I mean, not that it has reached its full potential, just that it won’t be developed anymore because of AI translation tools… I’m trying to use a local AI to translate subtitles and it’s just using 97% of RAM and 50% of CPU and doing shit lol

    • jol@discuss.tchncs.de
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 days ago

      The current wave of LLM development did put a stop to a lot of AI research. LLM is this big hammer that you can hit everything with, and kinda solve it. But it’s rarely the most efficient and correct. But because it’s so much easy to use, that’s what people are using now.

    • PiraHxCx@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
      Aquileo | link
      Aquileo | fedilink
      English
      Aquileo | arrow-up
      2
      Aquileo | arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 days ago

      LLM translation is waaaay more advanced than machine translation.
      My fear is that they will stop machine translation because it has been so outclassed.
      My special case is that running it locally is very resource consuming (unlike machine translation).

      • Steve@communick.news
        Aquileo | link
        Aquileo | fedilink
        English
        Aquileo | arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        Oh! I didn’t realize you were talking about two different things. LLMs are still machines. Now I get it.

        Yah I would expect since LLMs do a much better job, the older methods are going to slowly disappear.