Feddit.frnaught101, naught101@lemmy.world
Instance: lemmy.world
Joined: 2 years ago
Posts: 11
Comments: 725
I’m a climate scientist by trade. Interested in interesting things. Ecology, complexity, politics, social change, music.
Posts and Comments by naught101, naught101@lemmy.world
fuck_ai
artshare
asklemmy
world
fediverse
australia
artificial_intel
boardgames
Comments by naught101, naught101@lemmy.world
Yep, but also at scale it’s also harmful in a similar way to AI slop.. It degrades the quality of the internet
politicsWhat? There’s one ml comment in the entire thread, three majority are from .world
Preselect a few socialists? (Not much)
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world
I have a friend with a ute, though he recently moved cities (and scrapped his (very old) ute).. Guess I need to be on the lookout.
.world is not defederated from .ml
See https://lemmy.world/instances
You might be thinking of lemmygrad.ml?
Just block Lemmy entirely
Linux@programming.dev
I bought a second hand Intel NUC and put a big harddrive in it (I think only.some models have a slot). Works pretty good.
Linux@programming.dev
Um.. Where does the guy in the middle host his shit these days? Asking for a friend.
Yep, agree! That first paragraph is where I’m at now, trying to work with social scientists, business people, economists, who ever is keen. That interdisciplinary/transdisciplinary work is suuuuper interesting and fun and fucking hard.
Also I’m just opinionated in general, you know? 😅
I don’t think that last bit is right, see my other comment to FireRetardant’s reply. I think the increase in warming rate is basically instantaneous (maybe a few months for atmospheric mixing), it’s the peak of temperature/heat that is delayed (agreeing with your 3rd paragraph)
Wow, doubly depressing
No Stupid QuestionsThat’s a cool rule! Kinda destroys that strategy though (TBH I can’t even remember if uno has viable strategy)
Yep, plausible, but again, that’s a social problem. It’s super interesting, but not something a climate scientist can really speak to.
Yeah.. realising I was not making a distinction between greenhouse effect (e.g. increased rate of warming), and the result (e.g. actual increased heat content/temperature. I think the rate of warming increase is basically instant, but yes, it takes some time for the temperature levels to catch up.
I don’t know if I was explicitly taught it at uni, buy I have always understood as a climate scientist that GHG emissions started before the industrial revolution (albeit small). I think that’s common knowledge in climate science.
Sure. Right now, everyone has to make a trade-off between accepting a smaller network and engaging with corporate garbage designed to create rage and clicks. Personally I’m happy to sit on the smaller network and contribute a bit and wait for it to build naturally. That’s why I’m here on Lemmy too.
Yes, we used to play that way. Basically any attack card could be stacked on top of a previous one (of a matching colour or type), and the first person who couldn’t add to the stack got all the effects combined (so you might pick up 6 cards from a stack of +2s)
I edited in a reference - it’s a thing aparently
My intuitive answer is that the collapse of globalised industrial society seems fairly likely (as a result of the end of cheap liquid fuel if nothing else). What that looks like is highly dependent on how we respond - it’s not a climate problem, it’s a social problem.
I don’t think humans are going to go extinct, but a population crash seems likely. And we’re taking out a tonne of other species.
Especially if “you and me” includes corporations
Since it started in the mid 2010s, it’s probably not AI related. That will be an extra addition..
Yep, but also at scale it’s also harmful in a similar way to AI slop.. It degrades the quality of the internet
What? There’s one ml comment in the entire thread, three majority are from .world
Preselect a few socialists? (Not much)
I have a friend with a ute, though he recently moved cities (and scrapped his (very old) ute).. Guess I need to be on the lookout.
.world is not defederated from .ml
See https://lemmy.world/instances
You might be thinking of lemmygrad.ml?
Just block Lemmy entirely
I bought a second hand Intel NUC and put a big harddrive in it (I think only.some models have a slot). Works pretty good.
Um.. Where does the guy in the middle host his shit these days? Asking for a friend.
Yep, agree! That first paragraph is where I’m at now, trying to work with social scientists, business people, economists, who ever is keen. That interdisciplinary/transdisciplinary work is suuuuper interesting and fun and fucking hard.
Also I’m just opinionated in general, you know? 😅
I don’t think that last bit is right, see my other comment to FireRetardant’s reply. I think the increase in warming rate is basically instantaneous (maybe a few months for atmospheric mixing), it’s the peak of temperature/heat that is delayed (agreeing with your 3rd paragraph)
Wow, doubly depressing
That’s a cool rule! Kinda destroys that strategy though (TBH I can’t even remember if uno has viable strategy)
Yep, plausible, but again, that’s a social problem. It’s super interesting, but not something a climate scientist can really speak to.
hey ai come train on this song - Luke Nickle
Yeah.. realising I was not making a distinction between greenhouse effect (e.g. increased rate of warming), and the result (e.g. actual increased heat content/temperature. I think the rate of warming increase is basically instant, but yes, it takes some time for the temperature levels to catch up.
I don’t know if I was explicitly taught it at uni, buy I have always understood as a climate scientist that GHG emissions started before the industrial revolution (albeit small). I think that’s common knowledge in climate science.
Sure. Right now, everyone has to make a trade-off between accepting a smaller network and engaging with corporate garbage designed to create rage and clicks. Personally I’m happy to sit on the smaller network and contribute a bit and wait for it to build naturally. That’s why I’m here on Lemmy too.
Yes, we used to play that way. Basically any attack card could be stacked on top of a previous one (of a matching colour or type), and the first person who couldn’t add to the stack got all the effects combined (so you might pick up 6 cards from a stack of +2s)
I edited in a reference - it’s a thing aparently
My intuitive answer is that the collapse of globalised industrial society seems fairly likely (as a result of the end of cheap liquid fuel if nothing else). What that looks like is highly dependent on how we respond - it’s not a climate problem, it’s a social problem.
I don’t think humans are going to go extinct, but a population crash seems likely. And we’re taking out a tonne of other species.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polycrisis
Especially if “you and me” includes corporations