Skip to content

defaultTracingObservationHandler is not ordered as documented - #34216

Closed
ttddyy wants to merge 1 commit into
spring-projects:mainfrom
ttddyy:tracing-handler-order
Closed

defaultTracingObservationHandler is not ordered as documented#34216
ttddyy wants to merge 1 commit into
spring-projects:mainfrom
ttddyy:tracing-handler-order

Conversation

@ttddyy

@ttddyy ttddyy commented Feb 16, 2023

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

The javadoc on MicrometerTracingAutoConfiguration.DEFAULT_TRACING_OBSERVATION_HANDLER_ORDER says it is a @Order value for the defaultTracingObservationHandler bean.
However, in the code, this constant is not applied to the defaultTracingObservationHandler bean definition.

This PR specifies the missing @Order on the defaultTracingObservationHandler bean.

Signed-off-by: Tadaya Tsuyukubo <tadaya@ttddyy.net>
@spring-projects-issues spring-projects-issues added the status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged label Feb 16, 2023
@mhalbritter mhalbritter added type: enhancement A general enhancement theme: observability Issues related to observability type: bug A general bug and removed status: waiting-for-triage An issue we've not yet triaged type: enhancement A general enhancement labels Feb 17, 2023
@mhalbritter mhalbritter modified the milestones: 3.1.x, 3.0.x Feb 17, 2023
@wilkinsona wilkinsona changed the title Specify @Order to the defaultTracingObservationHandler bean definition defaultTracingObservationHandler is not ordered as documented Feb 20, 2023
@wilkinsona wilkinsona modified the milestones: 3.0.x, 3.0.4 Feb 24, 2023
wilkinsona pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 24, 2023
See gh-34216

Signed-off-by: Tadaya Tsuyukubo <tadaya@ttddyy.net>
@wilkinsona

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Thanks very much, @ttddyy.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

theme: observability Issues related to observability type: bug A general bug

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants