Last I heard he was in the US, so probably not even that

It was revoked after he started chaingrabbing patients

This is called unemployment.

They were being forced to lay eggs?

…are to be pursued for legal responsibility in accordance with law.

Missed the last sentence. Seems like you don’t know the history of the Uighur region as well.

Not a nothing burger if it directly refutes one of the main claims that Ethnic unity is not defined. So you’ve read the unity law now directly I hope, seeing that this whole fear mongering article is a nothing burger. Very big of you to attack me, shows your ideas can stand up on their own.

Do you think it has to do with the extreme instability in their lives or something else

Article 63: Organizations and individuals outside the [mainland] territory of the P.R.C. that commit acts aimed at the P.R.C. that undermine ethnic unity and progress or create ethnic division are to be pursued for legal responsibility in accordance with law.

Here is what the text actually says. Ethnic unity is well defined within the earlier articles. Yeah, this does mean that if, say, the USA is taking action to encourage the people of China to resist China (let’s say they funded a splinter group of ISIS in the Uighur region), they can retaliate against the US.

Disagree? Read them here yourself instead of depending on some random scare mongering

Go full sovcit

Where is this from?

After rereviewing the interview and statement, I agree that even if this was an honest mistake, her retraction was not enough. She did not speak her implied two-state solution, which is unacceptable.

OP can you add her statement saying she misspoke?

I fumbled this line, plane and simple. To be clear, my foreign policy priority is ending Israel’s occupation, apartheid, and genocide in Palestine. I also reject the notion that anti-Zionism is antisemitism, and it’s important that we distinguish the two in order to combat actual antisemitism. I have always been opposed to any form of ethno-supremacy, and I refuse to vote for any of our tax dollars to go to any government that discriminates on that basis. I was being asked about rising antisemitism in this interview, and I was trying to say that my concern is while voters across the political spectrum wake up to Israel’s atrocities and our government’s complicity in it, the Democratic Party is failing to meet this moment. And when the Party refuses to lead morally on this issue, they are letting antisemites on the right co-opt the movement for Palestinian liberation while giving fodder to AIPAC talking points. But Sana is right, a movement for liberation must center the Palestinians being oppressed, occupied, and systematically exterminated — and the islamophobia and anti-Palestinian racism used to justify genocide is too often ignored. source

Has he read any of the laws surrounding campaigns? They definitely do.

Mailman = fighterfighter

To be clear, this is not DSAs line, these are Democrat acting opportunistically within the electoralist faction of DSA.

Edit: She has made a statement saying she mispoke

I fumbled this line, plane and simple. To be clear, my foreign policy priority is ending Israel’s occupation, apartheid, and genocide in Palestine. I also reject the notion that anti-Zionism is antisemitism, and it’s important that we distinguish the two in order to combat actual antisemitism. I have always been opposed to any form of ethno-supremacy, and I refuse to vote for any of our tax dollars to go to any government that discriminates on that basis. I was being asked about rising antisemitism in this interview, and I was trying to say that my concern is while voters across the political spectrum wake up to Israel’s atrocities and our government’s complicity in it, the Democratic Party is failing to meet this moment. And when the Party refuses to lead morally on this issue, they are letting antisemites on the right co-opt the movement for Palestinian liberation while giving fodder to AIPAC talking points. But Sana is right, a movement for liberation must center the Palestinians being oppressed, occupied, and systematically exterminated — and the islamophobia and anti-Palestinian racism used to justify genocide is too often ignored. source

Despite being in DSA, she is explicitly speaking against DSAs ratified anti-Zionist line and in no way represents the org.

Edit: She has made a statement saying she mispoke

I fumbled this line, plane and simple. To be clear, my foreign policy priority is ending Israel’s occupation, apartheid, and genocide in Palestine. I also reject the notion that anti-Zionism is antisemitism, and it’s important that we distinguish the two in order to combat actual antisemitism. I have always been opposed to any form of ethno-supremacy, and I refuse to vote for any of our tax dollars to go to any government that discriminates on that basis. I was being asked about rising antisemitism in this interview, and I was trying to say that my concern is while voters across the political spectrum wake up to Israel’s atrocities and our government’s complicity in it, the Democratic Party is failing to meet this moment. And when the Party refuses to lead morally on this issue, they are letting antisemites on the right co-opt the movement for Palestinian liberation while giving fodder to AIPAC talking points. But Sana is right, a movement for liberation must center the Palestinians being oppressed, occupied, and systematically exterminated — and the islamophobia and anti-Palestinian racism used to justify genocide is too often ignored. source

That being said, she did not speak against her implied two-state solution and it’s still unacceptable.

Same policies, different jerk.

The blue trolley does not move slower, I’d say it accelerates more slowly than when it’s blue than red. The train never slows down.

Is this dialectics?