I’ve been revisiting anno 2205, infamously the ugly duckling of the Anno series of RTS games. I don’t mind so much the fact that it’s different, lacks customisation and random map generation - I’m bothered because the game is so slow to progress through on challenge settings, and it feels like a game designed just to artificially waste your time; in other anno games, you can always pull tricks to dig yourself out of economic crisis - selling off assets and surplus goods, completing quests for other parties, or taking loans. 2205 is very very confined in terms of what you can do to financially recover in the early game and forces you into a lot of military events.

    • Tiefkuehlkost@feddit.org
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      14
      ·
      7 days ago

      MC has at least the building part for me thats cool for some time. And the Modding and Server with friends part.

      NMS has this boring flat tile building system and also just forgets terrain modification after some time or plants respawn into your buildings so you can even build on the ground…

      Multiplayer is wonky and annoing and as far as i know it does not have much modding…

      All planets feel the same after a few hours. The existance of medium Asteroids and Gas Giants is completely missing. And you cant build spacestations withoud weird stack up from plannet hacking.

      I want to love the game cause like the idea and the ongoing support from the devs but when ever i try it again its just sad.

      • stephen01king@piefed.zip
        Aquileo | link
        Aquileo | fedilink
        English
        Aquileo | arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Like he said, it’s like vanilla minecraft, so you have to make your own goals and your own fun. I spent hours just walking around collecting resources to build the things I decided I want that time. Hours more building my Corvette, Freighter and bases. If that’s not fun to you, that’s ok.

    • shani66@ani.social
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 days ago

      It’s way worse about that than Minecraft, imo. I find Minecraft to be exceptionally boring, but building is at least passably fun (or was before hytale completely blew it out of the water), but it feels like NMS doesn’t even give you a real creative outlet. From what I’ve seen even starfield is better than NMS for creativity, although i haven’t played starfield myself.

      • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
        Aquileo | link
        Aquileo | fedilink
        English
        Aquileo | arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        Starfield? I would argue it’s much worse than NMS, though I don’t know how the current game is. Back when I played, a couple of months before the first dlc dropped (before the buggy update, even), you were extremely limited in choices for base building. You had like 4 or 5 prefabs of a living quarter which came pre decorated.

        Starfield offers good ship customization (and stupidly talent-locks a lot of it), unlike NMS, which only added a tiny bit of that in an update last year I think

    • Noggog@programming.dev
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      4
      Aquileo | arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Terraria is the Minecraft that’s meant to be played. Actually has dungeon crawling and a world to experience. Minecraft is just 3D Microsoft Paint that decides to chase your cursor with a zombie every so often.