Skip to content

Make it so that all RECs can gain new features & simplify terminology accordingly - #1168

Merged
frivoal merged 5 commits into
w3c:mainfrom
frivoal:all-recs-can-gain-new-features
Jul 22, 2026
Merged

Make it so that all RECs can gain new features & simplify terminology accordingly#1168
frivoal merged 5 commits into
w3c:mainfrom
frivoal:all-recs-can-gain-new-features

Conversation

@frivoal

@frivoal frivoal commented Jun 11, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

This pull request implements the AB resolution documented in https://github.com/w3c/AB-memberonly/issues/244#issuecomment-4303099327, doing away with the distinction between Recommendations that allow new features and those that do not. This enables a simplification of Process rules and terminology.

This is notable in that it breaks a long standing guarantee previously offered by the Process. Until now, unless they contained an explicit statement to the contrary (know as "allowing new features"), documents could not gain new features after their initial publication as Recommendations, even as editorial improvements or bug fixes were being added through updates. References could be made to them using their undated URL while being confident that the scope/featureset would not change.

However, it was found that the terminology and process mechanics needed to maintain this distinction was the source of much confusion, while there is scant evidence that anybody actually depended on this guarantee. (People who want to depend on a Recommendation not changing at all after publication can continue to do so, as they always have, but using the dated URL for that publication).

This PR is organized in 3 commits, applying progressively stronger simplifications in terminology.
Together (and not counting the 31 lines added the "Retired terminology" appendix), they results in a net reduction of 43 lines (+33 -76), and retirement of 8 dfned terms.


Preview | Diff

frivoal added 3 commits June 11, 2026 17:46
Remove the opt-in distinction between Recommendations that "allow new
features" and those that don't, so that we may have a single type of
Recommendations.

The distinction and the related procedural steps were a frequent source of
confusion.

Part of addressing w3c/AB-memberonly#244
This these are now proceduraly interchangeable and valid in the same
situations, formal distinction is no longer necessary. Informal
descriptions of the nature of the changes remain possible,
but are no longer mandated by the Process.

Part of addressing w3c/AB-memberonly#244
@frivoal frivoal self-assigned this Jun 11, 2026
Comment thread index.bs Outdated
Comment thread index.bs Outdated
frivoal and others added 2 commits June 12, 2026 10:45
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
Co-authored-by: Ted Thibodeau Jr <tthibodeau@openlinksw.com>
@frivoal frivoal added the Agenda+ Recommends to the Chairs that this issue or pull request be discussed at the next meeting label Jun 24, 2026
@frivoal frivoal added Closed: Accepted The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion and removed Needs Review Agenda+ Recommends to the Chairs that this issue or pull request be discussed at the next meeting labels Jul 22, 2026
@frivoal frivoal added this to the Process Next milestone Jul 22, 2026
@frivoal
frivoal merged commit d4d40d7 into w3c:main Jul 22, 2026
2 checks passed
@frivoal
frivoal deleted the all-recs-can-gain-new-features branch July 22, 2026 14:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Closed: Accepted The issue has been addressed, though not necessarily based on the initial suggestion

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants