• 0 Posts
  • 219 Comments
Joined 6 months ago
Aquileo | cake
Cake day: January 27th, 2026

Aquileo | help-circle




  • Because they can. They don’t even have to justify it. My car insurance goes up every year despite no accidents on my record. I look at competitors rates and they are even more expensive. Across the board they are just raising rates.

    And we as consumers have no recourse, because we are required to have car insurance to drive, so it’s not like we can just boycott them. Would not be surprised to learn that there is collusion going on between all the auto insurance companies to keep their rates roughly similar and raise them all at once.


  • Furbag@pawb.socialtoGames@sh.itjust.worksWhat's the rarest Steam achievement you got?
    Aquileo | link
    Aquileo | fedilink
    English
    Aquileo | arrow-up
    3
    ·
    Aquileo | edit-2
    4 days ago

    All my latest most rare achievements are all from Megabonk, which IMO don’t really count. They are easy to get if you just play long enough.

    My rarest for a very long time was this one with something like 0.3%, but it has apparently since gone way up. It used to have one of those gold borders around it indicating it was very rare. I got this on my second round that I played and then quit pretty much right after that. Not a very good game, unfortunately.

    The one I am most proud of is this one:

    I got bored after I took over Britannia as the Britons and had no more enemies who could realistically challenge me, so I sailed directly down to Rome with my army of slingers and tribesmen and sacked Rome for something like 100k denarii.

    EDIT: Well, nevermind, this is my newest rare achievement (for now)






  • You’ve missed the point.

    Someone who Googled their symptoms and ended up at WebMD were presented with reliable albeit ambiguous information. Carefully curated by medical professionals and not random snake oil salesmen or homeopathy gurus. They fail to interpret the symptoms correctly, because of course they would. If they are looking up causes of a headache, it can be anything from brain tumor to low blood sugar, or even no reason at all.

    Someone who asks AI for medical advice is going to get the entire internet worth of fucking opinions, as well as medical journals and such, because that’s where ChatGPT, Gemini, Grok and Claude all got their data from. And it will string those words together in a way that sounds authoritative, but it will have literally zero concept of what it’s talking about. It’s an overgrown autocomplete. You ask for it to provide some citations, but no amount of asking for citations will compel people to actually read them, nor will there be any guarantee that the LLMs couldn’t just hallucinate that as well.

    It’s like taking a Google search for medical information and adding a middleman who occasionally filters in junk data, then wrapping it in a nice package, giving the impression of authority and accuracy, making the process as frictionless as possible.

    There can be no reasonable expectation that people who have not historically been capable of making good choices in regards to seeking online medical advice will suddenly start doing it all of their own volition.

    You might say “What’s the harm if they end up at the hospital either way”? But the danger is that they never go to the hospital at all because the chatbot told them to sun their perineum or inject bleach with the confident prose of a medical doctor and they just… do it. Because why would the AI be wrong?

    And who is to blame when someone is injured or killed as a result? Doctors have standards, and they take an oath to first do no harm. If they make a mistake, they are liable for it. How can you hold a machine intelligence accountable for inaccurate diagnoses?

    The simple answer is you can’t, and so logically they should be strictly prohibited from masquerading as any kind of authority on medicine.






  • Expecting people who have already taken the easy route of asking an AI to summarize medical information to do additional due diligence by reading the sources that the AI spits out is naive as fuck.

    There’s a reason it became a meme for someone to Google their symptoms, click on WebMD to read about it, and then come to the conclusion that they have cancer, all without ever having seen a medical professional in the meanwhile. Do you really think these sorts of people are going to be using AI responsibly for research purposes only?




  • We do print money and we have steady inflation, but inflation is still inflation.

    A lot of people seem to be clinging onto the wrong concept here. Nobody is arguing against the reality that the government can print money to pay it’s own debts or solve an economic crisis, because they obviously do it all the time and sometimes the damage done from the inflationary reaction caused by printing more money is significantly preferable to what the alternative could have been (severe recession, economic collapse, etc.).

    The point I am trying to make is that Elon is making a specific claim that printing money has a deflationary effect, which I have personally never seen evidence of, no economist has ever seriously theorized, and flies in the face of common sense and human nature.