• 29 Posts
  • 4.93K Comments
Joined 3 years ago
Aquileo | cake
Cake day: July 16th, 2023

Aquileo | help-circle

  • Tja. Mein Mann hat gerade seine zweite Ausbildung gemacht.

    Seine Erste war als HFW und er hat jahrelang auf eine Stelle gewartet, für die man nicht gleich eine Franchise kaufen muss, also sich gleich verschulden muss. Nachdem er mehrere Jahre immer noch nur hinter der Fleischtheke stehen musste, wollte er seine Beschäftigungschancen erhöhen. Das heißt, er hat Mitte dreißiger Jahren eine (zum Glück gekürzte) Ausbildung als Metzger gemacht.

    Bis vor kurzem hat er rund um €850 für 128 Stunden Arbeit (plus regelmäßige Darstellungen von selten bearbeiteten Fleischstücken an seinem freien Tag/Schultag- er sollte um 4 auftauchen und nur bis sieben bleiben, also “fast das gleiche wie ein freier Tag”) und 32 Stunden Schule pro Monat verdient. Ich bin Studentin und darf nur 80 Stunden/Monat arbeiten, also war es wirklich stressig, teilweise normal zu leben.

    Ich komme aus den USA und hab mich wirklich gewundert, dass man in Deutschland so viel unter dem Mindestlohn verdienen darf.





  • That’s because in the old world, social cohesion was the most important factor in your group’s survival. Anything that got in the way of that, like neurodivergence, being otherwise different, or not having children with other members of your group when it was expected, could endanger your survival*.

    Thankfully, we’re not in that world anymore, and the differences between our world and the one in which those rules/laws arose are what make morality developed during that time irrelevant. We can explain why murder is still wrong today without relying on religious texts for justification, but we can’t explain why eating lobster is more wrong than eating beef anymore, nor can we explain why just being different is wrong anymore.

    The people who made those laws lived in a rapidly desertifying climate before refrigeration or indoor plumbing - if your group wanted to eat lobster, they would have a lower chance of survival overall. You can find reasons like this for most religions’ rules, and some of them, like banning murder, still contribute to our group survival, but that’s not a reason to assume any given religious prohibition is sensible today.

    *to be clear, I’m not suggesting that any of those things were actually wrong or inherently contrary to a group’s survival, because many cultures had no issue with weirdos, neurodivergence, or queerness. The people making these rules probably believed they were good for their group, but they didn’t have access to the information that we do now, nor did they have the benefit of the intervening millennia of philosophical developments. The groups that prohibited queerness and observed dietary restrictions were also trying to separate themselves from the groups around them, to strengthen in group feeling, and they enforced it later when converting new groups as a way to mark a clear cultural shift from the old ways.





  • idiomaddict@lemmy.worldtoFediverse@lemmy.worldSome thoughts after 3 years on Lemmy
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    1
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 hours ago

    It’s hard for me to know whether I am dealing with people who are genuinely misunderstanding my arguments, or if they are simply trying to cast doubt on my conclusions by pretending to misunderstand how I arrived at them.

    That’s hard for me too, but if you start out by assuming both, you’re going to offend people.

    I’m trying to do you a favor by telling you. I’m no longer trying to discuss the original thing at all, because I don’t feel like you’re going to engage well with the conversation. I get the sense that you’ll continue to try and cover all your bases with one comment, starting off seemingly genuine and then ending with passive aggression.

    I will make better use of my time going forward, so I won’t be engaging further, but I hope you realize that I have been genuine with you.




  • idiomaddict@lemmy.worldtoFediverse@lemmy.worldSome thoughts after 3 years on Lemmy
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    2
    Aquileo | arrow-down
    3
    ·
    14 hours ago

    You seem to be confused about how my two arms point relates to the rest of my comment. It is somewhat confusing tbf, especially if you have a reason to misinterpret it in a specific way.

    It has nothing to do with making sweeping claims about all 1.5 billion Muslims on this planet, it has to do with probability and risk, and I think deep down you probably already knew that.

    Well, hey! That seems ideologically consistent and all, but the swing in angle hits me as creepy, so sorry.


  • I’m surprised trump hasn’t tried starting something similar but I guess he’s going the uneducated population route which also seems to be working

    We were already there before trump, so he didn’t need to. I’ve been in places where the American public spontaneously applauds a veteran. Think about all the people who like to “thank veterans for their service” or the idea that military experience prepares you for holding office. We do also fuck our veterans over constantly, but that’s because they’re no longer useful to the war machine and they’re considered inconvenient if they need help, but that’s just the American way.






  • Power corrupts. They are a world power and know that they can get away with some things that all governments want to do, but many fear their own people or external governments too much to try.

    At the same time, most of the people in the government haven’t lost their humanity entirely and want to do things that help in the ways that they can. That’s also true of most of the people in most governments everywhere, but China’s propaganda is less anti-science and more community focused than that of a lot of other countries, so the problems that individuals in government want to solve and the solutions they come up with are better for the world at large than those in governments with anti-scientific, individualistic propaganda.

    World superpowers can only exist through force or exploitation, so they’re inherently evil, but not everything that comes from them is automatically evil (to be clear, I’m not saying we shouldn’t walk away from Omelas, just that you can recognize how awesome China’s rail system or its incredible climb out of widespread poverty is without supporting the genocide of Uyghurs).