not we use downvotes.